Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

TV presenter hurt during UK science programme awarded £1.6m damages

Jeremy Stansfield was injured while carrying out ‘crash tests’ in a specially designed ‘rig’ during the BBC programme Bang Goes The Theory.

A television presenter hurt while playing the role of a “crash test dummy” during a UK science programme has been awarded £1.6 million in damages after a High Court fight with the BBC.

Justice Yip heard how Jeremy Stansfield was injured while carrying out “crash tests” in a specially designed “rig” during the BBC programme Bang Goes The Theory in February 2013.

Stansfield said he suffered spine and brain injuries and lost more than £3 million in potential future earnings.

The BBC disputed Stansfield’s damages claim.

Justice Yip oversaw a trial at the High Court in London earlier this year and delivered a ruling on Friday.

“I have found that the claimant was caused injury to his brain, spine and audio-vestibular system in the crash tests,” she said in her ruling.

“While none of the physical injuries were particularly severe, the combined effect together with a psychiatric reaction have caused a constellation of symptoms and problems which have produced a significant impairment in the claimant’s functioning.

The effect has been to derail the claimant’s successful career in television as well as to restrict his enjoyment of life more generally.

“There is strong evidence that prior to the crash tests he was an exceptionally fit man.”

She said there would be judgment for Stansfield in the sum of £1,617,286.20.

Justice Yip said the parties had agreed that Stansfield should recover “two-thirds of the damages assessed as being caused by injuries he sustained when carrying out the crash tests”.

She said Stansfield was now 50, and was 42 at the time of the crash tests.

“There is strong evidence that prior to the crash tests he was an exceptionally fit man,” she said.

“Video footage from the time shows that he was slim but with strong musculature. There are clips of him balancing and walking on his hands and scaling a building using vacuum gloves he created.”

“In 2012, the BBC required him to undergo a physical assessment before undertaking a project involving a human powered aircraft, which he had designed.”

“The results suggested he was performing at the level of a competitive athlete.”

Justice Yip said Stansfield, who is known as “Jem”, was a presenter on the “popular” Bang Goes The Theory show.

She said he was an engineer by background.

“This claim arises out of the making of an episode of Bang Goes The Theory in which the claimant assumed the role of a human ‘crash test dummy’ for a feature about the relative safety of forward and rearward-facing child car seats.”

“During filming on 8 February 2013, the claimant conducted a series of crash tests. He was strapped into a rig like a go-cart which was propelled along a track into a post.”

“In the introduction to the piece, the claimant explains that he had calculated the experiment to give a similar crash profile to hitting a lamppost in a real car in an urban environment.”

“The crashes were performed forwards and backwards twice each. It is not in dispute, and perhaps not surprising, that the claimant suffered some injury. What is contentious is the extent of that injury and the consequences for the claimant.”

Stansfield said he had been left with a constellation of symptoms which had produced a significant decline in his health.

Justice Yip said the BBC contended that “little more than a moderate whiplash injury with depressive symptoms could properly be attributed to the crash tests, such as would give rise to only modest damages”.

Close
6 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Barrycelona
    Favourite Barrycelona
    Report
    Oct 1st 2021, 12:06 PM

    What is the world coming to?? . You are asked to drive into an an obstacle at speed, several times and instead of saying NO and ignoring all health and safety regulations, you are awarded £1.6m in compensation. Physical fitness obviously needs a brain to guide you. Hammond out of Top Gear must be worth billions

    191
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Bunny Johnson
    Favourite Bunny Johnson
    Report
    Oct 1st 2021, 1:42 PM

    @Barrycelona: Not only that but he says in the article he designed it to match the impact of hitting a post. How could anyone be liable but himself. Madness.

    92
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fiona Fitzgerald
    Favourite Fiona Fitzgerald
    Report
    Oct 1st 2021, 6:04 PM

    @Barrycelona: I think that’s a bit harsh if he’s already struggling. Some people bounce back from an accident and some people never fully get over it, or take longer. I’d say most of us would be restless and eager to get back to doing something we enjoy as soon as we start to feel better. He’s obviously not at that stage of recovery. If he was very fit & active beforehand, sure ask any sportsperson how lowering it is to be injured and unable to train.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul
    Favourite Paul
    Report
    Oct 1st 2021, 1:48 PM

    Crash for cash

    51
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Aidan Conway
    Favourite Aidan Conway
    Report
    Oct 1st 2021, 4:37 PM

    Sad really we need people to do these tyoes of programmes they are educational…

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute B Collins
    Favourite B Collins
    Report
    Oct 5th 2021, 4:42 AM

    So this man, an engineer, designs a crash experiment and assumes the role of crash dummy. He crashes forward twice, then backwards twice.

    And now he has sued the workplace for his injuries.

    Okay. I’m not really sure what to make of this utter madness.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds