Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/BigTunaOnline

Report finds 'lack of consistency' in online political adverts during 2019 European elections

That’s according to ElectCheck, a new research report commissioned by the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland.

A REPORT LOOKING at the online political advertising during the 2019 European Election has found inconsistencies in how political and issue-based advertising was defined.

That’s according to ElectCheck 2019, a new research report commissioned by the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) and carried out by the Institute for Future Media and Journalism (FuJo) at DCU. 

The research examined the political advertising activity on Facebook, Twitter and Google during the 2019 European Election campaign, in the context of the platforms’ commitments in the self-regulatory Code of Practice on Disinformation, which aims to address the spread of online disinformation and fake news.

As part of the research, more than 1,500 political advertisements included in ad libraries and datasets provided by Facebook, Twitter and Google were monitored for the following information: 

  • Whether the advert was paid for
  • Who paid for it
  • If it carried a disclaimer stating that it was a political or issue-based avert
  • Information on micro-targeting
  • The amount spent for the advert

The report found that while some information relative to the research questions could be found from the supplied datasets, it was not possible to arrive at a clear, fully comprehensive picture of the native and scale of political advertising on Facebook, Twitter and Google. 

This was due to inconsistencies in the datasets. 

It also found that issue-based adverts – those concerned with campaigning issues, such as immigration and the environment, rather than election candidates or parties – were only labelled by Facebook. 

Twitter and Google did not identify issue-based adverts in their datasets. 

Recommendations

Commenting on the findings, FuJo director Jane Suiter said: “Online advertising offers an effective means of reaching target audiences, so it is unsurprising that it is now integral to any modern, political campaign.

“However, the lack of transparency presents significant risks and challenges and could potentially undermine the integrity of the electoral process.”

Suiter said the findings indicate that the digital platforms “have much room for improvements if they are to comply with their commitments under the Code of Practice on Disinformation”. 

BAI chief executive Michael O’Keeffe said the report indicates that the three platforms “actively engaged with their commitments to support electoral transparency”. 

However, it also shows a lack of consistency from platform to platform in how they presented the data and in how political and issue-based advertising was defined.

“To facilitate effective monitoring of political advertising and ensure full transparency, a clear and consistent regulatory approach is required, and policy-makers and regulators need to be equipped within their remits to respond adequately to the existing and emergency challenges in this regard.” 

FuJo has now made a number of recommendations to the Department of the Taoiseach’s public consultation on regulation of online political advertising in Ireland. 

These include the establishment of the Electoral Commission, the establishment of a searchable repository of online political advertising (which include information about adverts and their distribution), and enforcing a requirement to include imprints on all online political advertising to indicate who is responsible for creating the material. 

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
9 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Walsh
    Favourite Dave Walsh
    Report
    Sep 17th 2019, 10:50 AM

    It’s about control,” they” lost it when “social media” become the main means of getting information. The old bill board, state TV, way of getting out their message to the masses is dying. So now they’re using the old vilify it, then Control it. Be smart look at why…. they’re vilifying. Information is ammunition, knowledge Is Power.

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gavin Conran
    Favourite Gavin Conran
    Report
    Sep 17th 2019, 11:12 AM

    @Dave Walsh: Sure yeah…because the nonsense being posted on social media is “knowledge”

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Walsh
    Favourite Dave Walsh
    Report
    Sep 17th 2019, 11:19 AM

    @Gavin Conran: your Wright some of it is, but freedom of speech must include the b. S.

    17
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Robert Phelan
    Favourite Robert Phelan
    Report
    Sep 17th 2019, 11:21 AM

    Say no to internet censorship and control

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Kavanagh
    Favourite Michael Kavanagh
    Report
    Sep 17th 2019, 11:28 AM

    This is news?

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Thomas
    Favourite Thomas
    Report
    Sep 17th 2019, 4:43 PM

    Wow the journal and its deleting comments. The author is a troll.

    4
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds