Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
UK PRIME MINISTER Boris Johnson has said he is due to have his Covid-19 vaccine shortly and it will “certainly be Oxford/AstraZeneca”.
In an effort to support for the jab, Johnson said the fact he is getting it is “the best thing I can say” about it.
It comes as more than a dozen European countries including Ireland have temporarily stopped using vaccine. Johnson told MPs today:
I think perhaps the best thing I can say about the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine programme is that I finally got news that I’m going to have my own jab very shortly, I’m pleased to discover…It will certainly be Oxford/AstraZeneca that I will be having.
56-year-old Johnson is in Cohort 8 of the UK’s roll-out order. Cohort 9 represents those aged 50 to 54 and those in England in that group are now being formally invited to get their Covid-19 vaccine.
Just over 47% of adults in the UK have now had one dose of a jab.
Johnson’s comments came as European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen suggested that exports of coronavirus vaccines could be halted to countries with higher vaccination rates.
In what could be seen as a reference to the UK, she told reporters in Brussels: “We are exporting a lot to countries that are themselves producing vaccines and we think this is an invitation to be open, so that we also see exports from those countries coming back to the European Union.
“The second point that is of importance to us: we will reflect on whether exports to countries who have higher vaccination rates than us are still proportionate.”
Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine doses for Europe including the UK are being produced in BioNTech’s German manufacturing sites, as well as in Pfizer’s manufacturing site in Belgium.
The comments came after a leading UK expert said people across Europe will die from Covid-19 as a direct consequence of the decision to halt rollout of the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Professor Jeremy Brown, from the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), said the move by several European countries to suspend the vaccine over blood clot fears was “not sensible” and was “not logical”.
He told Good Morning Britain: “There is the concern that what’s happening in Europe might make people in the UK less confident in the AstraZeneca vaccine, unnecessarily so, because it’s perfectly safe.”
The vaccine has been given to around 11 million people in the UK “and there’s been no serious side effects reported in this country,”, he added.
It is confusing to understand why so many countries have decided to stop using the vaccine Many of those countries are going through a third wave, and by stopping using the vaccine they’re actually literally causing more problems.
“By not using the vaccine, this is going to directly lead to an increased incidence of Covid infection and people will die as a consequence of these decisions.”
The European Medicines Agency is continuing to carry out its investigation into the vaccine after reports of rare blood-clotting events but but has said it is ’firmly convinced’ benefits of AstraZeneca vaccine ‘outweigh the risks of the side effects’
Sweden and Latvia have followed countries including Germany, France, Italy, Ireland and Spain in temporarily suspending AstraZeneca jabs in light of a small number of reports of bleeding, blood clots and low blood platelet counts.
Some of the focus has been on Germany, where officials have received seven reports in total of bleeding and a form of severe cerebral venous thrombosis associated with low platelets.
Of the seven people, three have died, and all were aged between 20 and 50, officials said.
Six of the people had a particular form of cerebral venous thrombosis, called sinus vein thrombosis, and all of these were “younger to middle-aged women”.
Prof Brown said he did not believe clots reported in Germany “will turn out to be linked to the vaccine anyway – this is an incredibly rare event”.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) also again reiterated its belief that vaccination with Astrazeneca continues but that it is “good practice” to investigate potential adverse events.
“WHO considers that the benefits of the AstraZeneca vaccine outweigh its risks, and recommends that vaccinations continue,” it said in a statement.
- With reporting by Press Association
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Wouldn’t be one bit surprised if our lot already had the vaccine on the sly.
@Leonard Barry: only in your head.
@Leonard Barry: Nothing wrong with that. If your running the country you should have the jab.
The Brits are doing it right, not like our lot.
@Michael Maher: you have a very short memory.
@Michael Maher: With one of the worlds highest death rates?
@Michael Maher: How do you make that out. They have more vaccines but have pushed the second dose out from two weeks to whatever without medical advice to get the headlines. Typical of them under boris
Where in the real world we have the second highest amount of people percentage wise vaccinated.
@Michael Maher: You cannot be serious…
@Michael Maher: wrong! Check again. They will be in short supply from March 29 and having made a complete and utter mess at the start of the pandemic, they politicised the vaccine rollout. While 25m have received their first dose, only 1.2m have received the second dose.
@Gary Kearney: What do you mean by ‘without medical advise’. Do you think that these decisions are made in the pantry of No.10? I’d be fairly sure they were presented with several medical interventions to a serious problem they had and ran with one which thankfully appears to be working. Stop making spurious comments on this please.
@Michael Maher: Would agree with you on that. Like or loathe them at least they are ‘Doers’. Not like here thinking, talking , forming strategies about the ‘Best way forward’ nonsense.
Maybe its within them from multiple war mobilisation experience.
@Gavin Linden: no they certainly took a risky decision, but to be fair it paid off. They stretched the doses to 12 weeks and only after that did AstraZeneca decide to investigate the second dose spacing finding that the shorter spacing they first recommended gave a less effective vaccine than that of 6+ weeks spacing. So the UK govs decision actually made the AstraZeneca vaccine more effective. Just strange that a finding like that would be found in circumstances like that and not in the original trial periods.
@Paul Furey: Don’t be daft
@John: Very.
@Michael Maher: disagree
@Fergal Doyle: OK
Boris had Covid already so he is likely to be still immune from that anyway. It’s a rather pointless staged event and reminds me of John Gummer, British agriculture minister during the mad cow crisis in the 90s. He attempted to refute the growing evidence for mad cow disease by feeding his four-year-old daughter Cordelia a burger in front of press cameras.
@Sean: boris had covid almost 12 months ago and I thought they now think 8 months is the timeframe for lasting immunity from natural infection. So maybe not that likely he is still immune.
@NotMyIreland: at least 8 months and possibly longer the study found. Obviously difficult for the study to find people who had contracted Covid three years ago since it want around.
@Sean: no but no 14 months ago either when it definitely was. And cases of reinfection have happened after 8 months. Its probably going to end up in line with most other coronavirus at around 8-16 months depending on individual immune systems. But at the 12 month mark it certainly makes sense for him to be vaccinated, especially as he was fairly ill the last time.
@NotMyIreland: regardless, the second infection will almost certainly be less of a impact than the first.
@NotMyIreland: he is immune to criticism and common sense
And this is news because…
@Maalouf: Because it’s novel and it’s noteworthy.
@Derek Walsh: not really
I’ve heard a few reports from healthcare staff in the UK that they are seeing the stronger type of vaccine reactions in people who had already being infected naturally. Interesting to see if that is actually the case when Boris gets it.
Good for you
Surely he should take whichever vaccine the NHS tell him to take rather than selecting one himself??
Did he not have the virus over 6 months ago and was hospitalised. Should he not have antibodies?
A little pric (k) going into a big pric (k)
have your say