Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
LAST UPDATE | 27 Apr 2022
POLAND AND BULGARIA are now receiving gas from their EU neighbours after Russia cut off the flow of gas to the two member states yesterday.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen confirmed today that the two states would be provided with gas by other EU members to ensure that the decision by Russia to cut gas supplies would not impact on European customers.
“We will ensure that Gazprom’s decision has the least possible impact on European consumers,” von der Leyen said.
“Today, the Kremlin failed once again in its attempt to sow division among member states. The era of Russian fossil fuels in Europe is coming to an end.”
Von der Leyen warned EU importers that, unless a supply contract was denominated in roubles, giving in to the Kremlin’s demand and paying in roubles would contravene sanctions.
“This would be a breach of the sanctions, so a high risk for the companies,” she said.
She said that “about 97 percent” of all EU contracts explicitly stipulate payments in euros or dollars.
The top EU official said there were plans to convene a meeting of energy ministers from across the bloc “as soon as possible” to discuss the situation.
Yesterday, Gazprom announced that the supply of gas to Poland and Bulgaria was to be cut after both countries refused to pay for the fossil fuel in roubles following last month’s announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The energy giant said in a statement it notified Bulgaria’s Bulgargaz and Poland’s PGNiG about the “suspension of gas supplies from April 27 until payment is made” in roubles, after President Vladimir Putin last month said Russia will only accept payment for deliveries in its national currency.
Polish state-controlled gas utility company PGNiG has confirmed that Gazprom has “completely suspended” the supply of gas to Poland via the Yamal pipeline.
“Despite the fulfilment of all obligations under the Yamal contract by PGNiG, on April 27 this year, Gazprom has stopped delivering natural gas,” the Polish group said in a statement.
“The limitation of natural gas supplies is a breach of the Yamal contract. PGNiG reserves the right to pursue claims in connection with the suspension of deliveries and will use all contractual rights vested in the company and rights under the law.”
‘Unfriendly actions’
The Kremlin has said that the move to cease supplying gas to both Poland and Bulgaria was due to “unfriendly” actions against Russia by the two countries.
“The need for a new payment method was a result of unprecedented unfriendly steps in the economic sphere and the financial sector, which were taken against us by unfriendly countries,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters.
“This need was dictated by the fact that, as you know, they blocked from us — or, to put it plainly, stole — a fairly significant amount of our reserves,” Peskov said, adding that this led to a “transition to a new payment system”.
Russian ambassador to Ireland, Yuri Filatov said that Russia warned European countries multiple times that they needed to pay for gas in roubles.
“The only option to continue the gas supplies is to pay for these supplies in roubles,” said Filatov, speaking to RTÉ’s Drivetime.
“I don’t think that anybody would expect us to continue to supply gas for free under the circumstances.”
When asked whether or not Russia would cut off gas supplies to Germany, who have said that they would not pay for gas in roubles, Filatov said that he would not discuss “hypothetical situations”.
The Polish government has insisted it was ready to face any interruption of supply from Russia.
“There will be no shortage of gas in Polish homes,” Climate Minister Anna Moskwa wrote on Twitter.
“Since the first day of the war we have declared that we are ready for full independence from Russian raw materials,” she said.
“Poland has the necessary gas reserves and sources of supply to protect our security. For years we have been successfully making ourselves independent from Russia,” she added.
Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said gas storage facilities were 76% full and Poland was ready to “obtain gas from all possible other directions”.
Morawiecki called the halt of gas supplies a “direct attack” on Poland by Russia and that the country would deal with “this blackmail”.
“Russia not only carried out a brutal, murderous attack on Ukraine… but Russia also attacked all of Europe’s energy security and food security,” Morawiecki said.
“It is a direct attack on Poland… We’ll deal with this blackmail, this pistol to the head in such a way that it doesn’t affect Poles.”
He added that Poland may not need to rely on Russian gas starting in the autumn due to prior preparations.
‘Coordinated’ response
European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen has said the EU is planning a “coordinated” response after Gazprom’s announcement turned off the taps to Poland and Bulgaria.
Gazprom's announcement is another attempt by Russia to blackmail us with gas.
— Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) April 27, 2022
We are prepared for this scenario. We are mapping out our coordinated EU response.
Europeans can trust that we stand united and in solidarity with the Member States impacted.
“Gazprom’s announcement is another attempt by Russia to blackmail us with gas. We are prepared for this scenario. We are mapping out our coordinated EU response,” she said on Twitter.
“Europeans can trust that we stand united and in solidarity with the member states impacted.”
The announcement came as Ukraine announced that Russian forces had pushed deeper into the east of the country and captured several villages, as part of Moscow’s renewed offensive to take control of Donbas.
The defence ministry said that Russian forces had pushed out Kyiv’s army from Velyka Komyshuvakha and Zavody in the Kharkiv region and had gained control over Zarichne and Novotoshkivske in the Donetsk region.
This morning, Russia’s defence ministry said its forces had destroyed a large quantity of Western-supplied weapons in southeastern Ukraine with long-range missiles.
“On the territory of the Zaporizhzhia aluminium plant, high-precision long-range sea-based Kalibr missiles destroyed hangars with a large batch of foreign weapons and ammunition supplied by the United States and European countries for Ukrainian troops,” the ministry said in a briefing.
It did not say what type of weapons were destroyed.
Yesterday, on the invitation of the United States, 40 countries held a security summit in Germany to discuss arms supplies to Ukraine with Washington pledging to move “heaven and earth” to help the Kyiv army defeat Russia.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been pleading for heavier firepower to push back the Russian advance in the Donbas, but allies are wary of being drawn into a conflict that could spiral into an outright military confrontation between Moscow and NATO.
Explosions this week targeting the state security ministry, a radio tower and military unit in neighbouring Moldova’s region of Transnistria – occupied by Moscow’s forces for decades – followed a Kremlin commander’s claims Russian speakers in the country were being oppressed.
That triggered alarm that Moldova could be Russia’s next target in its push into Europe, with Moscow having exploited similar fears after launching its bloody invasion of Ukraine on 24 February.
“Russia wants to destabilise the Transnistrian region,” Mykhaylo Podolyak, a Ukraine presidential aide, wrote on Twitter.
“If Ukraine falls, tomorrow Russian troops will be at Chisinau’s gates,” he said, referring to Moldova’s capital.
The United States echoed similar concerns — though stopped short of backing Kyiv’s contention that Russia was responsible.
When asked about whether or not Russia intended on expanding the war into Moldova, Filatov denied that a war was taking place in Ukraine and that it was a “special military operation”.
“Russia is not carrying a war (sic), we are carrying special military operation in Ukraine and there are no plans to extend that,” said Filatov, speaking to RTÉ.
‘Heaven and earth’
Zelenskyy has been lobbying for heavier firepower to push back the Russian advance now focused on the eastern region of Donbas.
Western allies are wary of being drawn into an outright war with Russia, but Washington pledged at a summit to move “heaven and earth” to enable Ukraine to emerge victorious.
With arms flowing into Ukraine, Germany announced it would send anti-aircraft tanks – a sharp U-turn dropping its much-criticised cautious stance.
Britain will also urge Kyiv’s allies to “ramp up” military production including tanks and planes to help Ukraine, with Foreign Secretary Liz Truss set to call for a “new approach” to confront Putin.
“We must be prepared for the long haul and double down on our support for Ukraine,” she is set to say, according to pre-released remarks.
Truss will also urge Europe to cut off Russian energy imports “once and for all” – a move that would deprive Moscow of a key source of leverage over its dependent western neighbours.
On the brink
Fighting continues to rage across Ukraine’s east, Kyiv’s defence ministry said, with Russia shelling Kharkiv city and its troops launching an offensive on the town of Barvinkove.
In the south, two Russian missiles struck the industrial city of Zaporizhzhia, which has welcomed many civilians fleeing Mariupol, regional authorities said. Russian forces are expected to soon advance on the city, which is located near Ukraine’s largest nuclear power plant.
At the site of the world’s world-ever atomic disaster, Chernobyl in northern Ukraine observed the 36th anniversary of the meltdown back under Kyiv’s control.
To the east, at the entrance to Barvinkove, six Ukrainian soldiers were ready at any moment to dive into their trench, which they dig every day with a shovel.
“Otherwise, we’re dead,” said Vasyl, 51, who serves with his 22-year-old son Denys.
Ukraine officials said there was fighting all along the frontlines in the Donetsk region, and that resistance in the Azovstal factory in the besieged port city of Mariupol was still holding out.
The UN’s refugee agency said it now expects more than eight million Ukrainians to eventually flee their country, with nearly 5.3 million already out, and that $1.85 billion would be needed to host them in neighbouring countries.
In a meeting with Putin, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for Moscow and Kyiv to work together to set up aid and evacuation corridors in war-torn Ukraine.
He also called for an independent investigation into “possible war crimes” in Ukraine.
“I am concerned about the repeated reports of violations of international humanitarian and human rights law and possible war crimes,” Guterres said.
“And they require independent investigation for effective accountability.”
- Additional reporting by Tadgh McNally
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Glad all is well!! Wouldn’t like a case of the Christmas fear on that plane..
When I was flying home for Christmas this time last year and waiting to board the plane, I was looking out the terminal window and decided to Wikipedia the model of the plane I was about to fly on, read through its details and then got to the “Incidents” section, decided to keep on reading through all the “incidents”. I consider myself a very comfortable flyer normally but my god that flight was horrendous.. Thought the plane was done for about 50 times, the women next to me must have though I was about to hijack the plane I was so fidgety the entire flight. So a good tip for everyone flying home, don’t look up the crash history of the plane your about to fly on!
I am flying home tomorrow from Edinburgh to Cork on the same model as the one above that caught fire. It’s becoming tradition at this stage to scare myself before the flight. Hello airport bar.
What type of plane was it ?
ATR 72 i believe
It’s a Bombarider Q400
That’s the one Gary. Enjoy the read Tony.
Sorry its a de Havilland Canada DHC-8-402 Q400 not a ATR 72
The one in the story is a Bombardier Dash 8 Q400
Spot on Seanie
@Patrick. What kind of bird was it you flew on? Jon Snow believes that just because an Airbus A320 was in a crash it does not mean the A320 is an unsafe aircraft, it might mean that the a320 in question was very old, had poor maintenance, flying somewhere in sub saharan africa were there are no air safety regulations.
Regularly did Edinburgh Cork route this year too. Like a flying matchbox. Very susceptible to turbulence. Great Craic ha
Ah, Happy days then.
You know nothing Jon Snow..
(ATR 72)
I know somewhat Lord Bateman. May the 7 watch over you.
Sound and you too bud
Valium!!!
Patrick you will not be flying to Cork from Edinburgh on the same type of aircraft.
Indeed we call,then flying washing machines , they vibrate and jump around the sky as small planes do and it’s real flying . We flew into cork on one of them yokes and hit wind sheer and boy did that pilot swing it about so that for the last few 100 feet I could see all the way up the runway from my seat at the back of the plane and the pilot was way over to my right , and at last minute squared it off on the runway . To say I was a bit excited would be not exaggerating and I fly regularly but on bigger stuff. Remember we are only 100 years from doing a hop skip and a jump on a cloth covered latice work plane , now we have bars , showers so we are doing well .
‘Because there was no chute’. It’s 3 feet off the ground ffs….
Evacuating a couple of hundred people out of a tin can in a couple of minutes is no easy feat, no matter how close you are to the ground.
While true, this aircraft was a Bombardier Dash 8 Q400 which can carry in the largest version only 86 people.
Neal, it’s not a large jet. It’s a Dash 8 Q400 which can take 78 passengers. If it wasn’t possible to evacuate the plane safely, then the plane wouldn’t be allowed to fly in the EU.
This Mark
Engine fire, cut off power to engine, put out fire in engine, call for emergency landing, land plane on one engine. No problem to pilots they train for this and it’s an automatic reaction. Very scary for passengers though. Big problem for planes is not being to identify source of cabin smoke
Sorcery
Engineering Jon Snow. Designed to fly with one engine out. Flying with 2 engines out – now that’s sorcery. Unless it’s a 4 engined aircraft……then we’re back to engineering.
Blood magic is what it is. Jon Snow says NO!
Well done to the Pilot’s – anyone that call them flying bus drivers is an idiot.
Who flys a purple private plan
Dirk Diggler that’s who !
I’ve flown flyby several times and ive never enjoyed it. The planes are always the propeller ones and everything rattles so much, you start wondering is it safe. There’s no chute as they are so close to the ground, there’s only 2 steps to the plane.
That’s because their fleet are made of mostly turboprops. The fact they have propellors doesn’t mean the aircraft themselves are old WWII aircraft. In fact their fleet is a lot younger than most airlines you’ve probably flown with. Props are inherently noisier but the inner engine workings are the exact same as jet engine. They’re used by airlines,like Flybe, because of their fuel efficiency on the type of routes they operate.
The majority of their fleet is the Dash 8 which is a prop. They have a few jets but they are rarely used on routes to Ireland. They are not old, they are newer than most aircraft that other airlines have, and they are louder because of the propeller.
Well I won’t fly with them again
I never had an on time flight, there was always engine problems and the worse one was being delayed by 8 hours on Christmas eve
So all several times you travelled with them they had engine problems? Are you sure you’re not cursed?
If there is always engine problems for you, then you must be cursed! It is rare for engine failures to happen now with the modern engines, it was common in the past, which is one of the reasons why nearly all aircraft had 3 or 4 engines. As for the delay, it could have been caused by weather, and could happen any airline or aircraft.
Hmm… actually these aircraft would be more susceptible to weather delays then say an A320 so he could have a point.
Wonderful article to read whilst on the way to the airport to fly home for Christmas!!
Why land at an airport further away when you are on fire??
Look at the map shown, it is way closer to Belfast than any other airport.
There’s a range of reasons. The runway at Belfast City airport is a lot shorter than Aldergrove. Aldergrove is only a matter of minutes away anyway. Some aircraft types need to be configured differently for landing in the event of an engine shut down. This is to reduce the drag as the aircraft now has half the thrust available. This reduction in drag will increase the landing distance especially if the runway is wet and the aircraft is heavy. This may be one reason why the crew opted for Aldergrove.
have your say