Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Google Street View

Owners in Dublin development hit with €18k bill each for fire safety repairs

The developer of the Linden complex is in receivership.

OWNERS OF PROPERTIES in a complex in Blackrock, Dublin, have been hit with a bill of €18,000 each to repair fire safety deficiencies at their homes.

The Linden complex was built in 1999 and consists of both apartments and houses. The developer, Capel Developments, has gone into receivership.

Owners have been advised that it may be too late now to pursue legal action against any of the firms involved in the development because deficiencies were only uncovered years after it was built. 

Nama appointed a receiver to Capel Developments in 2011 as it struggled with €100 million in debt. 

In 2017 there was a fire in one of the apartments at Linden. After an assessment by the insurance firm, various fire safety issues were noted and the insurer withdrew coverage.

Alternative insurance was obtained but in order to meet the conditions of the new insurance, the owners’ management company commissioned Crawford Architects to conduct a survey of the complex. 

In multi-unit developments, an owners’ management company (OMC) legally owns the common areas and is responsible for their upkeep. All property owners in a development legally become members of their OMC and can be elected to become a director.

The architecture firm hired by the OMC reviewed the fire certificates attached to the planning application for the development. It then compared the findings of its survey of the complex to those certificates as well as the relevant building codes. 

The main issued identified involved fire-stopping. Each apartment should essentially be its own separate fire rated unit, that protects residents for a required duration before a fire spreads into it from a neighbouring unit or a common area. 

Fire-stopping material blocks gaps and voids that would allow a fire to spread. The survey found that this material was missing in the majority of areas and where they were present, they had not been installed correctly and needed to be replaced. 

These fire safety deficiencies identified in the apartments were not found in the Linden houses. 

In December 2019 owners received an invoice from the complex’s management company for the levy of €18,000 and were told they could pay it all up front or set up a standing order within 60 days to pay it over 12 months minimum. 

Owners were told that the levy can be followed up in the same way as service charges, including using legal remedies and potential restriction of services or even restriction of access to the property as a last resort. 

One of the owners of an apartment in the complex, told TheJournal.ie that he and his wife will struggle to come up with the €18,000 required for the works. 

“How they think people have €18,000 when they already have mortgages on the properties is just bonkers. We were hit with this before Christmas and we were just like ‘what do we do?’”

He and his wife lived in the apartment for a number of years when they first purchased the property but moved when they wanted to start a family. He said they could not sell the apartment during the recession as they were in negative equity so they rented it out to tenants. 

I’m not going to start screaming on behalf of landlords, I’m not a big landlord by any means, but there are [rent] restrictions in place. Our main objective is to cover the mortgage – we do that – and we also have to pay the management fees, which the tenant doesn’t pay and everything else on top of that.

He said it would not be possible for them to sell the property until the deficiencies are addressed.

“We’re going to have to borrow from somewhere, I don’t have €18,000. I won’t say we’re cut to the pin of our collars, but we don’t have close to that kind of money”.  

Fire safety surveys

This development is just one of a number of complexes in which fire safety issues have been identified in recent years. 

After the Grenfell Tower fire in England, several developments across the country were surveyed. In some circumstances, developers involved in these developments are in receivership or have had their companies dissolved. 

Last month TheJournal.ie revealed residents at another apartment complex – Simonsridge in Sandyford, – were told it could cost them up to €14,000 each to repair the fire safety defects.

A survey of this development in Sandyford found a fire could spread and breach protected hallways within the apartments in less than 30 minutes. It also found that roof voids in the complex were not fire rated. 

Their first instalment of €1,000 for remediation works was due at the end of January. 

Legal action

At a meeting in May last year, owners at the Linden development in Blackrock were told by a solicitor hired by the OMC that the developer is in receivership. They were also told that one of the construction companies involved in the apartments is now dissolved. 

She told owners that the owners’ management company wrote to the second construction company, which is still in operation, but this firm had said its contract was with Capel Developments and not the OMC and it therefore had no liability. 

A letter was also issued to the architecture firm that certified that the complex was in compliance with building regulations.

This company, she said, stated that each owner would have had their own survey done and any claim would now be statute barred anyway. Owners were told that a case would usually have to have been taken within six years of the development’s construction. 

In a statement to TheJournal.ie, the board of directors of Linden owners’ management company said:

A survey of the apartment buildings was recently finalised which highlighted some remedial actions that were necessary to ensure the building is in compliance with fire safety obligations.
These works are to be carried out throughout 2020 /2021.

“This matter is being managed by the Board of Directors of the Owners Management Company which consists of Linden property owners. All owners in Linden have been fully consulted over a number of meetings. Core Estate Management act as agents only and are instructed by the Board.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
100 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cormac
    Favourite Cormac
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:05 PM

    Sentence is still too lenient. 4 times the legal limit, kills one person and paralysis for another.

    281
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gillian Weir Scully
    Favourite Gillian Weir Scully
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:53 PM

    I listened to the mother of Kate being interviewed on Newstalk and thought she was a lovely, brave woman going through a terrible time. She did not think it would serve any purpose a drunk driver going to prison. She asked that no one get into a car being driven by someone who had been drinking.

    We would all be safer if you drink but not drive.

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Niall O Neill
    Favourite Niall O Neill
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:16 PM

    “Out of line with other decided cases” – which clearly must have been too lenient as well! So judges perpetuate their inadequate sentencing because of precedent.

    228
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Teddington
    Favourite Teddington
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 2:17 PM

    It seems to be the very flawed system on which our entire legal system operates. Basically an original mistake gets extended forever.

    This again leaves a huge question mark over the severity of the sentence handed out yesterday to the ex fireman who had consensual sex with a 16 year old and got 7 years in prison. Murdering one person and paralysing another is only four years.

    109
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Deborah Behan
    Favourite Deborah Behan
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 2:38 PM

    You can’t have consensual sex with a minor. They cannot give consent. This, however, is a disgrace and no deterrent. Judges are totally out of touch with the real world.

    62
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen murphy
    Favourite Stephen murphy
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 8:52 PM

    If I had too much to drink, killed someone with a weapon and claimed it was an accident? What sentence would I get, If any and the judicial system is a joke in this country.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul
    Favourite Paul
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:04 PM

    As I said yesterday completely incompetent Judges…..joke

    207
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jon Mackey
    Favourite Jon Mackey
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:58 PM

    How the Fcuk is that allowed?

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen murphy
    Favourite Stephen murphy
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 8:54 PM

    Politicians allow it, they have a bar in their workplace and consume alcohol while working.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ken O'Neill
    Favourite Ken O'Neill
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:19 PM

    They should have doubled his sentence for having the neck to appeal. Outrageous decision.

    173
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute brian o'leary
    Favourite brian o'leary
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:54 PM

    This country and its judicial system are an absolute joke. What kind of an example does this give. 4 years for what he did. His first sentence was too lenient in my eyes.
    An embarrassment

    96
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Leon O Haodhagain
    Favourite Leon O Haodhagain
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 2:23 PM

    Wonder if I paralysed a judges daughter would I just get the 1 year?

    94
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Babadook
    Favourite Babadook
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:33 PM

    Hold on went from seven to four years. He should of been dragged out and shot.

    77
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Periguin
    Favourite Periguin
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:59 PM

    Can this also set a precedent,for appeal, for that drink drivers sentence last week? On the basis of this, what sentence should have been imposed on the idiot in Donegal. The judiciary in this country is a shambles.

    61
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rasputin
    Favourite Rasputin
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 2:50 PM

    The problem seems to be that there is no central authority issuing guidelines so you have each judge in their own little fiefdom sentencing people according to their own interpretation of the law. We really need minimum sentences and a system where if a judge feels that a particular case warrants a lesser sentence due to mitigating circumstances the case is referred to a higher court.

    27
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute shelly
    Favourite shelly
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 2:18 PM

    There should be a mandatory minimum sentence for anyone who kills or maims another person by driving while drunk. Say 12 years and lifetime ban from driving with no chance of appeal, this would act as a good deterrent.

    55
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ken Kelly
    Favourite Ken Kelly
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 2:21 PM

    €206877
    This is how much the state will save by this appeal. Its in the states interest to grant these appeals. This is why we have laughable sentencing laws. The state is far more interested in money than its citizens. We have seen this again and again. Money trumps life.
    http://www.iprt.ie/prison-facts-2

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Barney r
    Favourite Barney r
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 8:41 PM

    How much will the paralysed women receive for care help?

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jon Mackey
    Favourite Jon Mackey
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 2:13 PM

    If only Dexter Morgan was real

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Niall Dawson
    Favourite Niall Dawson
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 3:36 PM

    Is that judge off his nut? If anything the original sentence was too lenient!

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan Scott
    Favourite Alan Scott
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 4:38 PM

    It shows the courts are getting more comfortable with this type of crime hence the low sentence

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jimmy Murphy
    Favourite Jimmy Murphy
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 4:13 PM

    So they’re trying to extend the sentence in that Donegal case while reducing the sentence in this one? Does our legal system have any clue what it’s doing?

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anne Shanahan
    Favourite Anne Shanahan
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 4:57 PM

    Another nonsense sentence for causing such devestation due to being an idiot behind the wheel driving drunk. These judges are clearly blotto when they hand down these terms.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sallins Man
    Favourite Sallins Man
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:13 PM

    Who cares what you said.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ken O'Neill
    Favourite Ken O'Neill
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 1:20 PM

    F*ck off troll.

    67
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute jack frost
    Favourite jack frost
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 7:07 PM

    10 years . End of story

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ger Kelly
    Favourite Ger Kelly
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 11:26 PM

    Sentencing in this country especially for drink driving road accidents are a disgrace.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Randall Higgins
    Favourite Randall Higgins
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 7:57 PM

    A central tenet of democracy is that the branches of Government must be independent of each other. The executive enacts legislation and the judiciary interprets the wording of a given statute when it is tested by way of using it to prosecute a crime. The judges’ interpretation becomes a precedent for other cases of a similar nature into the future. This is called “common law” and is equally as binding as legislation, and is used throughout the land. Sentencing is limited by a variety of factors: legislation, “mandatory sentencing”, and the concept of “fairness.” This chap’s sentence has to be proportionate to those who previously did similar and with a similar outcome. The Victim Impact Statement serves no function other than to give the victims a voice (make them “feel better”.)

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Spiderman
    Favourite Spiderman
    Report
    Nov 17th 2015, 11:18 PM

    Excuse the language but that’s a FN joke. No justice here at all.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds