Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
BORIS JOHNSON HAS denied lying to the British parliament about a gathering in No 10’s garden during the first lockdown, despite his former chief adviser Dominic Cummings saying he would swear on oath that he warned the British Prime Minister it would be a rule-breaking drinks party.
In a major interview today, Johnson said he had told the Whitehall inquiry into the allegations that to the “best of my recollection” ahead of the 20 May 2020 event “nobody told me that what we were doing was against the rules”.
The Prime Minister said that he does “humbly apologise to people for misjudgments that were made” as he faces calls to resign over the partygate affair, including from six Tory MPs.
He made his first public appearance after reducing his contacts from when No 10 said a family member tested positive for Covid-19 last week, as Chancellor Rishi Sunak refused to give the Prime Minister his unequivocal backing.
Asked if he had lied to Parliament over the parties during a visit to a north London hospital, Johnson said: “No. I want to begin by repeating my apologies to everybody for the misjudgments that I’ve made, that we may have made in No 10 and beyond, whether in Downing Street or throughout the pandemic.
“Nobody told me that what we were doing was against the rules, that the event in question was something that … was not a work event, and as I said in the House of Commons when I went out into that garden I thought that I was attending a work event.”
Johnson said he “could not imagine why on earth it would have gone ahead, or why it would’ve been allowed to go ahead” if he had been told it was not a “work event”.
“I do humbly apologise to people for misjudgments that were made but that is the very, very best of my recollection about this event, that’s what I’ve said to the inquiry,” he said.
“I carry full responsibility for what took place but nobody told me, I’m absolutely categorical, nobody said to me this is an event that is against the rules.”
He insisted he only saw the “bring your own booze” invite that his principal private secretary Martin Reynolds sent to more than 100 staff “the other day… when it emerged”.
“Nobody warned me that it was against the rules, I am absolutely categorical, because I would remember that,” he added.
Johnson also publicly apologised to Queen Elizabeth over two staff parties that were held in Downing Street the night before Prince Philip’s funeral, saying: “I deeply and bitterly regret that that happened.”
“I can only renew my apologies both to Her Majesty and to the country for misjudgments that were made, and for which I take full responsibility,” he added.
He declined to say whether he would resign if it emerged he did intentionally mislead parliament, instead pleading for patience ahead of senior civil servant Sue Gray delivering her verdict.
Dominic Raab
It comes after Dominic Raab said this morning that Johnson would “normally” be expected to resign if he intentionally misled the British parliament.
Raab insisted today that the allegation from Cummings that the Prime Minister lied to the Commons is “nonsense”.
Cummings said he is willing to “swear under oath” that Johnson had lied when claiming he did not know in advance that the 20 May 2020 event would be a “drinks party”.
In the Commons last week, the Prime Minister admitted spending 25 minutes at the gathering but insisted he had believed “implicitly” that it would be a work event.
Raab told Times Radio: “The suggestion that he lied is nonsense. He’s made it very clear to the House of Commons that questions on this… that he thought it was a work event.”
But the Cabinet minister was pressed on what would be expected if Johnson had lied to the Commons.
“If it’s lying, deliberate in the way you describe, if it’s not corrected immediately, it would normally under the ministerial code and the governance around Parliament be a resigning matter,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
👀@DominicRaab: There was speculation 20 May party was held in my honour...
— Kay Burley (@KayBurley) January 18, 2022
Kay: Was it?@DominicRaab: No, of course not...
Kay: So there was a party on 20 May then?#KayBurley #partygate UF pic.twitter.com/ogf73nrcbC
Yesterday, Cummings said he and another senior official warned the Prime Minister’s principal private secretary, Martin Reynolds, that his invitation to around 100 staff was against coronavirus rules.
“I said to the PM something like: ‘Martin’s invited the building to a drinks party, this is what I’m talking about, you’ve got to grip this madhouse’. The PM waved it aside,” Cummings wrote on his blog.
“The events of May 20 alone, never mind the string of other events, mean the PM lied to Parliament about parties.
“Not only me but other eyewitnesses who discussed this at the time would swear under oath this is what happened.”
A No 10 spokesman insisted Johnson had apologised to the House and that he “believed implicitly” that he had been attending a work event.
“It is untrue that the Prime Minister was warned about the event in advance,” the spokesman said, adding that Johnson would be making a further statement when senior civil servant Sue Gray has completed her inquiry into party allegations.
Updated blog: PM was told about the invite, he knew it was a drinks party, he lied to Parliament https://t.co/J3jslbQV9A pic.twitter.com/UKCxKMM80k
— Dominic Cummings (@Dominic2306) January 17, 2022
The latest salvo from Cummings, who left Downing Street in November 2020, is adding to the pressure on Johnson as he faces public calls to resign from six Tory MPs and widespread anger over claims that No 10 staff broke the Covid rules they imposed.
Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner said Mr Johnson does not need to wait for Ms Gray’s report and called on him to step down now.
“Instead of hiding behind internal inquiries or technicalities, we need the Prime Minister to tell the truth, pure and simple,” she said. “He must resign.”
After allegations of a Christmas party during restrictions in 2020 first emerged, Mr Johnson told the Commons he had been “repeatedly assured since these allegations emerged that there was no party and that no Covid rules were broken”.
But after an email surfaced of Mr Reynolds inviting colleagues to the May 20 2020 event, the Prime Minister admitted in the Commons last week that he attended to “thank groups of staff”.
“I believed implicitly that this was a work event,” he said, before conceding he “should have sent everyone back inside” but claiming it may “technically” have fallen within the rules.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Genuine question, not trolling or stirring…….what sectors still aren’t open that sees/warrants almost 100,000 people still being on the PUP? There’s a massive labour shortage in the country and there seems to be a percentage of people benefiting financially from staying on the PUP as opposed to going back to work. That includes foreign nationals who went back to their birth country and are in receipt of the payment (matter of fact, not speculation).
@Barry Evans: they should make everyone on it turn in person next week to collect it. Then they will know how many in the country or not.
@Barry Evans: The ELE sector was permitted to resume activity last month however it’s going to take time to rebuild it. Students aren’t just going to start coming here again overnight and until there is enough to facilitate more classes there will still be a lot of teachers out of work. Speaking for myself I am not benefiting financially from staying on the PUP as opposed to going back to work and will be only too happy to return to my post when it becomes available.
@Barry Evans:
There may be a shortage of people who want to give their labour for cheap, or for free.
But there’s not a labour shortage.
@Dean: I can assure you that there’s a labour shortage and its not for jobs paying thrupence haypenny. Look at the construction sector and there are massive shortages of labour across the board. Your comment is a throw away one based on nothing
@Barry Evans:
Shortage of supply = value increases. So we were taught.
Shortage of houses and prices go up. But a “shortage” of labour and employers won’t offer the asking price; they just complain that there’s no one to work (for their low wages which don’t get people above water).
@Dean: What are you talking about, it doesn’t look like you’ve worked in a while or your possible unskilled. Over the past 12 months an acute labour shortage has occurred within many sectors. Rates of pay have increased to attract suitability skilled workers to fill these positions.
@Barry Evans: Nightclubs & music venues still closed off the top of my head but a lot of people have left the country and many don’t want to work nights anymore and have moved into 9-5 jobs. Lack of language students most of whom would work 20 p/w in hospitality jobs and chronic housing issues doesn’t help either
@Mary Finn: They got 20,000 to do that this week
@Dean: employers won’t offer the asking price??? Are you having a giraffe? Labourers are being offered 18 quid an hour on sites and they still can’t get people. Hardly minimum wage! There’s a whole cohort in this country who don’t want to work or have grossly over valued themselves. Sounds like you’re definitely falling into the second bracket. I accept that there are some sectors like nightclubs and entertainment who are still stood down or dusting themselves down and starting again but it doesn’t get away from the fact that there’s a shortage of people willing to work. With regard to shortage of supply = increased value, a lot of companies are locked into fixed overheads, fixed price contracts etc from before this sh 1 t storm but sure go right ahead and only see one perspective!
@Barry Evans: The event industry is not yet re opened. No events at RDS for example. Husbands boss said business will resume in 2022 eventually. PUP is needed or otherwise drop a lifelong carrier. I get it you are not happy with people on PUP, Ireland is the slowest country in EU to re open events…
@Pupi_51%: it’s not that I’m unhappy with people being on the PUP. If people from a particular sector for which they’re qualified, such as the one you mentioned, still can’t work then I have no issue whatsoever with them being in receipt of the payment. Once it can be verified in writing by their employer that the sector/organisation still isn’t operating or generating revenue. I dont however believe that’s the case in almost 100,000 recipients of the payment as per the article. If you can be working you should be working, simple as that!
@Barry Evans:
Nightclubs
Live Venues
Airline Travel is long way off normal (this is big)
Some Public Transport (Nightlink)
That is just a start… But the economy is not back on speed and there is places that it might never come back (due to us changing habits)
Slated for saying it a month ago and likely to be again now but when is enough enough. There are so many jobs out there. Sure people don’t want to do them, sure they don’t all pay well but it’s nearly 2 years since covid hit…. Can’t possibly be absolutely no other option for alot of the 100k.
Thats on paper only, paper and reality are very different. If you know you know.
@To Mt: very mysterious comment. Guessing the department moved away from paper a long time ago ;)
@To Mt: how can they not know how many people are on PUP? How do you know more? Be less mysterious and more specific.
The department should send our questionnaires to see if people are still entitled to it.
@Chris Gaffney: they did
have your say