We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
BRITAIN’S PRINCE WILLIAM has allegedly recently reached a settlement with publisher News Group Newspapers – which is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp – over claims of hacking, the UK’s High Court has been told.
News of the settlement was revealed in court documents today as a three-day hearing in London involving William’s brother, Harry, and actor Hugh Grant got under way.
Harry is suing News Group Newspapers, publisher of the Sun and the now-defunct News Of The World, over alleged unlawful information gathering at its titles.
News Group is asking Mr Justice Fancourt to throw out both claims, arguing they have been brought too late.
But, responding to the publisher’s strike-out application, Harry’s lawyers said it is an attempt to go behind a “secret agreement” between the royal family as an institution and News Group, which Harry was informed of in 2012.
In documents before the court, David Sherborne, representing Harry, said the late Queen Elizabeth was involved in “discussions and authorisation” of the agreement, which was that members of the royal family would not pursue claims against News Group until after the conclusion of the litigation over hacking.
Sherborne said in written arguments that the agreement “meant that the claimant could not bring a claim against News Group for phone hacking at that time”.
He added: “It was agreed directly between these parties, as opposed to their lawyers … that at the conclusion of the Mobile Telephone Voicemail Interception Litigation (MTVIL) News would admit or settle such a claim with an apology.
“In 2017, the claimant and the institution began to push for the outstanding claim to be resolved.
“However, News filibustered in relation to this until, in 2019, the claimant had enough and issued his claim.”
Sherborne said William has “recently settled his claim against NGN behind the scenes”.
Kensington Palace declined to comment on behalf of the Prince of Wales.
In part of a witness statement prepared for the hearing, Harry said: “My brother and I were also told by either the institution’s solicitor … or someone else from the institution that there was no possibility of either of us bringing a claim against NGN for phone hacking at that time.
“The rationale behind this was that a secret agreement had been reached between the institution and senior executives at NGN whereby members of the royal family would bring phone hacking claims only at the conclusion of the Mobile Telephone Voicemail Interception Litigation and at that stage the claims would be admitted or settled with an apology.
“The reason for this was to avoid the situation where a member of the royal family would have to sit in the witness box and recount the specific details of the private and highly sensitive voicemails that had been intercepted by Clive Goodman.
“The institution was incredibly nervous about this and wanted to avoid at all costs the sort of reputational damage that it had suffered in 1993 when The Sun and another tabloid had unlawfully obtained and published details of an intimate telephone conversation that took place between my father and stepmother in 1989, while he was still married to my mother.
“This agreement, including the promises from NGN for delayed resolution was, obviously, a major factor as to why no claim was brought by me at that time.”
Anthony Hudson KC, for NGN, said the publisher’s position is that “there was no such secret agreement”.
He added that, while communications show “discussions took place between the Palace and NGN in 2017-2018 about resolving outstanding issues relating to allegations of (voicemail interception), they do not provide any support for a suggestion that there was an agreement by which NGN would forgo its right to bring a limitation defence in response to any claims by members of the royal family”.
Hudson argued that Harry and Hugh Grant have been “front and centre” of claims against the publisher over hacking and therefore could not possibly have failed to realise they had a potential damages claim much sooner.
The hearing is expected to last three days and the judge will determine whether their claims will progress to a trial, which is due to be heard in January next year.
The claim is one of a number of legal actions currently being brought by Prince Harry, who appeared in person at the High Court last month for a preliminary hearing against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail On Sunday.
He is also expected to give evidence at a trial over allegations of unlawful information against tabloid publisher Mirror Group Newspapers, due to begin next month, with Harry due to appear in court in June.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Murducks gutter press pumping out hate lies and fear to the poorly educated all for money
One rich person snooped on another rich person and uses that information to make money from poorer people. Then the first rich person gets a court judgment to get some of the money. In shock addition, rich person’s brother then decides he wants some more money also. Should we start a go fund me page for them all?
@Cable Stayed: Newspapers (or anyone else) should not be allowed to hack someones phone calls and voicemails and make them public, regardless of who the someone is. They should be severely penalized if they do.
@Mick Hyland: of course they should not be allowed to do such things, that’s why the laws exist and why they were taken to court for running foul of them. I made absolutely no reference to the validity of the story or the laws involved. I commented on the irony that even when the mega rich offend or are offended against they get richer and that the source of the money involved is from much poorer people.
If William was wronged then he’s entitled to be compensated just like any other person. Seems the ginger whinger is just p*ssed and loves telling tales for attention. I’d say he was teachers pet in his day?
have your say