Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
AN INTERNATIONAL corporate and finance law company which advises international clients on the laws of global tax havens – including Ireland – is to create 75 new jobs in Dublin over the next three years.
Maples and Calder, which already employs 175 people in Dublin, is expanding its operations as a result of growing international demand as well as extra business generated by an affiliate fund administration company.
The 50-year-old firm, head-quartered in the Cayman Islands, advises international clients on the laws of its home country, Ireland and the British Virgin Islands.
The company first opened in Dublin in 2006, offering a full-service legal practice for Irish and international clients, as well as a specialised accounting and administration offshoot MapleFS.
The managing director of the firm’s Irish arm, Andrew Doyle, said the expansion would allow the company “to better serve our clients here as well as international clients who are carrying on business in and through Ireland”.
The jobs have been create in partnership with IDA Ireland, whose chief executive Barry O’Leary said the strength of the investment fund industry in Ireland was a major attraction firms like Maples. He said:
As the IFSC has gained critical mass as a global financial hub, international law firms, such as Maples, have been attracted to locate in Dublin both to service existing clients and to win incremental business.
Jobs minister Richard Bruton said the success of Maples’ Irish operations demonstrated “the potential for future growth in this sector, and through continued implementation of the Action Plan for Jobs we are determined to build on this and create the jobs we need”.
He added that the international financial services market was a key sector being targeted by the government’s jobs plans, and said the expansion of a company which had only moved into Ireland six years ago was “great news”.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
How about removing religion from having any involvement in schools.
I suspect that maybe Thats part of the idea behind this.
What’s the big problem with preferential treatment for siblings?
There’s no problem with siblings of current pupils – that just makes practical sense when it comes to drop offs and pick ups. However, there are a few issues with preferential treatment of siblings of past pupils – for example it puts children who have recently moved to an area at a big disadvantage when it comes to getting the school of their choice.
I don’t think this will work.
How about building schools in the area they extend houses in. Building a load of new homes in an existing area and not putting in new schools is just daft. putting in CAO style process is not going to solve the problem.
short term answer to a long term problem.
This article has really exasperated me! What the article fails to refer to re: the CAO is the points system. Are we going to ask 11 and 12 year old kids to compete for further education the way we ask 17 and 18 year olds? I realise the need for a fairer admissions system but lets keep the needs and welfare of the children as priority number one! The proposed system begs the question- what are our goals for our education system and facilities because if the kids have to qualify by showing they have certain skills which they are going to school to acquire then it seems we have lost the plot a bit! Anonomous addmissions by all means, competition for places among very young kids NO. Give them a chance to acquire the knowlegde and skills before firing that particular experience at them.
Hi Dearbhla,
I think the thrust of the idea is more so to base a system, similar to the CAO in terms of matching preferences for schools, on supply and demand of places rather than on the need for children to compete for those places based on terms of ability. The idea then being to give preference to those who specified a school as their first choice over those who may have listed that same school as a lower choice, in the event of a shortage of spaces to meet the demand.
“…prohibiting policies where schools can choose to prioritise the children or siblings of past pupils, or operate a ‘first come, first served’ model.”
“… allowances for families who have always lived in one school’s catchment area, but who may now find themselves muscled out if new homes have been built closer to that school, so that those families are not pushed out of their traditional school.”
So if you’re living in the same area for a number of years you probably will get priority, so the past pupil thing will kind of remain. This all doesn’t seem too clear at all at all.
I welcome Quinn’s willingness to try to redress the imbalance in the system. I wouldn’t be his greatest fan by any means. But, at least he’s trying.
In Sweden you get a form sent out when your child is due to start school. You get to list 3 preferences and places are allocated from a central system according to preferences and availability of spaces. Works well I found. Seems quite similar to this idea but I do think preference should be given to children living in the local area. We had a situation a couple of years ago when our son couldn’t get into a local secondary school here in Ireland as he didn’t have a parent a past pupil. He would have had to travel to a different town whilst in the local schools children living an hour away were getting in as their fathers had attended previously. Luckily one school decided to increase their intake that year and he got in, but it wasn’t until May the year he was due to start that he got a place. Very stressful.
Different kids chose schools for different reasons
Not all siblings would want to be in the same school as their older brother or sister but if they DO want to that should be given priority
My eldest daughter chose her new secondary based on the subjects available, the same range of subjects are not available in the school where most of her friends are going in September
The fact that she is now going to attend the school that I attended in my teens is coincidental but she would have been gutted if she had not received a place so i am delighted that being the daughter of a past pupil gave her an edge
Had I a son (Which i dont) that had the potential to be the next Henry Shefflin though, I would imagine he would want to attend St. Flannan’s college (home of hurling in Ennis). I would move to the other side of the town (over beside Flannans) if i needed to do so. Parents will always find a way to get themselves up the lists in schools where there is high demand
Ennis, has 5 secondary schools that i can think of
Only one is single sex, the rest are mixed and most have historically had feeder schools is this going to be abolished under this new system? I.E. Kids who attend a certain primary school generally follow into the associated second level
I do think that the admissions policy should be based on
1) Siblings of current pupils (for convenience for parents)
2) Children of teachers (for convenience of teachers Who are people too)
3) Siblings of past pupils (hand me down uniforms anyone?)
4) Proximity within a small town is one thing but in the country side kids having to drive past one school to get to another because they weren’t accepted into the first is simply silly
I would like to see
5) Children of past pupils (my parents payed for many of the facilities my old school now uses like the concert hall and the sports hall should my children not benefit from them too)
I know and understand that current economics dictate where parents have to live (i.e. where there is work) and I know how lucky I am to be still living in my home town
BUT i dont see why, if there is a school in town where generations of the same family have attended since the days of Adam, that the youngest kids of that family should be denied their place simply because it is not fashionable to allow family ties to give preference to places anymore
Totally agree Angela …
Yeah I think the biggest problem with this would have to be the complications involved in shuttling students from their homes to the schools. It’s fair enough for a university student to have to do so but it would be unfair to make thousands of young teenagers travel out of their local area, where there’s probably a local school. I think an easier solution would be to stream classes within the schools more effectively than is being done at the moment.
How would students be picked then, I’m sorry you Lego skills are not up to scratch you can’t go to school here, … Typical idiotic Irish idea
have your say