Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Any sector could be asked to cut emissions further to absorb unallocated reductions - minister

No sector has yet been responsible for a total of 5.25 megatonnes of emissions.

THE MINISTER FOR Climate has said that every sector could potentially be asked to cut emissions further to absorb as-yet unallocated reductions.

Minister Eamon Ryan defended the government’s decision to leave some emissions cuts that must be made to meet Ireland’s national targets unallocated to any area of society in the breakdown that it outlined this summer.

While sector-by-sector targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions were announced earlier in July, no sector was made responsible yet for a total of 5.25 megatonnes of CO2 equivalent (Mt CO2eq).

The government also chose to defer a target for land-use and forestry by 18 months pending a land-use strategy.

Appearing before the Oireachtas Committee on Environment and Climate Action this afternoon, Minister Ryan said that every sector potentially could be required to further cut emissions when the rest of the reduction is distributed.

He said he believed it was “absolutely appropriate” for the government to wait to allocate the emissions.

The minister said that revised scientific information received “at the last minute” indicated that emissions from the land-use sector were closer to seven million tonnes than the previous understanding of 4.8 million.

“I think it was absolutely appropriate in those circumstances not to rush through or to try to conclude on that scientific evidence as to the quantity of further emissions reductions or further reducing the source of emissions from the land-use sector,” he told the committee. 

The sectoral emissions ceilings were a major source of political debate as the Dáil began its summer recess.

The reduction in the agriculture sector’s emissions was a particular point of contention as the industry, backed by some politicians, tried to push for a low target. 

Discussions at Cabinet and between the coalition leaders, as well as the agriculture minister, eventually settled on the following reductions:

  • Electricity – 75%
  • Transport – 50%
  • Commercial and public buildings – 45%
  • Residential Buildings – 40%
  • Industry – 35%
  • Agriculture – 25%
  • Others (including petroleum refining and waste) – 50% 

They also chose at that time to defer the target for land-use and forestry by 18 months and left 5.25 Mt CO2eq unallocated.

“5.25 MtCO2eq of annual emissions reductions are currently unallocated on an economy-wide basis for the second carbon budget period (2026-2030). These will be allocated following a mid-term review and identification of additional abatement measures,” a government statement said. 

Concerns have been raised since about the unallocated reduction and whether the government is risking an overreliance on technologies that are not yet available or in existence.

“I think it’s absolutely appropriate for us to complete and to use the land use review, which we’re doing, which will give us a much better understanding… particularly in the managing of wetlands and management of bogs, forestry, and grasslands,” Minister Ryan said today.

“I think in those circumstances it was absolutely appropriate to wait for the final allocation or to have a category which we said was pending the conclusion of such review, and then, as we committed to in the Programme for Government, to adjust the allocations accordingly as soon as we have the relevant information and we’re working flat out on that.”

“In terms of the further adjustments to the budgets, the reallocations, every sector potentially will have to or could play a part in that.

“It does require us to have an understanding to complete the land-use review, because that’ll give us a better idea of what the quantum is in that particular sector and then we’ll have better idea of what is potentially required elsewhere.”

He said he believed the government’s approach was better than “just pretending” to have the answer.

Earlier this month, the Climate Change Advisory Council described the announcement of the sectoral targets as a “welcome milestone” but one that fell short of important markers.

In its annual report, the Council said that the “targets announced do not provide all of the necessary clarity in terms of how the carbon budgets are allocated at a sectoral level, how the overall target of 51% reduction by 2030 will be met, or how the Land Use Sector will be included in meeting the targets”.

“As presently expressed the quantified emissions reductions only amount to a reduction of 42% excluding the Land Use Sector and are therefore not consistent with the objective in the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development (Amendment) Act,” the report detailed.

“Whilst these targets are a useful starting point, they will need to be revised upwards and monitored closely in the light of experience.”

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Ireland and internationally is a crucial measure to limit global temperature rises and prevent further devastation to the planet caused by climate change.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
20 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Karen NíDhochartaigh
    Favourite Karen NíDhochartaigh
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 7:41 AM

    Am I the only one that thinks this was over dramatised. The students could still answer the question. So what that there was 3 possible correct answers… It just means that you still had to know what you were doing(and isn’t that what the exam is for)to get a right answer.
    In my opinion they make the maths papers easier every year and still complain about how many fail. I never got bonus points for siting the honors paper and without a caculator to boot. We need to overhall our methods of teaching then we can worry about the exams.

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Elisabeth Butler
    Favourite Elisabeth Butler
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 8:54 AM

    You cannot overhaul methods of teaching with the current exam in place, I dare say if the exam were different so would the teaching.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Elisabeth Butler
    Favourite Elisabeth Butler
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 8:52 AM

    Wow, he’s really on the ball! That only took him, what….10 days?

    47
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jim Lenihan
    Favourite Jim Lenihan
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 1:32 PM

    this happens year after year start at the top wipe the lot out including mr quin. put in a team that have passed their leaving cert who can check their qus… befour they send out

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute bacoxy
    Favourite bacoxy
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 7:52 AM

    Here’s a maths problem… John works in an overspending overemployed and over unionised public service sector job that oversees the production of state exam papers. There were a number of errors in the final papers handed to students and the minister in charge wants to investigate what went wrong and how it could happen. Questions: A) How many public service sector workers will it take to investigate what happened? B) How many will actually be used? C)How much extra money will it cost to discover the causes and produce a report for the minister?

    45
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David O Brien
    Favourite David O Brien
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 8:11 AM

    Let’s scape goat some poor official trying his/her best.
    The minister is responsible – why ? See below

    Paper One / Higher Level (EV) English
    Paper One / Higher Level (IV) Irish
    Paper One: Project Maths / Higher (EV)
    Paper One: Project Maths / Higher (IV)
    Paper One / Foundation Level (EV)
    Paper One / Foundation Level (IV)
    Paper One: Project Maths/F’dation (EV)
    Paper One: Project Maths /F’dation (IV)
    Paper One / Ordinary Level (EV)
    Paper One / Ordinary Level (IV)
    Paper One: Project Maths / Ordinary
    Paper One: Project Maths / Ordinary(IV)
    Paper Two: Project Maths / Higher (EV)
    Paper Two: Project Maths / Higher (IV)
    Paper Two / Foundation Level (EV)
    Paper Two / Foundation Level (IV)
    Paper Two: Project Maths /F’dation(EV)
    Paper Two: Project Maths / F’dation(IV)
    Paper Two / Ordinary Level (EV)
    Paper Two / Ordinary Level (IV)
    Paper Two: Project Maths/Ordinary(EV)
    Paper Two: Project Maths / Ordinary(IV)
    CONFUSED YET?

    Now add massive cuts in funding in education.
    Add political ideology to the mix and business lead education agenda.

    44
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute WanderArch
    Favourite WanderArch
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 8:37 AM

    I’ve no idea what your point is?

    42
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Carcu Sidub
    Favourite Carcu Sidub
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 9:40 AM

    Wander

    Neither does the Minister, the Department or the State Examinations Commission. Thats why the whole thing is a mess.

    4
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Warren Collier
    Favourite Warren Collier
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 9:48 AM

    How long did it take to type that?

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Colin C
    Favourite Colin C
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 2:28 PM

    And how long would it take two men with two shovels to type that twice?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Clifford Brennan
    Favourite Clifford Brennan
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 7:58 AM

    Investigation will cost 10million, take 3 years and not have any discernible outcome.

    43
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael G O'Reilly
    Favourite Michael G O'Reilly
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 9:35 AM

    Don’t see what the fuss is about ! If there were possibly three right answers then all three should be marked as correct ! Also isnt how a student approached a problem more important than a correct answer. M xx

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute rodrigo detriano
    Favourite rodrigo detriano
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 7:37 AM

    I’d imagine that whoever set the question will be fired.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Campbell
    Favourite John Campbell
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 7:41 AM

    Not if they can give a correct reason three times!!

    56
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Begrudgy
    Favourite Begrudgy
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 7:45 AM

    Won’t be fired if they are in the Union. Probably will be moved and retrained in setting English exam questions. First though they need at least 6 months off on sick leave due to stress.

    41
    See 7 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute simonjblake
    Favourite simonjblake
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 7:56 AM

    You must be joking Roderigo. They are civil servants. Incompetence is a pre requisite.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Peter Gavin
    Favourite Peter Gavin
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 8:00 AM

    You can’t fire a public servant no matter how bad they are at their job. They will probably get a promotion as a way to move them from the role of setting exam papers without upsetting the union

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute rodrigo detriano
    Favourite rodrigo detriano
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 8:08 AM

    Simon. Yes I actually was joking. Maybe a pay cut would be more appropriate!

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute WanderArch
    Favourite WanderArch
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 8:32 AM

    “You can’t fire a public servant no matter how bad they are at their job”.
    Yes you can. Ask any doctor or nurse.
    Make other public servants legally responsible for their actions. You’d solve a lotta problems very quickly.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Peter Daly
    Favourite Peter Daly
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 8:52 AM

    Like Quinn himself …. a mistake.
    Like Gilmore …..another mistake.
    Like Howlin…..yet another mistake !
    Sack them too .
    Shatter ……big mistake.
    Hogan……..big mistake.
    Reilly ………big mistake.
    Yet nobody taking responsibility for any of those mistakes !

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute eric nelligan
    Favourite eric nelligan
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 9:32 AM

    Rodigo, the exam was not set wrong, the mistake was made in the production/typing of the paper. As I’m sure you are aware the mistake was on the English version but the Irish version was correct.

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Carcu Sidub
    Favourite Carcu Sidub
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 9:43 AM

    Peter

    Imagine how much better Ireland would be if condoms had been available when those mistakes were being made!

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cian Byrne
    Favourite Cian Byrne
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 1:35 PM

    How ironic that I managed to do better in applied maths than maths! thats project maths for ya!

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute beansy
    Favourite beansy
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 9:15 AM

    Poor public servants + terrible minister = examination cock ups.

    Now that’s math!!

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gary.
    Favourite Gary.
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 2:28 PM

    Poor private sector = massive recession. That beats a simple typo on an exam paper any day. :)

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eamonn O' Neill
    Favourite Eamonn O' Neill
    Report
    Jun 22nd 2013, 12:28 PM

    Questions were asked that aren’t on the new course!? There is so much confusion over what students actually need to know walking into their project maths exam. There’s all this stuff about different ‘phases’ of new course and the different textbooks and extra material not in the books make it impossible to follow. It seems the people writing the papers don’t really know what’s on the course either.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Harry Price
    Favourite Harry Price
    Report
    Jun 21st 2013, 12:01 PM

    3 billion cant add yet gets the big job . Leaving cert mistake or down right count care less or are they looking for the big job

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds