Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Ricky Fitchett via PA

Bill Cosby released from prison after US court quashes his sex assault conviction

District attorney Kevin Steele said Cosby went free “on a procedural issue that is irrelevant to the facts of the crime”.

Updated 1 July*

A US COURT has thrown out Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction and released him from prison, ruling that the prosecutor who brought the case was bound by his predecessor’s agreement not to charge the TV star.

The 83-year-old flashed the V-for-victory sign to a helicopter overhead as he walked into his suburban Philadelphia home after serving nearly three years of a three to 10-year sentence for drugging and violating Temple University sports administrator Andrea Constand in 2004.

In a statement, Constand and her lawyers called the ruling disappointing, and expressed fear that it could discourage sexual assault victims from coming forward. “We urge all victims to have their voices heard,” they added.

The former Cosby Show star was arrested in 2015, when a district attorney armed with newly unsealed evidence — the comic’s damaging deposition in a lawsuit brought by  Constand — brought charges against him days before the 12-year statute of limitations ran out.

But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said district attorney Kevin Steele, who made the decision to arrest Cosby, was obliged to stand by his predecessor’s promise not to bring charges. There was no evidence that promise was ever put in writing.

Justice David Wecht, writing for a split court, said Cosby had relied on the former district attorney’s decision not to charge him when the comedian gave his potentially incriminating evidence in Constand’s civil case.

The court called Cosby’s arrest “an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was forgone for more than a decade”.

The justices said that overturning the conviction, and barring any further prosecution, “is the only remedy that comports with society’s reasonable expectations of its elected prosecutors and our criminal justice system”.

As Cosby was set free from the state prison in Montgomery County, his appeals lawyer, Jennifer Bonjean, said he “should never have been prosecuted for these offences”.

“District attorneys can’t change it up simply because of their political motivation,” she said, adding Cosby remains in excellent health, apart from being legally blind.

He later tweeted an old photo of himself with his fist raised and eyes closed, with the caption: “I have never changed my stance nor my story. I have always maintained my innocence. Thank you to all my fans, supporters and friends who stood by me through this ordeal. Special thanks to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for upholding the rules of law.”

In a statement, Steele said Cosby went free “on a procedural issue that is irrelevant to the facts of the crime”.

He commended Constand for coming forward and added:

My hope is that this decision will not dampen the reporting of sexual assaults by victims. We still believe that no one is above the law — including those who are rich, famous and powerful.”

“FINALLY!!!! A terrible wrong is being righted — a miscarriage of justice is corrected!” the actor’s Cosby Show co-star Phylicia Rashad tweeted.

“I am furious to hear this news,” tweeted actor Amber Tamblyn, a founder of Time’s Up, an advocacy group for victims of sexual assault. “I personally know women who this man drugged and raped while unconscious. Shame on the court and this decision.”

Four judges formed the majority that ruled in Cosby’s favour, while three dissented in whole or in part.

Even though Cosby was charged only with the assault on Constand, the trial judge allowed five other accusers to give evidence that they were similarly victimised by Cosby in the 1980s. Prosecutors called them as witnesses to establish what they said was a pattern of criminal behaviour.

Cosby’s lawyers argued on appeal that the use of the five additional accusers was improper.

The Pennsylvania high court did not weigh in on the question, saying it was moot given its finding that Cosby should not have been prosecuted in the first place.

In May, Cosby was denied parole after refusing to participate in sex offender programmes behind bars. He has long said he would resist the treatment programmes and refuse to acknowledge wrongdoing even if it meant serving the full 10-year sentence.

Prosecutors said Cosby repeatedly used his fame and “family man” persona to manipulate young women, holding himself out as a mentor before betraying them.

In the deposition that spelled his downfall, the comedian said under oath that he used to offer tranquillisers to women he wanted to have sex with. He eventually settled with  Constand for 3.4 million dollars (£2.4 million).

*The initial version of this article was a breaking news post when the news first emerged from Pennsylvania at 6.15pm on 30 June but regrettably was not updated in the following hours. The piece was updated on 1 July to provide more context and reporting around the court’s decision.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 42 comments
Close
42 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Micheal D. Lynch
    Favourite Micheal D. Lynch
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 12:22 PM

    My gun safe is under my bed. If an intruder was in my house I’d pull the trigger first and ask questions after. He has absolutely no business there only to rob or do my family harm.

    74
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cormac Flanagan
    Favourite Cormac Flanagan
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 12:26 PM

    As the saying goes it’s better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

    74
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Dennehy
    Favourite Mark Dennehy
    Report
    Sep 12th 2011, 2:33 AM

    Your CPO signed off on having your gun safe under your bed instead of attached to a structural wall as required by law?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Liam Byrne
    Favourite Liam Byrne
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 12:01 PM

    I think confronting such a scumbag would depend more on how many of them there were than simple courage.

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute shane mc fadden
    Favourite shane mc fadden
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 1:03 PM

    The only reason cavan people are the most likely to stop inturders is because they are to scabby to lose anything

    42
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Daly
    Favourite Brian Daly
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 12:03 PM

    "not to become complacent"?

    It’s my home not a prison, I am not going to live my life in fear of something that has very little chance of ever happening.

    Besides, I would mangle anyone who tried it :)

    37
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute jumpthecat
    Favourite jumpthecat
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 12:20 PM

    You haven’t got enough "stuff"…

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Randy savage
    Favourite Randy savage
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 2:20 PM

    Thank god my gun safe is in my room, i keep it loaded and the door locked so as to give me time to get it and point at the door. Anyone that enters my home illegally is leaving in a bodybag regardless of whether their armed or not. No apologies to lefts will be made.

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lousie Burke
    Favourite Lousie Burke
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 2:31 PM

    Got my gun under my bed ready in case of burglars, too right, I’d protect myself and family, shoot to kill I would

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Doherty
    Favourite Brian Doherty
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 2:01 PM

    A lot of break ins in my area in the last few months. all of them in the morning when people are at work and houses are empty. most of these scumbags are looking for a nice handy rob. the best deterrent is a good savage dog.

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Guinness Follower
    Favourite Guinness Follower
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 3:07 PM

    I’m not married.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Itchy Brain
    Favourite Itchy Brain
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 3:58 PM

    All I have is pepper.

    Option A
    Restained a burglar and call the guards.
    For starters I would probably have to wait for about an hour or more for them to come. The guards finally arrive, take him to the station, maybe accuse me of assault. Let him out within a day informing him he will recieve a summons.
    Meanwhile hes angry and wants to get revenge. Maybe come back and harm my family when I’m not there.

    Option B
    Restain him, Kill him

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Thomas
    Favourite John Thomas
    Report
    Sep 12th 2011, 12:08 AM

    Had he cleaned the stain before you restained him, before killing him? :)

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Mack
    Favourite John Mack
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 12:44 PM

    the worse thing about these polls is that they show scumbags there is a 10% chance of being injured if they rob houses in Clare, Dublin or kildare. must encourage my neighbors to answer that question with yeah I’d kill them if they even step on to my land… and beat them up if they throw papers in the street.:) if they know there is a good chance of not getting caught or not getting killed then the odds are in their favor.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jim Daly
    Favourite Jim Daly
    Report
    Sep 11th 2011, 1:33 PM

    Do they say how many of the respondents were scumbags? That could skew the results.

    8
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds