Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE BOMBSHELL NEWS that Britain’s Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle are to effectively quit their royal roles is splashed across every UK newspaper this morning.
The pair announced at about 6pm last night via their social media channels that they will be living between the UK as North America from here on out and no longer want to be senior royals
All the papers are reporting that Queen Elizabeth was not informed about the decision. Buckingham Palace last night issued a terse statement confirming Harry and Meghan’s “desire to take a different approach”.
The Daily Mail
The Daily Mail – whose sister publication, the Mail on Sunday, is also being sued by the couple – devoted its first 17 pages to the “astonishing statement” by the “rogue royals”.
Veteran columnist AN Wilson termed their exclusion of the queen “an atrocious lapse of judgment”, although he added that the “abdication” would strengthen the institution of the monarchy.
“The truth is that this charming, intelligent, beautiful woman hadn’t a clue what the monarchy really is, or what role minor members of the royal family have to play in public life,” Wilson wrote of Meghan.
“For his part, Harry perhaps didn’t fully understand his own role as a younger son. Both seemed oblivious to the fact that the British monarchy is a delicate constitutional miracle, not a vehicle for its members to press home their views on the subjects that interest them, however noble.”
The Sun
The Sun got a jump on everyone when it reported yesterday on its front page that Harry and Meghan were looking for a house in Canada with a view to moving there.
Today, the paper goes with the popular ‘Megxit’ moniker and report on ‘civil war’ within the royal family.
The Mirror
The Daily Mirror, one of three papers facing lawsuits from the couple, fumed in its coverage about “an extraordinary day in the history of the royal family”.
One comment piece in particular pulled no punches.
“Harry has selfishly turned his back on the institution she (the Queen) has fought to modernise and secure for him and his children,” Rachael Bletchly wrote.
“And he didn’t even have the guts or decency to tell her, or his own father, of the bombshell he was about to drop in their laps.”
The Daily Express
The Daily Express was relatively placid in its editorial, apart from highlighting the lack of family consultation.
Columnist Margaret Holder, however, said the couple have “consistently failed to understand that a tax-paying public expects the royal family to be relevant, relatable and value for money”.
“In trying to hide the place of Archie’s birth and refusing to name his godparents they pushed aside the public in a way not done by any other royals,” Holder wrote.
The Times
Over in the broadsheets, The Times carries a picture of the couple on its front page and also reports on the split within the royal family about their decision.
The paper’s editorial said the announcement carried all the signs of the “petulance and hot-headedness for which Prince Harry is sadly becoming well-known”.
“This latest outburst appears to have been triggered in part by anger at recent images released by the Palace that signalled a shift to a more slimmed down monarchy,” it said.
The Daily Telegraph
The Telegraph has the biggest photo of the couple on its front page and inform us that ‘Harry and Meghan quit the Firm’.
The paper also has details of some of the future arrangements for the couple, saying they will still have use of their UK residence in Frogmore Cottage in Windsor and “will continue to receive money from the Prince of Wales via the Duchy of Cornwall”.
The Guardian
The Guardian plays it pretty straight but also makes the royal announcement the biggest story on its front page.
The Financial Times
Even The Financial Times couldn’t resist putting the story further down on its front page, although naturally it had to find the money angle reporting: ‘Royal couple pull out of public eye in search of financial independence’.
New York Post
Given the couple have said they are going to go bicontinental by living on both sides of the Atlantic, US papers are also interested.
The New York Post had some fun with the royal announcement, saying Harry is going to ‘leave for commoner life’ and mocking him up with a few cans.
Chicago Tribune
Maybe the smartest reporting of the story comes from the Chicago Tribune who worked hard to find the local angle.
Markle studied theatre and international studies at a university outside Chicago, promoting the paper to tweet: ‘Northwestern graduate moving closer to home after spending time abroad’.
- With reporting by Press Association
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
What a non (I tried another word but it was perceived as toxic) story, half the country has been locked down even more so in the industries that sustain casualties. Almost as daft as the commentary about record recessions when the government shut down the country, shock horror & then the hype about record growth year on year when the government opened the economy back up & allowed folk to go back to making a crust, someone must have a blank page that need filling.
@Joe Thorpe: I accept your point. It is worth noting though that the Trump administration suppressed the reporting of work related death statistics, which had been required under the Obama administration. We could have a government that does something similar and thankfully we don’t. So I’m fine with having the statistics reported, even if it is an artificial low.
@David A. Murray: Well done you’ve somehow managed to bash trump in this news article it’s 2022 now come on just get over trump.
@Joe Thorpe: you obviously had a blank page that needed filling. Blank head too methinks.
@Joe Thorpe: there is no 2 ways about it sites are becoming safer and people are more self aware not to take risks. Regardless of lockdowns or not there’s people going home to their families who a few years ago would possibly lost their live doing the same job. 1 less life lost Regardless how is a result
The chances taken by small building contractors is directly contributing to these deaths especially the fall from height deaths. Two houses being built near me at the moment and both by two different contractors are disgraceful. The Scaffolding in particular…no hand rails, toe boards, access ladders, most sections only have one or two planks on them. Two scary things about it, 1 how the HSA let them get away with it, 2 how the contractors seem to just not care about their employees or even themselves.
@Ronan: Most of the lads at it have worked in the industry for years and with way less safety back then when they first started than now they’re probably so used to it they don’t see the danger.
@Ronan: are the HSA aware
@Ronan: those curtains must get awful greasy with your paws constantly twitching at them. If you’re so concerned why don’t you 1. Go and lend your massive scaffolding know how and a hand fixing it. 2. Stop making comments on a news article and go do something about it. Why make an effort when you can complain and say I told you so!
It’s because there are simply not enough HSA audits being carried out. I have worked on construction sites here for 35 years and only seen the HSA on two sites and on both occasions we were tipped off that they would be arriving. They were both on big site where generally safety would be better. It’s the small builder say building a few houses or maybe a small block of apartments that are a disgrace when it comes to health and safety. They should be getting regular unannounced audits from the HSA and this would focus them to run the sites better. Obviously down to lack of recourses and the builders know this.
Mostly due to lockdown but the HSA will be convinced that it’s due to their sill y over the top rules and regulations working as intended
@Quiet Goer: construction wasn’t loved down this year. March 2020 when it locked down
@Shaun Gallagher: it was actually last Christmas was extended to February. Unless it was council or 6 weeks from completion.
Half my team could be dead and I wouldn’t even know anymore with WFH, for all I know I could be talking to their kids over the keyboard.
have your say