Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Home page of the RIHL.

Man told he can't access government mortgage scheme because he's married

After initially being told he was eligible, the applicant was later told he wasn’t but argued there was no legal basis as to why.

A MAN WHO applied for a government-backed mortgage scheme under his name only was turned down because his wife is a non-EU national.

There are ten criteria that an applicant must satisfy to be eligible for the Rebuilding Ireland Home Loan (RIHL).

On his own, the man said he met all the criteria for the RIHL.

He applied for it as a sole applicant but was turned down and told a married person cannot apply for the mortgage on their own. 

He didn’t apply for the scheme with his wife because one of the criteria for applicants is an indefinite right to remain in Ireland either through nationality or refugee status. If he wasn’t married, he’d likely have been awarded the mortgage.

Rebuilding Ireland Home Loan

The RIHL is a government-backed mortgage for first-time buyers which you can avail of through your local authority. The buyers can use the loan to purchase a new or second-hand property or use it for a self build.

Crucially, it can offer up to 90% of the market value of the property making it an attractive option for those looking to get a mortgage who may not be able to save enough to meet the deposit requirements of a bank. 

People can apply as a single or joint applicants. Single applicants cannot have an income greater than €50,000 per annum. Joint applicants cannot have an income greater than €75,000.

There had been fears that the scheme was in danger of running out of funds last year as the government had underestimated the demand for the scheme

Earlier this month, the scheme increased its interest rates in a move the opposition described as “sneaky”. 

A Department of Housing spokesperson told TheJournal.ie that the RIHL “remains the most affordable mortgage on the market”. 

Situation

In an initial email, the applicant wrote to the Department of Housing to say he was interested in applying for a scheme and asked “may I apply as a single applicant even though I am married”.

He also pointed to his wife’s visa status in this email. His wife had only previously started new employment, and their combined income didn’t exceed the joint threshold for the scheme.

In response, a higher executive officer at the Department told him: “Yes you can apply as a single applicant. In this case only your income will be taken into account when deciding if you are eligible for the home loan.”

Although government-backed, the RIHL is administered and issued by the local authority of the applicant. 

This man applied through Dublin City Council. At an appointment with an officer from the council, he says he was told his application was “complete and generally correct”. 

However, he was told his application was not accepted because he was applying as a single applicant despite being married. 

He then went back and outlined what had happened to the department official he had initially dealt with.

That official replied: “Having re-read through your previous correspondence I now realise I provided you with incorrect information regarding the Rebuilding Ireland Home Loan. 

If you are married, you must apply for the Rebuilding Ireland Home Loan as a joint couple. I misunderstood your circumstances and without the full information to hand it is difficult to provide answers to queries such as this. It is for this reason that we encourage potential applicants to contact their local authority directly as part of the application process, and I apologise for this confusion. 

Not to be dissuaded, the applicant delved deeper into the issue asking to know on what basis he couldn’t apply as a single applicant. 

He found a case previously taken where a bank had refused a mortgage in similar circumstances.

In a case that came before the Equality Tribunal almost a decade ago, a man applied for a mortgage in his own name after the bank had originally told him his wife’s poor credit rating meant they were refused a mortgage when applying together. 

The man was then advised that he would not be able to get a mortgage in his sole name because he was married. The bank said it was “best practice” to lend to married couples jointly when it came to mortgages for a family home.

The Equality Tribunal ruled that the man had been discriminated against when he was turned down for the mortgage. 

“I am satisfied from the evidence that the respondent, in effect, operates a policy of not lending to a married person in their sole name where the mortgage security is the family home,” the adjudicator said.

The adjudicator added that the complainant “was discriminated against on the civil status ground”. 

The man was awarded €6,300 compensation, the maximum amount that could be awarded in the case. The adjudicator also made an order for the bank to ensure such a situation of discrimination didn’t happen again.

That case applied to a poor credit rating while this one with the RIHL case above sees a non-national without permanent permission to reside excluded from applying.

Turned down

Despite the applicant referencing this precedent in his request for his application to be considered, he was turned down for the RIHL.

In the decision from Dublin City Council, he was told: “As you are married you are not a single applicant and if applying for the RIHL, you must jointly apply with your wife.”

It was also pointed out that the council was awaiting instruction on whether it could accept Stamp 4 visa applicants on the scheme, and that even a joint application “could not be accepted at this time”.  Stamp 4 indicates permission to stay in Ireland for a specific period, and allows them to work.

The man got in touch with a solicitor who wrote to the council on his behalf, claiming he had been discriminated against on one of the nine grounds listed in the Equality Act 2000, i.e. his marital status. 

After a series of emails back and forth, an administrative officer from Dublin City Council wrote to the applicant to say that it was the instruction from the Department of Housing that single applications for married persons cannot be accepted.

“If the department inform the local authorities that individual applications from married persons are to be accepted then your application will be forwarded to the underwriter and credit committee for assessment,” the officer said.

The man then got back onto the department and asked what regulation or legal basis set out that the home loan couldn’t be given to a single applicant who’s married.

The department’s response was to say it was up to the local authority. 

“Under legislation, a local authority is independent in the performance of its functions and we are precluded from exercising any power or control in relation to any individual case with which a housing authority is or may be concerned,” it said. “We are therefore not in a position to comment on or deal with individual cases.”

In effect, the man was told by the council that it was a matter for the department. The department said it was a matter for the council.

Either way, he wasn’t getting approved for the mortgage. 

He submitted an FOI request asking for a basis on which they could refuse his application. He claimed there was nothing in the Housing (Rebuilding Ireland Home Loans) Regulations 2018 Act which prohibited a single person who’s married from being eligible for the scheme. 

In a lengthy response, six records were denied in the FOI request due to legal privilege and the man claims that there was nothing included that demonstrated why he was not deemed eligible.

He told TheJournal.ie: “Regardless of what the laws and regulations may or may not say, I find this to be a very discriminative practice. Given that I just married a few months before my RIHL application, my marriage was a really expensive endeavor. My advice would be to apply first to RIHL and then marry (eventually you can never know for sure if your spouse will be eligible or not).”

TheJournal.ie has contacted the Department of Housing and Dublin City Council for comment.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
55 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute mary carey
    Favourite mary carey
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 2:00 PM

    A sentence fitting for the crime. Unlike the nonsense that goes on here.

    1730
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris
    Favourite Chris
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 2:05 PM

    Sure if we were to lock ‘em all up for 90 yrs, where would all the poor lawyers, barristers , solicitors and judges make all their money??

    654
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Indigo Kid . . o_0 .
    Favourite Indigo Kid . . o_0 .
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 3:26 PM

    and work themselves out of a very well paid job? that’s not how the world works kitty…

    140
    See 4 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Glen
    Favourite Glen
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 4:29 PM

    Kitty
    They say that but they don’t mean it.
    Common sense tells you that.

    78
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute jason bourne
    Favourite jason bourne
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 4:43 PM

    Kitty you obviously don’t know too many lawyers if you think that. Either that or they’re lying to you.

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute North Korean General
    Favourite North Korean General
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 5:55 PM

    The jellyfish political parasites we have haven’t got the guts to pass laws that would punish evil sc@m.
    Statue licking clowns.

    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Natalie Stevenson-Sherrard
    Favourite Natalie Stevenson-Sherrard
    Report
    Apr 19th 2015, 8:46 AM

    Chris’s remark was tongue-in-cheek hence the work “sure” at the beginning.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute sonny black
    Favourite sonny black
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 2:02 PM

    90 years? .Now that’s a proper sentence.No mickey mouse judge handing out mickey mouse sentences in that court.

    479
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pilib O Muiregan
    Favourite Pilib O Muiregan
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 2:02 PM

    90 years in prisonis well deserved. I hate to think it but if this attack happened here, the sentence wouldn’t be 9 months.

    430
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Murray
    Favourite Dave Murray
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 3:09 PM

    With all of it suspended

    167
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Darby
    Favourite James Darby
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 10:02 PM

    Don’t forget Dave, there were 2 assaults so there would be 2 sentences, to run concurrently obviously.

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute maguire
    Favourite maguire
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 2:09 PM

    Wish that girl well ,encouragement , karma. Let’s get her ready for the wedding . Go girl go .

    309
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute saltaroo
    Favourite saltaroo
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 2:24 PM

    Absolute savage at least he will rot. Extremely courageous ladies. Hats off

    243
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Martello Mulligan
    Favourite Martello Mulligan
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 3:24 PM

    Stacy is a class lady. An example to all – what a friend she’s been. And maybe we should say in the most positive way: only in America. Most Americans have a real kindness and open heart which I’m sure our emigrants to US will affirm.

    156
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Vaibhav Borse
    Favourite Vaibhav Borse
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 2:31 PM

    Now, he has 90 years to think whether he will repeat it again….

    146
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Conor Cahill
    Favourite Conor Cahill
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 3:00 PM

    You know what? This is brilliant news that this whole case didn’t end in tragedy. Buckley’s case will haunt me for a while, but seeing that McShane is progressing well has never been more reassuring on the lives of Irish people abroad.

    96
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Cross
    Favourite John Cross
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 8:08 PM

    Makes the Irish system look pathetic , when you read during the week that a guy with 97 previous convictions attacked somebody with a bicycle lock causing them to lose sight in one eye gets 5 years with 2 suspended . What would you have to do in Ireland to get 90 years???

    75
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute McCrory จิมมี่
    Favourite McCrory จิมมี่
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 5:56 PM

    That girl is a class act and a true friend …. Fair play to her …. And awesome stuff on the recovery Natasha

    66
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris
    Favourite Chris
    Report
    Apr 18th 2015, 3:10 PM

    “Irrelevant bitterness” nothing irrelevant about soft sentences for wicked crimes and its perfectly natural to feel bitter if you see a murderer getting a laughably short sentence due to “mitigating circumstances”.

    63
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Keith Faherty
    Favourite Keith Faherty
    Report
    Apr 19th 2015, 1:00 AM

    90 years that’s a sentence.. If only criminals in Ireland who commit crime got half that

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frank Dowling
    Favourite Frank Dowling
    Report
    Apr 19th 2015, 9:11 AM

    You couldn’t commit enough crimes in Ireland to get 90 years no matter what despicable crimes you did.. There is no concept of justice in this country. . The softie lefties have taken over and now it’s all about rehabilitating the crims so much so that they have no fear and commit crime at will..

    8
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds