Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE UNITED NATIONS said Yemen’s warring parties have agreed to renew an existing truce for another two months after concerted international efforts.
The already four-month-old ceasefire has been the longest nationwide ease in fighting since the country’s war began six years ago.
The UN envoy to Yemen Hans Grundberg said in a statement that the country’s internationally recognised government and the Houthi rebels had also agreed to try to arrive at “an expanded truce agreement as soon as possible”.
“In order to consolidate the opportunity provided by the truce to pivot toward sustainable peace, I will also intensify my efforts with the parties to reach as soon as possible an expanded truce agreement,” Grundberg said.
“I have shared with the parties a proposal for an expanded truce agreement, and I have received from both sides substantive comments on this proposal.”
Yemen’s civil war erupted in 2014, when the Houthis descended from their northern enclave and took over the capital, forcing the government to flee to the south before its exile in Saudi Arabia.
UN Envoy Grundberg announces that the parties agreed to extend the truce in #Yemen under the same terms for an additional 2 months. This extension includes a commitment to intensify negotiations to reach an expanded truce agreement as soon as possible. https://t.co/JVOfEDlYL9
— @OSE_Yemen (@OSE_Yemen) August 2, 2022
A Saudi-led coalition — then backed by the United States — entered the war in early 2015 to try to restore the government to power. Since then, the conflict has turned into a proxy war between regional foes Saudi Arabia and Iran, which backs the Houthis.
The truce renewal announcement came hours after an Omani delegation concluded three days of talks with the Houthi leadership, including with the rebels’ chief Abdel-Malek al-Houthi in the capital of Sanaa.
Mohammed Abdel-Salam, the Houthi chief negotiator and spokesman, said on Twitter the talks focused on “consolidating chances of halting the war and lifting the blockade” imposed by the Saudi Arabia-led coalition.
The ceasefire initially took effect on 2 April and was extended to 2 June. However, there have been offensive actions during recent months.
Both sides have publicly announced that they have bolstered their front-line positions, particularly around the oil-rich city of Marib, which the Houthis have been trying to seize for over a year.
There were also shows of power through through military parades featuring thousands of soldiers. The government and the Houthis both claimed to have documented dozens of truce violations on a weekly basis.
But the ceasefire has brought relief for Yemenis who have suffered from a decade of political turmoil and conflict. Around a third of Yemen’s 30 million population has been facing starvation due to the war and a lack of funding for humanitarian aid, according to the UN food agency.
Aside from the lull in violence, the truce established two commercial flights per week from Sanaa to Jordan and Egypt, after the country’s airport was closed to passenger flights for years.
It also allowed 36 vessels carrying fuel into the port of Hodeida over the course of four months. Both Sanaa and Hodeida are controlled by the Houthi rebels.
The truce has also called for opening the roads around Taiz, Yemen’s third largest city, which the Houthis have besieged for years. But the rebels rejected two UN proposals to lift the blockade, according to the envoy office.
Another item on the agenda is finding a way to pay the country’s public servants, many of whom have gone with little or no salaries for years due to the civil strife.
Today’s extension fell short of a proposed six-month renewal of the ceasefire, according to a government official. The Houthis had wanted more flights from Sanaa airport and more fuel vessels allowed to arrive in Hodeida to agree on that longer period.
The internationally recognised government would not discuss the Houthi demands before the opening of Taiz roads, the official said. He spoke on condition anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Basic implants would have a dramatically positive effect for all concerned- I commend Sinn Fein for raising & campaigning on this!
Julie, the minister isn’t putting a age limit on this. We know ourselves the longer it is before the child gets the second implant , the less impact that implant will have. I hope both billy and Liam will get there’s soon, they both deserve it. We won’t give up this fight until they do get it. We are just trying to highlight that these kids need this to happen now, not years down the line
Well said Deanna.
Hi Deanna, I am going by what is in the article about and also press release statements by HNE the above states” Her own son Billy is going to be at five at Christmas, getting nearer to the cut-off age of seven. This shows that there is a cut off age. I had presumed that this is something HNE had discussed with the minister and that there was some ‘criteria’ in place. Up to now I had heard the cut off point being mentioned as 5.
As the mother of a child that was only implanted last year with one implant as he is a misdiagnoses case in Audiology and is now age 6 it was very important that the HNE campaign would get the message across to the Mistier that as a group they would not accept an age limit being put on children who needed a second implant. Research shows that more children will have acquired hearing loss than children born deaf. This means that they will enter the services at a later age, it is vital that the minister do not put an age restriction on which children are editable for the second implant. The minister needs to now announce if Bilateral implant were to go ahead what the criteria would be. My son’s spoken language after wearing the implant one year is that of a hearing child of the same age. However there is a pay back, he uses a huge amount of energy concentrating and he get tired very easily. He, just like the younger age group of children, needs the second implant especially as we are now hoping to move him to mainstream school. I would urge parents of children over 5 to write to the minister demanding to know the criteria. As I also wear an Implant myself I know that implants can be very successful later in life so there is no reason why a child over 5 would not benefit from bilateral implants. A surgeon has no way of saying that a child over 5 would not be successful with a bilateral implant and issuing this information to the media is just misleading.
Also love to look at why some kids with disabilities are not even considered for implants even when they desperately need them. Especially if they were deem suitable in the UK but not in Ireland.
No the taxpayer is not expected to pick up the tab for everything.
Hope you never have a medical condition that you cannot afford to pay for yourself!!
Is the tax payer just expected to pick up the tab for everything in this country???
Would you prefer to give more money to bank share holders? That’s where most of the money went. This is to help children hear. What kind of person would voice a complaint against that?
The kids can hear after one implant, they can hear slightly better with a second one. The state should pay for one and they can have a bleeding raffle or a sponsored run or some shit for the second one.
After being implanted it can take up to six months before a child begins to make sense of the new sounds and start to make progress. A huge danger with having one implant is that if it fails (and they do for a variety of reasons) that child must then have it removed, heal up, be re-implanted and begin a further possible 6month + of relearning to hear before any progress is made on the very long road to learning speach. Is that acceptable? How is a child supposed to cope with that? How are they to continue in education? How far will they be set back? It is scary what is seen as an acceptable standard of living these days. Since gaining control of the country the government have consistently targeted the most vulnerable in our society and that must change. Everything except the air we breath is taxed. We all are taxpayers. I for one would prefer to see our taxes used to help the vulnerable people of Ireland.
I am a tax payer, as is my husband, as is my family. I am sure that my tax goes to support other people in other ways and that is ok. I believe if you have children yourself that they get free dental care, free eye test ect. Well it just so happens through no fault of their own that our children were either born deaf or through genetic conditions, illness such as meningitis, measles, glue ears ect that they lost their hearing. I would not wish the stress on any parents but anybody could find themselves in our boat. Our tax payers money is now paying for universal medical cards for all children under 5 yet you expect our children to go around with one ear! Try it yourself. Block up one ear with cotton wool until it is really blocked up and you cant hear a thing from that ear. Then try and go about your life. Go to work. See what happens if someone talks to you from the ‘wrong side’ try sitting in a big meeting and see how you get on. Try answering the phone with the blocked up ear. Then come back here and tell me that you only need one ear! All of these children in order to meet the criteria will have profound loss, this means they cannot hear the tv with that ear, they cant hear on the phone, they cant hear a radio. Cochlear implants are best effective at a distance of one metre from the speaker. Further than this and information will be missed. Can you imagine a child’s life. They are constantly on the move, people around them are moving. It is a challenge for any child with one implant to hear. I can only hope that you will do as I suggest and become ‘deaf’ for a day and maybe then you wont mind tax payers money being used to pay for cochlear implants. But remember as you get older and older it will be my son and children like him that will be paying taxes to look after you! Will they be as hard cut, I don’t think so, life lessons will teach them that each member of society is valuable and deserves the best chance in life.
Hi David Broderick,
The fear with one implant can also be around the external pieces/ processor breaking. There can also be issues with the battery not working. Not all the children on the Implant programme are living near Beaumont Hospital Dublin many travel in excess of over 4 hours to get there. So if the external processor breaks it may have to be sent away to be fixed, in this time the child is plunged back into a world of silence. Many parents like me know what it is like to get the dreaded orange light on the processor to tell you that it is not working properly and to feel the fear of god go through you. Your child is in a panic, they have no ‘back up,’ they cant hear a sound and now suddenly the implant is not working. Well you ring Beaumont to be told it will be two days or more before they can see you. In this time your child is not hearing. If the child had two implants life would go on until the other one was fixed and the child would not be distressed.
have your say