We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
FINDING A CONSENSUS proved difficult as European Union foreign ministers held discussions on a sixth round of sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine today.
“Nothing is off the table, including sanctions on oil and gas,” Josep Borrell, the EU’s top diplomat, told reporters after the meeting. “But today, no decision was taken.”
At the same time, he pointed to an anticipated massive Russian assault on Ukraine’s southeastern Donbas region, and said the main focus now needed to be on providing more military aid to Kyiv.
“Let’s have no illusions. If you cut gas today, it’s not going to stop the Russian army from waging war in the next couple of weeks,” he said.
The EU ministers approved adding another €500 million to the €1 billion it has already approved for financing and delivering weapons to the Ukrainian government, although the decision still needed to be ratified by the parliaments of a couple of member states.
Borrell meanwhile warned that the bloc also needed to bolster its defences in another kind of battle: “A battle of narrative.”
Russia, he said, was trying to blame a growing global food crisis on the international sanctions slapped on it, whereas the blame lay with Moscow, which Borrell accused of “sowing bombs on Ukraine’s fields, (while) Russian warships have blockaded tens of ships full of wheat”.
Russia ‘causing food scarcity’
“Stop blaming the sanctions,” he said. “It is the Russian military that is causing food scarcity.”
Five rounds of sanctions have already been implemented since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24 February, and Borrell said foreign ministers had discussed today “how to implement the sanctions to avoid any kind of loopholes,” as well as “what else can be done”.
The European Union is now committed to what European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen says are “rolling sanctions” on Russia. But it has so far held back from those which would hit Moscow’s coffers the hardest: a boycott of Russian oil and gas exports.
The fifth round of sanctions includes a ban on Russian coal imports into the EU – an important first step towards what could become a broader prohibition on energy supplies.
Many ministers at today’s meeting backed further energy sanctions, but they also stressed the importance of maintaining EU consensus and unity.
Speaking as he arrived for the meeting, Foreign Minister Simon Coveney acknowledged that banning Russian oil was “very difficult for some member states”.
“Ireland has maintained for quite some time that we need to take a maximalist approach to sanctions to offer the strongest deterrent to the continuation of this war and brutality,” Coveney said.
“That should include, in our view, oil.
“We know that is very difficult for some member states and we have to keep a united position across the EU.
“We now have coal as part of the sanctions package. We know that the commission is working on a future package that we hope we can see soon that will involve oil as well.
“The European Union is spending hundreds of millions of euros importing oil from Russia. That is certainly contributing to financing this war.
“In our view we need to cut off that financing of war even though it creates huge challenges and problems for the EU to solve together.
“We will see what the commission says. They are now working on ensuring that oil is part of the next sanctions package. We believe the sooner that can happen the better,” Coveney added.
One obstacle to widening energy sanctions is Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, an EU leader close with the Russian president who won re-election to a fourth term a week ago.
Orban has refused to take them further. Yet EU sanctions require unanimity from all 27 member states.
Hungary and Bulgaria had meanwhile not blocked the move to release further funds to provide more weapons to Ukraine, as some had feared.
“They will pay their share of the 1.5 billion,” Borrell said.
‘Inadequate’
The dependence on Russian hydrocarbons of Germany, Austria, Bulgaria, Italy and some other EU countries has also made it difficult to find consensus on tightening sanctions further.
“But there are no flat ‘No’s', like there were in the beginning,” Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde said after the meeting, acknowledging though that “this is not going to be a swift decision”.
Polish Foreign Minister Zbigniew Rau complained that the EU was acting too slowly.
“We should have already introduced this embargo a long time ago,” he said. “At the moment, the sanctions are inadequate.”
Additional reporting from Press Association
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Just do it ffs, he’s wiping a nationality of the face of the earth. I’m sure we can suffer higher prices for a while compared to what the Ukranians are going through. He needs to have his source of funding for this massacre cut off
@Declan Moran: how many Ukrainians have you taken into your house?
@John Moloney: as smart as you are I have made an offer. How about yourself ?
@Declan Moran: don’t feed the troll Declan
Disappointed with Germany, they’re essentially funding the Russian military by continuing to buy their oil and gas in such quantities.
Other sanctions are pointless if Europe isn’t willing to hit their main export.
We get it Roy…keeping things going as normal is more important than dead civilians
@Roy Dowling: your not addressing the point….you seem to put the health of the western economy and keeping everything as normal above dead Ukrainian civilians…it’s a point of view your entitled to. Just Own it
@David cotter: I do yes. I don’t believe the whole world need to suffer and lives need to be lost in other countries because of one war. And you were happy to keep Western economy and Keeping everything normal above dead Iraqi civilians. It was your point of view and you were entitled to it so own it as well won’t you?
@David cotter: Roy Dowling has a point. There are many aspect to this and he does point out hospitals, food and priority sectors. I’m sure there is also political angles to this (the French election for one). No one is saying that Ukrainian or Iraqi lives do not matter. But the other side of this has to be thought of as well, including Europe’s ability to aid Ukraine and re-build it (hopefully once Putin has been defeated, or he is forced into a position where his options are limited). You don’t help your neighbour by inflicting too much damage on yourself. And I am not claiming that discussions on sanctions are only caused by the highest motives possible.
@David cotter: as smart as you are, i have made an offer
I agree with stopping the oil and gas but China will just take up the slack and the EU loses the gas and oil but Putin just gets another taker for it…
How can sanctions be taken seriously when it’s only on things that we can do without. How about cutting Russia off and working around the situation
Europe is mostly as one when it comes to the Ukraine crisis so they should find common cause.
The EU and Ireland are good at making the right political noises about Ukraine but not on follow through. The focus on trade sanctions now is on oil and gas, however practical financial sanctions have not been fully implemented. The financial services consultants lawyers and other handmaidens to the Russian money laundering class must be happy that the focus has moved from their own cash cow.
Practical financial sanctions in Ireland mean reforming the 1907 Irish Limited Partnership Act which is being extensively used by Russian oligarchs and their financial nominees to get around the financial sanctions supposedly cutting off money used for the Russia’s attempted genocide in Ukraine.
Irish bankers and lawyers are profiting mightily right now by supplying the financial and administrative means for Russian money launderers to work here. This has was all exposed in the Panama Papers 3 years ago, soon after which our duplicitous politicians were shamed into setting up “a committee to study the issue” which ( no doubt due only to the rumoured world shortage of ink !!!!) has yet to make a report. Financial profits or Ukrainian lives, FFG’s choice so far is to protect the income streams for some of it’s most wealthy backers.
have your say