We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
A MAN LINKED to the film that has sparked massive global protests by Muslims has been questioned but not arrested, US authorities have said.
Fifty-five-year-old Nakoula Bassely Nakoula was interviewed at a Los Angeles sheriff’s station but was not detained.
Nakoula has previously been convicted of financial crimes and, as part of his sentence, he was banned from using computers or the Internet. Officers are now examining whether he broke the rules of his probation.
It is understood that the film itself does not violate any American laws.
Federal authorities in the US have identified Nakoula, a self-described Coptic Christian, as the key figure behind ‘Innocence of Muslims’, a film denigrating Islam and the Prophet Muhammad that ignited mob violence against US embassies across the Middle East. It has also sparked protests in London and Sydney.
The 14-minute trailer for the film depicts the prophet Mohammad as a womaniser, a child molester and general buffoon. It was first uploaded to YouTube in June but was later translated into Arabic in the week before the 11 September anniversary.
US website Gawker has interviewed members of the cast of “Innocence of Muslims,” who say they were duped into appearing in what they thought was a fictional epic, only to discover their lines had been dubbed over with anti-Muslim propaganda. It also was named the film’s director as 65-year-old Alan Roberts.
Violent protests set off by the film in Libya played a role in mob attacks in Benghazi that killed US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other American officials. US Embassy gates in Cairo were breached by protesters and demonstrations against American missions spread to Yemen on Thursday and on Friday to several other countries.
Meanwhile, Al Qaeda’s branch in Yemen has praised the killing of Stevens and has called for more attacks. In a statement published online, the terrorist group encouraged more assaults to expel American embassies from Muslim nations.
Protests continued in Egypt, Afghanistan and Pakistan today with massive anti-American sentiments.
-Additional reporting by AP and AFP
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Extend it to 19year olds on condition they remain in school to complete their Leaving Certificate.
Dependant schoolgoers everywhere where parental income is less than €200k? Doesn’t seem at all unfair….
From someone who would have benefited from it (damn December children!), I can appreciate that it has to end sometimes. It would be better to give the option of remaining in receipt of it if below a certain income threshold, or getting tax relief for dependant children in full time education. This should also include 18 year olds in secondary, and those continuing on to college.
Better still give the child benefit to the child at 18 provided they are still in 2nd level school to encourage them to complete and move into 3rd level . If there’s only 7% involved then that’s small shekels . It’s a win win situation and give them a little pocket money which they will spend ploughing it back into the economy and thus helping others. My little one will be eighteen on 28th feb and still has one more year in school and is not considered and there’s many others . Cmon minister cop on and at least extend to any child who is still in 2nd level schools .
My son turned 18 in the oct of his leaving cert year. He is still a dependant and the leaving cert is a very expensive year. You have exam fee, maybe grinds to pay for, cao, college day trips etc. There are little or mo jobd available in small towns so its difficult for them to get even partime work. Child benefit would help ease the pressure. It should be payed until june of when they leave school.
An expensive year alright. And as his parent you certainly shouldn’t have pay for it. The gullible taxpayers of Ireland are more than happy to pick up the bill.
Alan, I pay my taxes to ensure that we have a fair and equal society for all, including children. It’s fair to say that the majority of children in the state are not mine, but I do not begrudge every one the subsistence to ensure they will be fed, housed and educated regardless of their parents.
Alan O Connor will this young man not be a tax payer some day funding your your old age pension and multi hospital visits when your close to kicking the bucket. He seems like a good investment to me and his mother should get all the help she needs to help educate the future….
Any child at school should receive child benefit, well parents should. As a parent of a daughter in college in UK and one in LC and no way of getting any help or grants and the child allowance taken off my daughter last July because she was 18 but still a year left in school, it’s a struggle. If she left school at 17 or 18 she would be getting the dole. But then that’s the way our government work, as they don’t live in the real world.
It probably should increased by a year to 19 but I’m sure if there were 19 year olds sitting the Leaving Cert they were probably only 19 by a few months.
Does that 7% include mature students ?
Are the figures slightly skewed ?
Not really. Most of us started school at 4 and finished when we were 17. Most kids are 5 now when they start school and finish at 18, 19 if they do Transition Year.
I will receive no child benefit for the last year of my sons schooling as he will be 18 the September he begins 6th year
My son sat his leaving cert. last June and child benefit stopped in June when he was 17 and only turned 18 in September, tbh it’s not 18 but the end of the academic year, and to get a job you have to have experience his cb was stopped no notification about this well there are peeps that abuse the system. So many families were affected by this and only receive back pay if u go to college not everyone goes to college.
Well if he wasn’t going to further education he would be doing something to earn a wage (or looking anyway) in which case he isn’t a dependant child anymore. Also saying you had no idea it was coming is a bit disingenuous, you knew he was coming to the end of his school years.
I do think families with dependant kids in full time education should continue to receive it. But some people’s sense of entitlement is baffling.
Sk bit all over the place there. If her son only sat the lc in june how did he know he was going on to full time education? Exam results or college offers dont come out as soon as you leave the exam hall.
Exactly, who is to know whether or not they will go on to full time education? As soon as they walk out the exam hall they are available to work….
To be honest a child is a dependant child at 17 cb stopped in June wen 17. It shud continue until he turns 18 simple as. Yes, he did have a job but had to wait 6 months to start and no company would take anyone on for 6 months. Well I am a carer and its a very limited amount and would of been
Better to contine, obviously you don’t know or understand how expensive LC is.
Yvonne, CB is only given until children are 16 unless they are still in school. When they turn 16, you have to get a form stamped by the school stating when the child is expected to finish. That’s why it stops in the June, because that’s the information provided by the school.
I do know how expensive LC is, that’s why I said all LC students regardless of age should be entitled to the benefit. However, the day after they finish the LC they are free to work. I, and most people I was in school with were out working or looking for work the week after the leaving cert.
Now if they continue on to full time education, they are no longer available to work and families should get the payment in order to support them.
There are plenty of jobs that will take people on for short term work. It sounds like your son wanted to go out and doss around for the summer, but for some reason you expect tax payers to fund him to do this?
NO ! Child benefit needs to be means tested or at least taxable. Outrageous that families earning €75,000 a year getting hand-out from the State… #no shame
I am so sorry I got an education and worked bloody hard to earn the 75k a year just so that I can fund 52% of it for you.
I wouldn’t get out of bed for 75k.
But the whole argument that people who earn 75k deserve child benefit because they work hard is silly…..
Child benefit is a benefit not a reward, plus are you saying people who earn 25k don’t work hard?
Seriously smug there man.
Wasn’t meant to be smug (and I am sorry if it came across that way – next time I need to take a breath before hammering at the old keyboard) and I am not saying that people earning 25k don’t work hard either. Anyway at the end of the day it is all about the children.
It shouldnt be a reward for the prosperous it should be an aid for those less fortunate than yourself. Should the better off get grants to send their kids to college so they can make 75k a year after? Your grand contribution might be less if anyone who brings their kid to school in a land rover didn’t get their petrol money from the aul cb
If they’re over 16 they can get a job. There’s no need to change the rules on this. There are far more deserving causes to give that money to e.g. children with life threatening illnesses who can’t get a medical card!
Or phone calls to Kenya.
The guru your name certainly doesnt give you insight. There ate no jobs for teenagers. Especially im small towns. Nothing as most deserving as supporting our young prople through the education process. As these youngsters are our future!
You saying if they’re over 16 they can get a job is a bit like me saying if they need one they can get a medical card. Narrow minded and ignorant.
Guru,
I am a parent bringing up my child on my own. I work full-time and my wages are the only income coming into the house (no other benefits, supports or maintenance). My child is about to turn 18 this month and will complete the Leaving Cert in 2016 due to undertaking Transition Year.
As a result of the work experience gained during TY my child did secure a part-time job. He was lucky to get the job, even living in the Dublin area these jobs are rare and the jobs that are available usually entail extremely long hours. It became impossible for him to continue with the part-time job hours as he was working the entire weekend, from 9am until late in the evening on Saturday and Sunday. The volume of homework required to do well at LC made it impossible to continue with the job in the long term.
Child Benefit will be stopped in a couple of months time. When the water rates begin he will be 18 and I presume we will be classed as a two adult household (I cannot find clarity on this on the water.ie website).
As a single parent working full-time, I also take care of the house, washing, cooking, cleaning etc., so my working week entails very long hours. I don’t receive any other benefits and we are fully self-supporting. So, please do tell me how the reduction in Child Benefit is fair to a family like mine and how we are not deserving of this payment.
Your “child” can get a job. One can work on weekends and in the evenings and still do the leaving cert. There’s more to life than the Leaving Cert anyway.
Guru is right, anyone over 16 can work.
Why does everyone feel sorry for themselves on these comments section?
A kid can skip transition year. That’s an easy way to do the leaving exam a year earlier.
Child benefit should be means tested just like university fees. Why give benefits to people who don’t need them?
You know any children that would fail a means test?
A few…. Not sure what your point is.
Benefit is NOT paid to children…. Give it to parents who NEED it
Trust me, the means test for Uni does not cover people who ‘need it’. The government’s idea of what people should be able to survive on is disgusting. As someone whose parents struggled beyond belief, along with working every job I could in college, just to get me through and qualified while the government said we should have no problem covering costs, I can tell you that the government hasnt a clue what its on about money wise, and clearly neither do you.
I agree- there should be an income threshold and then a sliding scale so parents on the lowest incomes get the most. They should also stop paying it to people whose children do not reside with them here in R.o.I; this state pays one of the highest rates of CB in Europe and yet it is being claimed for children who live in countries where it costs a fraction to feed, clothe and educate a child of what it costs here! Then they could easily afford to reinstate the ayment to parents with offspring in full-time education up until they reach 22 years of age. They still get it up until 22 in the UK and it is outrageous that they have stopped it here.I will be supporting my son for over a year yet and I am now 2 months without it, trying to manage on 140 Euros a month less than what I was and that was not much so I am getting desperate.He is applying for jobs for the summer but we live in a village,I can’t afford to get him driving lessons, never mind a car and most jobs are given to relatives around here and we do not have much family in the area.I am scared to death really.This is so cruel on behalf of the government but they don’t give a damn about people like us and I can’t beleive the begrudgers! If I earnt 75K a year I would happily give up CB so people WHOSE CHILDREN LIVE HERE and who really needed it could have it for as long as their kids were in full time education AND they could have MORE!
I have twins who were 18 in May the year before they sat their leaving cert. This meant a drop in my monthly income of two amounts of child benefit, plus the extra amount for twins. I have a child 5 years younger than the twins. This caused so much hardship for us. As a single mum, child benefit was an essential part of our income, that really just about kept our heads above water. The ruthlessness of the cut off point at age 18 needs to be addressed. It should be continued until the young person has finished their leaving cert, rather than at 18.
Providing a picture of the Senator would be a more useful indicator of who not to vote for at Election time.
Universal child benefit needs to be stopped. I didn’t ask for it, don’t especially need it but get it anyway.
You can inform the DSP you longer wish to receive it,they’ll happily stop it for you.Somehow I don’t think you will though.
I’ve just checked form CB56 and there is no option to refuse the money without lying to the DSP
You’re wrong, try harder.
You can stop the payment if you genuinely wish to do so.
“Senator for Carlow/Kilkenny, Pat O’Neill”
Just to point out that there are no geographic constituencies for the election of Senators. He was elected by county Councillors nationally and so he is a national politician. Just because he says he is Senator for Carlow/Kilkenny in his press release, doesn’t mean you should copy the line as is.
Why do so many people in Ireland rely on government support? it’s not normal.
have your say