We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
LAST UPDATE | 11 May 2021
AN INQUEST INTO the shooting dead of 10 people in west Belfast almost 50 years has found that the people killed were “entirely innocent”.
The events over three days in August 1971 have become known as the Ballymurphy Massacre.
Coroner Mrs Justice Siobhan Keegan attributed nine of the ten shootings to the British Army and said the use of lethal force by soldiers was not justified.
A solicitor who represents the Ballymurphy families said they have instigated civil proceedings against the Ministry of Defence.
There were jubilant scenes outside Belfast’s International Convention Centre today after the verdicts were read out.
“We have fought long and hard for this, for 50 years, to declare my daddy an innocent man,” Eileen McKeown, the daughter of Joseph Carr told reporters.
Original inquests into the Ballymurphy deaths in 1972 returned open verdicts and the bereaved families subsequently pursued a long campaign for fresh probes to be held.
Fresh inquests into the deaths began in 2018, with the final oral evidence heard last March.
The verdict was read today by coroner Mrs Justice Siobahn Keegan and focused on five separate incidents with family members applauding at several points during the ruling.
Incident one
In respect of the first incident, the coroner said Fr Hugh Mullan and Frank Quinn were killed by shots fired by soldiers and that the force used was not justified.
She said she was satisfied both entered the field to assist an injured man.
While the coroner said there was evidence of a small number of IRA gunmen in the wider area on the day, she said this did not apply to the waste ground when the men were shot.
She said neither man was armed and they were not in the vicinity of someone with a gun.
Mrs Justice Keegan said there was evidence that the priest had been waving a white item, either a handkerchief or T-shirt.
She said the use of force used by the Army was disproportionate in the circumstances, further noting the soldiers were firing from protected positions from a long distance away and the fact there were many civilians in the field fleeing from violence that was unfolding elsewhere.
She said the state had failed to demonstrate that its use of force had been justified.
The coroner also rejected a suggestion from the UK’s Ministry of Defence that the men may have been shot by a UVF sniper from the nearby Springmartin area.
Mrs Justice Keegan said she had been unable to identify which soldiers fired the fatal shots.
Incident two
In regard to incident two, Mrs Justice Keegan again found that the killings of Noel Philips, Joseph Murphy, Joan Connolly and Daniel Teggart were not justified.
She said the victims were “innocent” and unarmed.
“The Army had a duty to protect lives and minimise harm, and the use of force was clearly disproportionate,” she said.
In regard to Mr Teggart, she rejected an allegation from one military witness that ammunition was found in his pockets.
She said there was no evidence to suggest any of the deceased were linked to the IRA.
The coroner said there were IRA gunmen in the area at the time.
She said there had been a “basic inhumanity” in how long Mrs Connolly had been left to lie injured on the ground. However, she said she could not determine whether the delay in treatment had contributed to her death.
Mrs Justice Keegan also ruled out a theory that Mr Murphy had been shot again by soldiers when he was taken inside the hall.
The coroner said the four deceased had been killed by British soldiers shooting from the Henry Taggart Hall and she said ballistics evidence disproved that they had been shot by the UVF.
She said she could not determine who fired the shots, other than they were members of the Parachute Regiment stationed at the Henry Taggart Hall.
Third incident
In the third incident, the coroner ruled the use of force in shooting Eddie Doherty was disproportionate.
She also rejected claims that Mr Doherty had been throwing petrol bombs at the time.
“He was an innocent man who posed no threat,” she said.
The soldier who fired the shot that killed him was in a tractor that was attempting to clear the barricade.
The coroner said she accepted that at least two petrol bombs had been thrown at the tractor and that the soldier inside would have held an honest belief that his life was in danger, and was justified in using some force as a consequence.
But she said his actions went beyond that.
“On any reading he acted in contravention of the Yellow Card (Army’s rules of engagement),” she said.
The coroner added: “The use of force was disproportionate to the risk posed to him.”
Incident four
On the fourth incident, the coroner said the military had failed to establish an adequate justification for the use of lethal force in killing Joseph Corr and John Laverty.
She concluded they were shot by the British Army and there was no evidence that they could have been shot by anyone else.
The coroner rejected claims the men were gunmen who had been firing at soldiers.
“There is no evidence that guns were found on or near any of these two men,” she said.
The coroner added: “It was wrong to describe these two men as gunmen and that rumour should be dispelled.”
The coroner also raised concerns about “serious failings” in military testimony provided in respect of the shootings.
Incident five
In the fifth incident, the coroner said John McKerr was an entirely innocent man.
However, she said there was not enough evidence for her to determine where the shot that killed him came from, or whether it was fired by the military or paramilitaries.
“It is impossible to say where shot may have come from,” she said.
“The evidence is not consistent and clear in this case.”
The coroner said it was “shocking” there was no adequate investigation of the killing afterwards.
She added: “I have no hesitation in stating that Mr McKerr was an entirely innocent man.”
The coroner said he was “shot indiscriminately on the street”.
She noted that Mr McKerr was a “proud military man” and claims he was associated with the IRA had caused great pain for his family in the five decades since.
“I can allay that rumour and suspicion once and for all,” she said.
Internment
The shootings occurred during a period of civil unrest across Belfast and Northern Ireland following the introduction of internment in the early hours of 9 August 1971, which was codenamed by the British Army as Operation Demetrius.
Violence erupted as British soldiers moved into republican areas to detain people they claimed were IRA suspects.
The families of those killed contend they were innocent, unarmed civilians shot by soldiers without justification, among them were a mother of eight and a Catholic priest.
Families of those killed are due to speaking outside the Waterfront Hall this afternoon.
Responding to the findings, Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Coveney described the ruling as “historic” and said that all bereaved families an must have access to “an effective investigation and to a process of justice”.
“The principal findings have cast a tremendous new light on one of the darkest pages of the history of the conflict, and will come as an immense relief and vindication for the families who have maintained for decades that their loved ones were innocent and their killings unjustified,” he said.
“Today’s historic developments wouldn’t have been possible without the determined campaign by the families of those killed in Ballymurphy for the truth of what took place in those terrible days in August 1971.”
Every family bereaved in the conflict must have access to an effective investigation and to a process of justice regardless of the perpetrator. All victims’ families deserve support in securing all the information possible about what happened to their loved ones.
He added: “Only through a collective approach can we hope to deal with these issues comprehensively and fairly, and in a way that responds to the needs of victims and survivors, and society as a whole.”
Tweeting following the verdict, Sinn Fein’s Deputy First Minister Michelle O’Neill said: “The victims and the families of the Ballymurphy Massacre have been vindicated and the truth laid bare. This was British state murder.”
Alliance Party Justice Minister Naomi Long said:
“The Ballymurphy families have had battle too hard and too long to finally hear that truth at today’s inquest ruling into their loved ones’ deaths. They have carried themselves with courage and fortitude throughout the last 50 years. This is vindication of their fight.”
- With reporting by Rónán Duffy
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I’m generally not a green freaky type but I do value life in its entirety, no, not vegan either lol. This, to me, is senseless waste of life, leading to extinction of life forms, and for what. It’s not like it’s helping world hunger. It’s so very sad and those responsible should feel great shame.
@Anna Carr: “and for what”? it makes money for for people and makes the big co-ops lots of money.
@Anna Carr: genuine question but why do Irish people see green people as freaks or vegans as a joke?
@Lad: I’m not sure about green, but the opinion about vegans, I dare say it’s the inability to grasp a concept differing from what they and their parents grew up with. Possibly also the refusal to even consider in the slightest the thought of learning new skills and change the way of earning income. Who knows. I’m often thinking about a story my grandmother told me when I was young.
A man had trained as an apple picker and for 20 years made a good living reaching up into the trees harvesting apples. Then the orchard burned down due to a terrible wildfire and work was only available in the neighbouring town, and only as a potato harvester. The man refused the work because after 20 years of reaching up into the apple trees, he didn’t want to learn how to bend down to pick up potatoes. And so he got no work and died of hunger.
The ability to look towards the future, to learn skills that are in demand and that actually have a future, is what I often see totally lacking in people here sadly. So much about a mind set speculation.
As to the article, I’m as usual totally amazed at the short sightedness of everybody involved. Instead of looking over the brim of the bowl and seeing the whole (our seas and oceans on this planet), talk is about this little part of it. If I were sarcastic, I would say, fear not, for in a small decade the oceans will be dead zones, there’ll be no fish to catch, and the air quality on our planet will be so bad that survival will be questionable. Yes, the oceans are a larger oxygen provider than the rain forests. Everyone intelligent enough to have seen Seaspiracy et al. and understood what was aid and shown, knows the solution to the problem. Nobody can do everything, but everybody can do something.
Opinions are like noses. Everybody has one. And that’s my opinion. No need for verbal abuse if you have a different one.
The pillaging of the sea continues unabated.
The biggest virus on this planet is the human race.
@Patrick Corr: That’s an insult to viruses. They normally don’t kill their host.
Seaspriacy a must watch on Netflix, very factual about sea vessels and the damage they cause the sea life.
@Sadie b: agree seaspiracy is a documentary everybody needs to see urgently! A revolution is needed before we destroy the oceans.
@Sadie b: if the oceans die then we die. Industrial fishing the biggest polluter on the planet and speeding up the path to self destruction. Agree seaspiracy is a must watch
@MB: No revolution needed, just an amending of eating habits.
@Sadie b: I watched Seaspiracy and think each individual section should be addressed separately. Below is a view by Ray Holborn who is respected internationally by many on both sides of the debate.
@Brendan Barry: Ray Hilborn has a vested interest and his points are so totally out of date and off the mark, I doubt anybody with an open mind would agree with him. The argument of animals being killed in crop farming has been refuted years ago due to it’s incorrect relation as proven by scientific studies and evidence. And he really misses the mark when he talks about well managed fisheries. What Seaspiracy is showing (amongst other things) is the devastating impact of the gigantic fishing fleets. The native people doing coastal fishing for their dinner in Africa or in the Pacific are certainly no threat to the oceans.
What Hilborn totally ignores is the point of unnecessary and intentional suffering and killing. Just saying.
A very interesting but depressing report. So we are told to lay off criticising the fishermen for the vast numbers of creatures suffering as by-catches as they will stop reporting them. Who’s to say they are reporting accurately anyway? The figures could be much greater and we will only know when endangered species have disapeared altogether. Nobody is there to see what is actually happening on these boats. I fear that like so much legislation meant to protect our struggling planet new regulations will be either ignored or go unenforced.
@Pat Forster: perhaps cameras on every vessel in the Irish Sea, accessible by a monitoring agency? It would be a huge operation, but to allow these guys do what they want and self report is crazy!
@Padraig O’M: Absolutely not! I’d imagine a large amount of super trawlers have cameras on board and there I can agree that companies should be obliged to show evidence that they observe practise on board their vessels and ensure it’s moral. There are fishermen who do not cause harm at all to the environment and entire communities who rely on people like these hardworking people of goodwill for fish. Small trawlers operated by father and son or whatever should not be effectively stalked by the government or any agency. That would also cost millions for the infrastructure alone and monitoring each vessel would require hundreds of staff. What is essential is that the European Union’s opinion on what our national territorial waters are is not listened to. The navy should not have ships stuck in dry dock half of the year because of poor pay. The pay must be increased so that our naval officers can protect Irish waters from foreign super trawlers, who probably aren’t familiar in the first with Irish maritime law.
We have a fantast fisheries here and we allow it to be raped and pillaged by foreign fishermen. And I know people will say we get money from the eu. Money cant be eaten. We giving future generations food away purely out of greed
The EU have only just begun trawling our waters. #KillingUsSlowly
Good to hear of better monitoring of discards. I’d like the idea of cameras on every shipping vessel and personally think a government representative should be on every trawler to document all activities. Be nice if we could start being more proactive with our great sea resource.
The answer is quite simple – so simple in fact that ye will all reject it in an attempt to keep the status quo.
Stop abusing animals – all animals – if you love your dog/cat then love chickens/cows/pigs.
You can look down on Vegans all you like but that is the plain and simple path – Save Lives – Go Vegan
The average person feels very helpless in the face of all this .We know that the ocean will eventually be destroyed by pollution ,plastic, over fishing etc etc bu what to do .And indeed by all accounts any attempt to challenge the status quo brings swift reprisals .
DON’T EAT FISH .and never will again after seeing Seaspiracy
have your say