Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRAN HAS SAID that US sanctions on its leaders represent the “permanent closure” of diplomacy with Washington.
The US imposed new sanctions against supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei yesterday, ahead of blacklisting Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif later this week.
US President Donald Trump also imposed new sanctions against top Iranian military chiefs, pressuring the country he has threatened with “obliteration” if a war breaks out.
The sanctions follow weeks of escalating tensions in the country, coming after US claims that Iran attacked two oil tankers in the region and Iran’s shooting down of a US spy drone last week.
After the sanctions were imposed, Iran said it would no longer deal with the White House diplomatically.
“Imposing fruitless sanctions against Iran’s supreme leader and the commander of Iran’s diplomacy is the permanent closure of the path to diplomacy with Trump’s desperate government,” the country’s ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi said in a tweet.
“Trump’s government is destroying all established international mechanisms for keeping global peace and security,” he added.
Trump called the new punitive measures “a strong and proportionate response to Iran’s increasingly provocative actions”.
A year after Trump unilaterally withdrew from a multilateral pact with Iran over its nuclear programme, tensions have flared with a series of attacks on tankers in highly sensitive Gulf waters.
Washington blamed the incidents on Iran, accusations which Tehran denies.
And after Iran shot down a US spy drone last week, Trump ordered a retaliatory strike on Iran but said he had called it off at the last minute.
During a visit to Jerusalem today, US National Security Advisor John Bolton also hit out at Iran’s apparent silence on an offer to negotiate with Washington.
“The president has held the door open to real negotiations,” Bolton said in a statement. “In response, Iran’s silence has been deafening.”
With reporting from - © AFP 2019
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Headline should read “opposition pushes policy they know will worsen housing crisis in order to get more votes”
@Tom D: The opposition are a bigger part of the problem by driving more and more small landlords out of the market with their populist anti landlord pie in the sky policies.
@Jim Connolly: Correct, students. It’s the people who never had control of anything that are the problem. Now, repeat.
@Jim Connolly: good man Jim Ur right that’s why rents are sky high even higher than mortgages but it’s the opposition’s fault
@derek doogan: correct, well founded fears of a SF Govt has led to 10s of thousands of landlords exiting the market.
@Tom D: as a proud landlord I’ll be voting for FG they are the only ones who seem to care about owning your own assets
@Proud Landlord: I’m with you there. FG are the only ones giving any support to people who want to work and have an asset that they can call their own and not be looking for handouts. There is no real party in Ireland now that represents self sufficient hard working citizens.
@Proud Landlord: the party that’s been in government for 12 years.. who has made all the decisions and created the mess. Because the problem is some others who never had power.
It really takes a special kind of special to fall for this, but landlords seem to readily eat it up. Bit of a pattern there really.
Looking for a winter ban is tokenism from opposition. They want to be able to paint government as anti renter. We don’t need eviction bans, we need tenants rights.
@Live from Ireland: to trash a house without consequence!
@Keyser Söze: SF/IRA and the rest of the looney left have nothing to offer. My assets means my rules
In most European countries renters have laws to protect against eviction.. they have secure contracts with some security of tenure. Here in Italy people get a 3 year contract initially, after that they are entitled to a 4 year tenancy..and so on . people can not be evicted during their contract,and rents can’t be increased beyond the cost of living index. There are a very few homeless people in Italy.
In other European countries there are similar laws to protect renters rights… it’s not rocket science for this government to look at some of the other EU countries and model a fair scheme suitable for Ireland. There can only be one reason why this is not happening…. they don’t care.
@Ronan Skelly: What happens if the tenant stops paying?
@Ronan Skelly: my house my rules
@David Corrigan: Balaclava and a baseball bat?
FF/FG government are the largest landlord members in the government outside of the vulture funds so nothing will be done to damage their profits.
@Albert John: SF/IRA is full of landlords. Think there needs to be an investigation into the unexplained wealth of SF/IRA members on the average wage….
We followed the RTB process to the letter.
It took 20 months to evict a non paying tenant.
Oh, and wheres the “tsunami of evictions” we were warned about?
@Paul: RTB should be disbanded, a useless quango that contribute nothing apart from being anti landlord.
@Paul: Really interested to know, did you eventually get paid the missing rent and your legal fees and indeed any material damages to the property.?
Re:Tenant Rights. There’s now an NCT for all HAP houses every four years which a LL must obey. But what of tenants? Should a tenant have an official documented history (not some sketchy phone number or letter reference) that a LL can refer to?
Well done to the government, the far left want to steal our assets. Finally some backbone by sticking up for the best people in our society
If a landlord gets a “Badun”, who doesn’t pay the rent for a year and it needs a further big lump of legal fees to get them out, what then.? The PTRB find in favour of the landlord, but has any landlord ever recovered the judgement sum.? If the tenant has it, he wouldn’t have been behind his rent in the first place.
Why do we not convert the RTB into a public version of Airbnb. It works. They take the rent, make a deduction. Pay the landlord monthly regardless while the tentant is there , and deal with any legals “in house. ” No more need for false “good bye” references.
If the Government guarantees the rent, or offers to buy the property from the landlord, then sure, bring in an eviction ban.
Otherwise it’s just a deadbeats paradise.
Out of touch apathetic sods!
@Joanne Stokes: that’s the far left clowns for you
Get out the door!
have your say