Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Eiliv-Sonas Aceron

‘I'll have the DNA-optimised salad please': What's the future of clean eating?

From genetic scans to personalised nutrition.

The way we live is changing fast. Every fortnight in our Future Focus series, supported by Volkswagen, we’ll look at how one aspect of everyday life could change in the coming years. This week: ‘clean eats’.

AN APPLE A day keeps the doctor away, or so the old saying goes. But with more food options and more information than ever, the idea of eating healthily has changed greatly in the last few decades.

According to a recent Bord Bia survey, 88 per cent of Irish people recognise the importance of eating well, and nearly two-thirds want help when it comes to having healthier meals and snacks.

But in a busy and changing world, how do we eat well and how is that going to evolve in the future?

Dr Rena Barry-Ryan, lecturer in food product development at TU Dublin, says she is seeing plenty of trends but one of the big ones is flexitarianism. This involves people cutting back on the amount of meat they eat during the week, whether that’s for their health, the environment or food sustainability. Even Leo Varadkar is on board.

This dietary shift is then leading to an increase in new plant-based products, with companies such as Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods developing meat-free alternatives that taste, smell and ‘bleed’ like beef burgers.

Fake meat aside, Barry-Ryan adds that there are plenty of other healthy options that could become more common on our dinner tables in the coming years. This includes fermented drinks such as kombucha, hemp products, exotic fruits and berries that haven’t come to Europe yet, seaweed, and even insects.

Then on the more extreme side of things there are products like Soylent, the meal-replacement drink made popular by time-strapped techies in Silicon Valley, that claims to provide enough plant-based protein, vitamins and minerals for a full lunch.

SIPA USA / PA Images SIPA USA / PA Images / PA Images

But Barry-Ryan isn’t convinced that this type of high-tech food is going to be for everyone in the future.

“We know how to make a food product that has the appropriate nutrition. You could get it in a vial or a supplement, but long-term how many people would want that? There’s a side to food that we enjoy, especially in social environments.”

So if we’re not all going to take to the idea of drinking a shake or popping a pill to get all our nutrients, what’s the way forward for healthy eating?

“The next big thing with technology is going to be personalised nutrition,” Barry-Ryan adds.

‘One size fits all’

What if your DNA could tell you exactly what you should be eating? That’s one of the ideas behind personalised nutrition, which aims to use genetic, physical and social factors to develop individual nutritional guidelines for each person.

Eileen Gibney, associate professor at UCD’s Institute of Food and Health, is currently conducting research in this area, looking at ways it could change how we eat well in the future.

“Traditionally we’ve given nutritional advice in terms of the healthy eating pyramid – a ‘one size fits all’ approach for the whole population. But the future of healthy eating is in the area of personalised nutrition,” Gibney says.

To figure out guidelines and recommendations that are tailored to a specific person, researchers are analysing things like diet, blood pressure, cholesterol and even DNA.

Although there is still a lot of research going on in this area, Gibney says that it is now becoming easier to get the required data for analysis. Smartphones are providing user-friendly ways to measure certain vital signs, with apps that can scan food labels and keep track of what you’re putting into your body every day.

“There’s now the ability with technology to capture what people are eating, to measure their own heart rate and blood pressure, their weight and height. When you harness all of that technology and data, we’ll be able to give personalised advice.

“We can say, ‘You need to increase your fibre, or your folate, or eat more oily fish’. That’s the kind of personalisation that I think will become natural.”

Shutterstock / Dani Vincek Shutterstock / Dani Vincek / Dani Vincek

As well as creating a balanced diet that’s tailored to you, researchers will be able to recommend foods to embrace or avoid based on your genetic risk of developing certain diseases.

With home DNA tests becoming more popular and less expensive, some startup companies are already offering custom eating plans based on genetics, such as DNA Fit in the UK and Habit in the US. But Gibney says that more factors need to be taken into account to give the full picture and make accurate nutrition plans.

“The science isn’t there yet. I can look at someone’s weight, height, genotypic risks and give advice based on that. But I also have to know what they are eating now, their likes and dislikes, how much money do they have to spend on food, can they cook, do they eat with their family or eat alone?

“Food is really complex and I think we have to remember that. The genotype stuff is scientifically very good, but it isn’t the only thing that will influence the correct advice for an individual.”

However, making a personalised nutrition plan could be something that everyone does from the comfort of their own home in the future. As technology advances on our phones and in our kitchens, we could even have connected systems that would make eating healthy a whole lot easier.

“I think in 20 years from now, I’ll be able to capture my DNA and my cholesterol levels at home. I’ll know what I’m eating by taking pictures on my phone every day and it’ll analyse the data,” Gibney says.

“Then it’ll give me advice. It will scan what’s in my fridge and could build a shopping list that will go to my online retailer. Food will be delivered along with recipes and my robot kitchen will be able to make dinner by the time I get home from work.”

Although the technology isn’t quite there yet and more developments are needed before personalised nutrition becomes a mainstream concept, Gibney says that the pieces are starting to come together.

So in a few years’ time your robot chef may be preparing seaweed bites, but you may also still be eating an apple a day if that is what’s recommended for you.

“We’ll still be eating fruits and vegetables, cereals and breads. We have been eating those for thousands of years so I don’t think that will change,” Gibney adds.

“But we will see changes that will make foods more sustainable, more suitable for changing populations, and we’ll be able to recognise what people need at an individual personalised level, helping them choose the foods that are right for their body.”

More: Bye-bye bifocals, hello bionic eyes: the future of seeing and hearing>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
18 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Suzie Sunshine
    Favourite Suzie Sunshine
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 8:00 AM

    also , I don’t think it should be called ” bettering ” their exams results , it’s questioning their results to make sure they were graded properly .

    177
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sloop John G
    Favourite Sloop John G
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 10:26 AM

    Suzie, of course people are appealing to better their result. If they thought that the examiner had been generous to them do you really think they’d appeal in order for the exam to be “graded properly”?

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Suzie Sunshine
    Favourite Suzie Sunshine
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 10:53 AM

    sloop ,yes to better their result because the students believe they did better than the results they were given so therefore appeal , but if it had been graded properly in the first place then they wouldn’t have to appeal .

    22
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Powerful Sayings
    Favourite Powerful Sayings
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 11:20 AM

    But its not called bettering?

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sloop John G
    Favourite Sloop John G
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 12:14 PM

    Agreed Suzie, but, not wishing to sound pedantic, the article is about the results of the appeals not why the students had to appeal. Having said that, the fact that there were so many appeals raises serious questions which need to be answered

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Barry Vickers
    Favourite Barry Vickers
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 7:56 AM

    so nearly a fifth of results appealed were wrong? that’s quite startling

    123
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute HRH The Brummie
    Favourite HRH The Brummie
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 9:53 AM

    Over 25% of Biology was upgraded. What a poor marking performance. And let’s not forget those marking Biology were the ones teaching it too…. scary.

    51
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute S ReiIIy
    Favourite S ReiIIy
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 10:18 AM

    25% of appealed results were upgraded, appealed results are not an accurate sample of exam papers, it is in fact a very small percentage of total papers.

    50
    See 3 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Moylan
    Favourite John Moylan
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 10:39 AM

    25% of Biology was upgraded ? – where are you getting that figure from ? 245 out of 25,596 is not 25%……..

    Now if you said 25% of those appealed, that would be different………..

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute HRH The Brummie
    Favourite HRH The Brummie
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 10:57 AM

    well they don’t generally upgrade non appealed papers now do they. Think about it for a while…. 25% of all appealed Biology papers were upgraded. They are a representation of both the standard of marking a teaching.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Barry Vickers
    Favourite Barry Vickers
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 5:24 PM

    I understand that S ReiIIy, but I think some thought should be put into reviewing a broader sample of appealed and unappealed papers to investigate what the actual % is, given that the percentage of appealed is so high.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute mickmc
    Favourite mickmc
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 8:01 AM

    How can so many results be wrong? Will the teacher that gave these wrong results be marking next year?

    91
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute IrishGravyTrain
    Favourite IrishGravyTrain
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 8:17 AM

    Course they will. You can’t punish anyone in this country

    52
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute HRH The Brummie
    Favourite HRH The Brummie
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 9:50 AM

    Except non public or state and semi state workers. we’re fair game.

    8
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eamon DeValera
    Favourite Eamon DeValera
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 11:48 AM

    2000 wrong out of almost 390,000 is a pretty good result. Don’t forget that for many exams what is right and what is wrong can be a matter of opinion.

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pat Mustard
    Favourite Pat Mustard
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 8:18 AM

    1,822 upgraded yet only 3 downgraded, I somehow find it hard to believe that so many were marked mistakenly in one direction only.

    51
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute S ReiIIy
    Favourite S ReiIIy
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 9:01 AM

    There’s always going to be more upgrades as you would generally only appeal a result if you think you should have been marked higher after viewing the script yourself, and often with a teacher. If you thought you were lucky to get what you got surely you’d leave well enough alone and not appeal it?

    53
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sloop John G
    Favourite Sloop John G
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 10:21 AM

    I never knew there was an exam on One Direction Pat? If there was I’m sure a lot of teenagers scored well on it !!!

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Hanlon
    Favourite David Hanlon
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 9:05 AM

    Lot of good it does for students who may have missed out on a college place due to erroneously marked papers when the term started 6 weeks ago for most colleges. Shocking number of papers marked incorrectly too it seems.

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eamon DeValera
    Favourite Eamon DeValera
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 11:45 AM

    Is 1 in 200 really “shocking”? Bear in mind that many papers have a lot of wiggle room for answers to be “right” or “wrong”. Take Economics for example, one I got checked. For one question on the advantages of Foreign Direct Investment one could say:

    Increases Employment
    Increases State Revenue through Taxtion
    Decreases Social Welfare Spend
    Increases Consumer Spending
    Decreases State Healthcare costs.

    You could get anywhere between 5 and 30 on that answer, depending on the corrector and marking scheme. Some will come along and consider them all separate valid points, another could say that they are all spins on the same answer.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anne Marie Devlin
    Favourite Anne Marie Devlin
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 11:38 AM

    @David Hanlon. I agree that the results have come out too late. However, if you look you will see that the highest number of exams that were marked wrongly apply to Ag Science and that was 1.8%. The total on average is 0.47%. That means that 99.53% of all papers were deemed to have been marked correctly. These figures refer to the overall number of exams corrected and not to the appeals.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute UM
    Favourite UM
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 6:09 PM

    6 weeks is far too long to have to wait for the appeal results.
    All college places have to be postponed till next year now.
    It’s very important for students waiting for appeals to accept a relevant course this year so that it might count for the original course they wanted eg taking science while your hoping for medicine

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mas Oyam
    Favourite Mas Oyam
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 8:51 AM

    Them percentages are all wrong

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Maria Woods
    Favourite Maria Woods
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 11:41 PM

    Did my leaving this year and failed business was shocked when I seen this so decided to view my papers , when I seen I got 38% I walked out of the room, it was the most frustrating thing ever since I did 9 months of grinds for 6th year luckily enough I got a course I’m enjoying but 2% off a pass is horrible to see

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rob Cahill
    Favourite Rob Cahill
    Report
    Oct 7th 2015, 12:30 PM

    what about the junior cert appeals when can we get the statistics on those?!

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds