We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
THE NUMBER OF animals used in testing in Ireland has halved since a European Union directive came into effect in 2013, according to new figures.
Animal rights activists have said the number of animals used in testing is still too high, with almost 138,000 animals used last year.
The 2013 EU directive, which aimed to enhance animal welfare and ensure animals are used in studies only when their use is necessary, introduced stricter regulation.
Scientific procedures involving animals can only take place following a detailed submission of the planned study/studies and subsequent approval by the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) on the basis of a favourable harm/benefit analysis.
There are also a number of reporting requirements such as the use of each animal and the severity experienced by the animal.
In 2020, there were a total of 137,988 uses of animals in procedures for research and testing purposes. This is down slightly from the 2019 figure of 138,439 and represents a significant reduction from the 277,559 animals used in 2013, the year the EU directive was first implemented.
Mice were the most commonly used species last year at 82% of the total animal use.
In addition, 702 mice were reported as having been used to create and maintain colonies of genetically altered animals. These 702 mice are not considered by the European Commission to have been directly used in research and testing.
The next most commonly used species was rats, followed by fish. Guinea pigs were used 228 times, dogs were used 24 times and horses, donkeys and cross-breeds were used 238 times.
The animals reported as being used under the category ‘other rodents’ were red squirrels being studied as part of a conservation project aiming to protect their population numbers and habitats.
Of the total number of uses of animals in procedures for research and testing purposes, 75% were used for regulatory purposes, which refers to legal requirements to test the safety, quality and potency of medicines (eg biological medicines such as vaccines).
This testing is required for producing, placing and maintaining products or substances on the market.
‘Basic research’ refers to studies of a fundamental nature, which are designed to add knowledge about the structure, functioning or behaviour of organisms.
The most common sub-field of ‘Basic research’ at 31% was ‘immune system’, which relates to research investigating the functioning and activities of the immune system in health and disease.
The most frequently reported actual severity experienced by animals during their uses in procedures for research and testing purposes was mild at 58%, followed by moderate at 26%. In 21,209 cases the classification was ‘severe’.
Commenting on the latest figures, John Carmody of Animal Rights Action Network (ARAN) called for a review of experiments carried out on animals and an examination of the HPRA’s ‘replacement, reduction, refinement’ aim under the EU legislation.
“The public are going to be disgusted, shocked and sickened with news that dogs, horses and other animals are still being used in experiments in this day and age when we are at a time of wonderful advancement that progresses medical progress with no animal use as opposed to these latest figures essentially showing a catalogue of animals of all species still used in experiments and treated as test objects as opposed to sentient beings who are clearly capable of experiencing pain and suffering,” he said.
“Mice and rats are abused in everything from toxicology tests – in which they are slowly poisoned to death – to painful burn experiments to psychological experiments that induce terror, anxiety, depression, and helplessness.”
The HPRA in its report said its focus will continue to be on “promoting the replacement of tests using animals with suitable non-animal alternative tests, ensuring that the principle of reduction is applied appropriately when animals are used in procedures, and refining both the care and use of animals in procedures”.
The HPRA said it will ensure that animals are used only when there is no equivalent alternative (non-animal) technique available, and the harm-benefit analysis of the proposed use is favourable.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
If you want an objective case for why animal testing is bad science, then I suggest you check out the Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine in America. You can’t use different species, with differences in DNA and physiology to adequately trial human medicine. Computer based simulation is superior and more ethical. One of the main reasons for animal testing is securing and retaining research funds. http://www.pcrm.org.
Didn’t think this kind of thing still went on. It would be really interesting to see listed what organisations are doing this and why. Particularly when you see dogs listed…..
@Peter B: I agree, but why just when you see dogs mentioned? I have pet rats and rats are so soulful, sensitive, emotional, loving family orientated and super intelligent! I don’t understand why animal testing still needs to be done, other than testing medications meant for that particular species where you need placebo versus real med comparison, plus how well it helps the animal it’s aimed at, the toxicity, therapeutic dosage etc.
In essence, only do trials on species something is meant for. So if it’s for humans, get human volunteers. There is always plenty of volunteers willing to take part in trials.
Get my drift.
So yes, there is a small need for animal testing, but only to help improve or come up with new and better meds for animals of their own species.
Maybe we could do the testing on the “ activists “ – I’m sure they would be queuing up to volunteer .
In other news, testing on humans has gone up to 90% of the adult population
@David O’Rourke: Oh I see what you did there
Before medicines can proceed to clinical trials in humans the vast majority of them first have to be tested in animals (pre-clinical studies). So for anyone on their high horse (pun intended) saying no animal testing should be conducted, they should think twice the next time they take an over-the-counter medicine or fill a prescription.
Does anyone have recommendations for male and female products not tested on animals on the shelves in Ireland?
@Niall Mullane: Simple skincare don’t test, that’s just off the top of my head – but any products that don’t test will have a vegan/animal cruelty label. Think it’s a bunny
@Sam Kendlin Hobbs: thank you
Animal testing is not only incredibly cruel, it’s also an unreliable and outdated research method. Over 90% of drugs that are effective in animal testing fail in human clinical trials.
‘Severe’ experiments on live animals increased in Ireland have actually increased year on year since 2017, has also been stated in the journal before to the best of my knowledge.
It’s really about time the Irish government ended its utterly unacceptable severe animal cruelty and devised a strategy to honour its legal and moral duties to reduce animal suffering in Irish laboratories, as the Irish Anti-Vivisection Society (IAVS) has states before. Thus Ireland should aim to phase-out animal testing all together as soon as possible. The Irish Govt should be transparent and provide a clear timeline for this.
Recently the European Parliament just voted in favor of developing an action plan to end experiments on animals. Members of the European Parliament (MEP) supported a motion for a resolution to accelerate the transition to scientific innovation without the use of animals in research, regulatory testing, and education.
Hoping the the Irish govt follow suits of this, and hope it doesn’t wait until this action plan comes into force?
Kind paw regards, Gerben Uunk, co-founder Party for Animal Welfare (PAW). A registered political party in Ireland since February 2020. Several of our sister animal advocacy party’s across the world have MP’s.
have your say