Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
TD DENIS NAUGHTEN has said he has made no decisions about what way he will vote in tomorrow’s vote of no-confidence in Housing Minister Eoghan Murphy.
The Social Democrats tabled the motion of no confidence in the minister due to the government’s “failure to solve to the housing crisis”, according to party co-leader Róisín Shortall.
Due to the make up in Dáil numbers, Fine Gael has been forced to lobby independent TDs for their support ahead of tomorrow’s vote.
Speaking to TheJournal.ie, Naughten said this afternoon:
The former communications minister has traditionally supported his former Cabinet colleagues in crucial votes following his resignation last year.
Naughten stepped down following revelations about a dinner he had with the head of the National Broadband Plan (NBP) consortium.
In tomorrow’s vote, Fine Gael can rely on Fianna Fáil to abstain.
The confidence and supply arrangement between the two parties sets out that Fianna Fáil will abstain on crucial votes such as motions of no confidence as well as budget arrangements.
Looking at the numbers, there are 158 TDs. Fianna Fáil will abstain, as will the Ceann Comhairle.
Therefore, there are 112 voters. Of that number, the government needs 57 for a majority. Fine Gael members of government, including members of the Independent Alliance in government, only commands 54.
Fine Gael will have to look to Independents Michael Lowry, Noel Grealish, Denis Naughten and its former party member, Peter Fitzpatrick, for support.
Naughten is not the only TD that the government will be lobbying for support.
While Enda Kenny, as well as Leo Varadkar, have repeatedly stated that there is no deal between Lowry and Fine Gael, the Tipperary TD consistently supports the government, and is expected to do so tomorrow.
Fitzpatrick, a former Fine Gaeler, has also supported his former party members at times, but with election talk mounting, his support may not be caste iron.
Grealish is another TD that the government will be anxious to sign up.
There is an arrangement between Grelish and the government but this relationship has frayed in recent weeks after controversial comments were made by Grealish in relation to remittances sent to Nigeria and figures the TD highlighted in the Dáil.
Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe has since written to Grealish stating his disappointment in the TD. He later published the letter on the department’s website.
After the 2016 general election, the Galway West TD agreed to support the government during what he described as the “crucial stage” of Brexit talks.
“Ireland is now entering one of the most critical and uncertain phases since the foundation of our state and it is in the best interests of our country as a whole that we have a stable government at this crucial time,” he said at the time.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Meanwhile life goes on at Fukushima.
Only a matter of time when we will rue the day of nuclear power
I think the people of Pripyat already do.
Someday they will learn to handle it properly and safely…
“Someday they will learn to handle it properly and safely” — but what will the consequences be,
when they learn that?
It’s no trick being safer than coal. But what if it becomes safer than natural gas to provide the same power? Safer than natural-gas-plus-wind-turbines? It’s already less radioactively polluting than those systems.
When that superior safety shall be fact, a government that wants to take a billion dollars in natural gas severance taxes and/or royalties and/or import duties will have to accept the loss of some citizens to gas disasters in the bargain. If it allows nuclear energy to be used instead, those lives will be saved, but the billion will, from a civil service point of view, be lost: it will remain in private hands.
No-one will forthrightly deplore that result. Everyone’s official position will be that however good a few million dollars in tax revenue may be, it doesn’t justify an innocent citizen’s death.
But perhaps there will come to be a huge industry of denying that nuclear energy is a lifesaver, and of calling nuclear wrecks that harm no-one “nuclear disasters”.
Perhaps, eh?
Perhaps when the media makes accuracy the priority over profits.. but the scary word “nuclear” sells very well. The headline “Radiation from Fukushima has not caused any health effect” may be true, but it won’t catch peoples attention or sell advertising. They definitely don’t want people to know that fear of Fukushima radiation caused much more harm than the radiation itself, then they might be held accountable…….
Not a single person was killed when the water hit the Fukushima nuclear plant, in fact I have not heard of anyone even cutting their finger there. In comparison around 18,000 people from the surrounding area were swept away never to be seen again. But here on the Journal Fukushima is remembered as a a nuclear disaster. In the press hysteria trumps fact every time.
The tsunami left the enormous death toll,19000, not the incident at the nuclear power plant. The wording of this item is rubbish.
have your say