Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE MINISTER FOR Defence has defended his department’s handling of the offer of two heavy lift aircraft and insisted he wasn’t aware of the full details of the proposal received by his officials.
An investigation by The Journal discovered evidence that Simon Coveney’s Defence department was aware of the offer a full eight months before the Army’s elite Ranger Wing were sent to Kabul in August to spearhead an operation to rescue stranded Irish citizens.
The Department of Defence refused efforts to provide two long-range second-hand heavy lift aircraft for the Irish Air Corps months before that operation was launched, our article published on Monday revealed. The purchase-or-lease offer was made by the Seraph Aviation Group.
The Ranger Wing’s flights to and from the war-torn country were on board French and Finnish aircraft as the Irish Air Corps did not have a long-range aircraft suitable for the mission.
Speaking on Prime Time in August after it was confirmed that the successful mission had resulted in the rescue of dozens of Irish citizens and residents Coveney said he was not aware of any offer of a second-hand plane. The minister had just steppped out of a reception to take part in the impromptu interview and appeared to be taken by surpise by the question on the issue.
He was asked about the offer of two heavy lift aircraft and responded that he was not aware of it – however documents obtained by The Journal show that the company making the offer contacted him on his Oireachtas email and on the Department of Defence ministerial email account.
While attending a conference of the Defence Forces officers representative body (Raco) this week, the minister was asked about the offer by The Journal:
“I certainly wasn’t aware of the details of it,” he said.
“I’m aware that we get offers all the time and the department deals with them as they should as professional civil servants.
“Just because an offer comes in, and a few months later, it looks like we could have used that type of equipment doesn’t mean that we should necessarily take it each time.”
Coveney said that the Department was engaged in a multi-million euro purchase of aircraft for the Air Corps.
He said that the offer of the two strategic heavy lift aircraft did not follow the normal tendering process – although documents show that the Seraph Aviation Group executive had offered to enter the normal manner procurement protocol.
The documents revealed that Seraph had offered the two aircraft on a lease or buy outright basis. They also offered to meet officials and to enter the tendering process if required.
“This isn’t how you do equipment purchase. We get offers all the time for people [who] want to do business with the Department of Defence in terms of equipment or whatever.
“I mean, we have a procurement process, we have legal obligations in terms of procurement, we have a capital expenditure programme that is multi-annual, we are spending a fortune on aircraft as we speak.
Referring to recent purchases of single-engine and maritime patrol aircraft, he continued:
We have spent a lot of money on on PC-12s, four of them, we’ve committed over €200 million to two new CASAs, which will be arriving in the next two years. So we’re spending a lot of money on aviation aircraft.
Coveney said that the issue of strategic heavy lift aircraft, to facilitate movements of large numbers of troops and cargo, was being considered in the ongoing Commission on the Defence Forces.
He said that the Kabul operation had shown the need for such a resource.
Following repeated reports and commentary from former members of the Defence Forces the Government decided to set up the independent commission. Its terms of reference have enabled it to examine pay, conditions and resourcing across the Defence Forces.
Seraph Aviation Group said that they would be willing to talk directly to the Department in regard to the provision of aircraft.
“We concur with the comments of the Minister, as we fully recognise the need for a procurement process.
“We would be happy to engage in one, should the opportunity arise, as this would enable us to demonstrate the benefits and value of our proposal. In that context, we note that the two C295 aircraft remain available to the State,” the spokesperson said.
Criticism
Cathal Berry TD, a former senior officer in the Army Ranger Wing, has said that questions must be asked about the funding model for the Defence Forces.
He was speaking after the Raco conference, held in Kildare this week, and said that he and all delegates were not impressed with Simon Coveney’s address.
Coveney said in his speech that the commission would examine the vulnerabilities across the Defence Forces and link it back to the needs of Government.
Berry said: “My reaction to the Minister’s attendance at Raco is that it was very disappointing, the audience were very disappointed. It was a great opportunity to announce tangible solutions to address the retention crisis but the Minister did not do that.
“Secondly, the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was blamed a lot by the Minister.
“Simon Coveney is the Minister for Foreign Affairs and is the Minister for Defence also.
“Foreign Affairs is getting significant investment and resources but Defence is not getting the same. There is a lot of expenditure for Foreign Affairs – new embassies opened, big increase in budgets while Defence is closing down barracks, morale is the lowest ever in living memory and the budget is in freefall.
“Line ministers, like Minister Coveney, should take responsibility.”
Security Council
Ireland is currently has a seat of the UN Security Council – the former Army Officer said that the current lack of funding in Defence is adversely affecting Ireland’s international reputation.
“Other members of the Council view Ireland as negligent and as free loaders. They will say how dare we use American and European tax money to provide for our security.
“They believe we are not pulling our weight, we are abdicating our defence and using other people’s money to do it they take a very dim view.
“We are not playing our part – their view is that at the very least we need to be able to look after our own defence and security – it really undermines our international reputation,” he added.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Poor girl. If this is true the sentence will be minimal…to add to her distress.
Worrying trend of assaults lately. And punishments are silly.
I hope she will be ok.
Totally unrelated to this story,but how come on Facebook the journal post the story of the chap stabbed to death & anyone can comment on it but nobody can comment here.
Regardless of the fact Facebook may have different rules.The main reason i see comments not allowed on the journal is for legal reasons,then why bother to post them on Facebook if it has legal ramifications ? surely the eyes of the law don’t care if its the comment section on the journal or Facebook.
Young as 10 are allowed out of the premises unsupervised. Toilets are unsupervised where a lot off the action takes place. OK I could go on. But my heart goes out to that poor girl and her family. They will get the toerags who have done but that won’t alleviate the pain for this young girl
@Warthog: How do I know this? Firstly I have a 12 yr old daughter. Secondly i have direct information from othet students, guards and bouncers. Parents are failing on their duty og care by letting their children go to these money grabbing very poorly supervised events. People should be arrested. We have a youth club underage disco where we have parents montitoring everything. Parents have to collect their children. While at the disco they are not allowed out the door unless a parent is their to collect them or they are with one of the supervising parents.
@Warthog: Messed up on the word count and lost first part of my first message… Young as 10…
Was saying before that is that these underage discos are “sex events “. Alcohol, some drugs are taken before the discos. Girls go commando. Slut runs of different varieties are normal as is the swooping of different bodily fluids. The supervision is non existent. These events need to be stopped or come under a whole new set of “care” rules. All these places want Is cash as they dont give a damn aboutvthe kids.
@Warthog: WTF is a “slut run?”
@Warthog: Ah yes I remember being 10 years old during summer time: video games, bit of soccer, riding our BMXs round the neighbourhood, and when we were too tuckered out from all that we’d snort a few lines bought with saved up pocket-money and get in the finger-bang queue down the local sex event
Sure a bit of hyperbole never hurt anyone
@Warthog: ya a friend of mine does security, and it’s truly shocking what goes on at these events. They can’t control them. And these are seasoned security personnel.
@Warthog: surely you are thinking of an older age group?? I find your comments a bit disturbing. I run a disco for 10 to 12 year olds. NONE of that happens. Where are you talking about?
Slut runs??? Wtf? Disgusting turn of phrase.
Its being reported as a gang-rape in other media. but not here.
have your say