Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Sam Boal via RollingNews.ie

Social distancing rules for Covid-19 are based on outdated science, researchers argue

That’s according to research published in medical journal the BMJ.

RULES WHICH SPECIFY a single physical distance (one or two metres) between individuals to reduce the spread of Covid-19 are based on outdated science and experiences of past viruses, researches have argued in the BMJ journal. 

Such rules are based on an over-simplistic dichotomy describing viral transfer by either large droplets or small airborne droplets released in isolation without accounting for the exhaled air, Nicholas Jones at the University of Oxford and colleagues have claimed.

In reality, transmission is more complex, involving a continuance of droplet sizes and an important role of the exhaled air that carries them, they explain.

The researchers say evidence suggests that smaller airborne droplets containing Covid-19 can travel more than two metres by activities such as coughing and shouting, and may spread up to seven to eight metres concentrated in exhaled air from an infected person.

As a result, they say social distancing rules need to take account of the multiple factors that affect risk, including type of activity, indoor versus outdoor settings, level of ventilation, and whether face coverings are worn. 

The viral load of the person infected, duration of exposure, and susceptibility of an individual to infection are also important, they add. 

“This would provide greater protection in the highest risk settings but also greater freedom in lower risk settings, potentially enabling a return towards normality in some aspects of social and economic life,” they write. 

The researchers discuss how transmission risk may vary with setting, occupancy level, contact time, and whether face coverings are worn. 

They say, for example, in the highest risk situations, such as a crowded bar or nightclub, physical distancing beyond two metres and minimising occupancy time should be considered, while less stringent distancing is likely to be adequate in low risk scenarios.

The researchers say further work is needed to examine areas of uncertainty and extend the guide to develop specific solutions to classes of indoor environments occupied at various usage levels.

“Physical distancing should be seen as only one part of a wider public health approach to containing the Covid-19 pandemic,” the researchers conclude.  

“It should be used in combination with other strategies to reduce transmission risk, including hand washing, regular surface cleaning, protective equipment and face coverings where appropriate, strategies of air hygiene, and isolation of affected individuals.”

At present, people in Ireland are being asked to keep a space of two metres between themselves and others outside of their household. 

When it is difficult to keep two metres from others in public places, people are asked to wear a face covering. 

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
34 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Honey Badger
    Favourite Honey Badger
    Report
    Jun 11th 2019, 9:19 AM

    Terrible Terrible news. RIP

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Adolf Galland
    Favourite Adolf Galland
    Report
    Jun 11th 2019, 9:21 PM

    @Honey Badger: Thought you were a racist?

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fabian Lee
    Favourite Fabian Lee
    Report
    Jun 11th 2019, 9:43 AM

    Were the passengers provided with or wearing life jackets?
    They might have had some chance if they had.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dan
    Favourite Dan
    Report
    Jun 11th 2019, 9:47 AM

    @Fabian Lee: they were inside due to it raining. It flipped so fast they had no chance. Very sad..RIP

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Johannes Baader
    Favourite Johannes Baader
    Report
    Jun 12th 2019, 1:54 AM

    @Fabian Lee: You didn’t follow the news at all …. but thank you for this enlightening comment. Nearly as idiot as Trumps comment to get planes in to extinguish the fire at Notre Dame in Paris

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute William Kelly
    Favourite William Kelly
    Report
    Jun 12th 2019, 6:44 AM

    I thought the bigger cruiser had the right of way, & that the smaller vessel seemed to be crossing the main shipping lane.
    Also looks as if life jackets were left unused on the vessel that sank.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds