Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
POLITICIANS, IT HAS been said, campaign in poetry but govern in prose. The soaring rhetoric of the hustings rarely survives the meat grinder of deal-making and realpolitik.
When US presidential candidate Joe Biden in 2020 promised “no more drilling on federal lands, period. Period, period, period” he unconsciously echoed a similar pledge made 32 years earlier by George H. Bush, when he said: “read my lips: no new taxes”.
That pledge was to come back to haunt Bush as, sure enough, taxes went up just two years later and this is widely seen as one of the reasons he failed to get re-elected.
Whether Biden’s apparent u-turn in recently authorising an $8 billion plan – known as the Willow project – to drill for 600 million barrels of oil on pristine federal lands deep inside the Arctic Circle comes back to hurt his re-election chances at the end of next year remains to be seen, but it has caused deep dismay in progressive and environmental circles as the latest political capitulation to Big Oil.
It appears that the Biden administration took the political decision not to fight oil giant ConocoPhillips, the company promoting the Willow project as a refusal would almost certainly be overturned in the (Republican-dominated) courts and could likely cost the US government up to $5 billion in compensation claims for lost revenues.
As an attempt to salvage something from the situation, the US government has forced the Willow project to scale back from five to three drilling sites, and ConocoPhillips has agreed to give up leases it held on around 68,000 acres.
The Biden administration is also issuing new rules to block future oil and gas leases on more than half of the 23 million acres with the area in Alaska known as the National Petroleum Reserve, as well as 2.8 million acres of the Beaufort Sea in the Arctic Ocean.
While this sounds encouraging, bear in mind that a future Republican administration could simply overturn these protections, as Donald Trump did to a raft of environmental and climate measures put in place by Barack Obama.
While it may come as cold comfort, Biden was clearly deeply unhappy at having to sign off on the Willow project. During his recent address to the Oireachtas, he described climate change as “the single existential threat to the world”, adding that “we don’t have a lot of time, and that’s a fact”.
Biden has seen the evidence with his own eyes. “I’ve flown over more territory in the United States since I’ve been President, in a helicopter, that has been burned to the ground equal to the entire state of Maryland”.
Political talk is of course cheap. For instance, does anyone for a moment seriously imagine our own Taoiseach Leo Varadkar has even begun to grapple with the climate emergency as the key existential issue of his generation?
Biden, I believe, is different, and he proved it last year when he sunk huge political capital into delivering a $369 billion climate investment package, which he modestly described as “the most significant legislation in history” as part of his Inflation Reduction Act.
Expert assessments calculate this could lead to around a 40% reduction in US emissions by 2030, as it engages the levers of large-scale investment to nudge the entire economy on a lower-emissions pathway.
Yes, he lost the Willow battle, but in the overall climate war, Biden is using his decades of experience as a deal-maker and his reputation as a moderate to steer genuinely transformative change at a rate and pace than completely eluded his former boss Barack Obama.
Is it really enough, given the hellish threats posed by climate breakdown? Almost certainly not, but for progressives contemplating staying at home in the 2024 presidential election in protest at the Willow decision, they may need a reality check and to recall the ecocidal Trump regime and how it shredded decades of hard-won environmental regulations as well as attempting to sabotage global climate negotiations.
If either Trump or the equally worrying Ron DeSantis were to enter the White House in January 2025, the Willow debacle would be the very least of our worries. With potential global ecological collapse almost within touching distance, just one more term with a climate denier in charge of the world’s most powerful country should suffice to push us over the edge.
While identifying as a progressive, I’ve never considered myself a US political fan-boy. When Bill Clinton and Barack Obama came to Dublin, I watched it on TV but stayed away, despite living locally. Yet last weekend I joined thousands of others on the long road to Ballina to witness Joe Biden’s final Irish address.
Why the change of heart? Partly, it was the sheer relief that Biden had – at least for now – saved US democracy from being dragged headlong into authoritarianism and fascism in 2020 by MAGA extremists. But mostly it was in recognition of the fact that Biden, Willow notwithstanding, has made real, sustained efforts to show leadership in averting climate catastrophe.
Whatever your politics, your personal or religious views or whatever issues are most precious to you, all of these will be wiped away if we fail to prevent global ecological and climate collapse. In short, if we get this wrong, nothing else will matter, ever again and the future itself will become little more than a rapidly fading memory.
I’m firmly on the side of whoever is fighting to make sure this doesn’t come to pass. Who can say if we’ll succeed? All I know for sure is we cannot afford to fail.
John Gibbons is an environmental journalist and commentator.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
“Amazingly the pilot finished the flight” , wtf was he supposed to do get out and walk off ?.
Put the plane down at the nearest suitable and safe landing strip, would be the preferred option. Not continuing on and finishing the full scheduled route with a damaged aircraft and probable damage to its radar systems located in the nose cone
@Wayne
The problem is the pilot did not receive authorisation to divert or land at the nearest airport
Larissa, and that’s where the “amazing” part comes in, the pilot managed to complete a flight with a badly damaged aircraft, and most likely a damaged radar. It was a response to a comment not the story
@Wayne
Okay, there was a slight misunderstanding then :)
But it just goes to show, that it’s probably the safest option to keep your seatbelt fastened at all times, I’m surprised no-one got injured by hitting the overhead lockers
The Chinese ATC were a bunch of pr!cks for not letting the plane fly around the storm, they also endangered the people on the plane.
Yeah but you wont hear much condemnation around here from the pro commies
An emergency landing in North Korea. That would be fun.
All crew and passengers would be arrested on the spot and used by Kim Jong Un as hostages to lift the sanctions off North Korea, or executed on the spot for being spies
Why all the red thumbs? Anything is possible in North Korea considering one of the Generals was killed not so long ago with an anti-aircraft gun, don’t underestimate the power of an underfed brainwashed country
A country that would be left to starve and rot if the US was to withdraw food aid.
It’ll probably cost them more to get the smell of $hit out of the aircraft than it’ll take to replace the nose!!
I’d be most worried about the engines … They also got hit just as much as the nose ….
Never unbuckle seat belt incase of a sudden draft wind
747′s are a serious plane. They have an amazing safety record. I’m not surprised this one carried on. It’s a real shame these planes won’t be around much longer.
Why won’t they be around much longer? Boeing are full for orders for 2 years?
Yup- but not for for 747s -
There’s always the 800s coming off the production line.
They are on the way to being extinct. All the big 747 airlines are retiring their fleets and replacing with more fuel efficient 777 dreamliners and the like. Even the Airbus a380s are now under threat. Planes with 4 engines are a big no no now. Boeing predict that the only 747s they will manufacture in the future will be for the president of the USA. A sad future prediction for probably the greatest aircraft ever manufactured
Unfortunately the majority are freighters and not passenger planes.
That’s not the point. Boeing have oodles of orders for jumbos. Doesn’t matter to them if they are passenger or freighters. We will have 747s in the air for all of our lifetimes.
Yes for 747s mark.
Yes but you or I may never be on one ever again Cian, unless someone mails you in a box to China. Also alot of those orders are up in the air. Airlines are changing their minds everyday. Google search ‘end of the jumbo’ and you will find lots of articles. Interesting reading.
There are only 30 of the newer variant passenger plane flying today Cian. I’m pretty sure they won’t make a nice or any profit off those numbers.
I’d say that was fun for the passengers…not!
A sheep on here called someone else brainwashed.
Only on the journal.
have your say