Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
LAST UPDATE | 25 May 2023
TÁNAISTE MICHEÁL MARTIN has said the approach taken by government in dealing with abortion law reforms is correct and denied the assertion from the opposition that the issue is being “kicked to touch”.
Today marks the fifth anniversary of the referendum vote to repeal the 8th Amendment, which paved the way for legalising abortion in Ireland.
People Before Profit’s Bríd Smith raised the issue of the recent review of the abortion legislation, which was committed to be carried out by government.
The review recommends 10 changes to current legislation and 60 operational changes in relation to termination services and laws.
One of the review recommendations is that the required three-day waiting period to access a termination should no longer be mandatory and should instead be at the woman’s own discretion.
Smith’s party put down a motion in the Dáil, which was debated tonight, calling for the three-day wait period to be removed and for the reforms to be carried out.
Speaking at a rally organised by People Before Profit, Orla O’Connor, the director of the National Women’s Council of Ireland (NWCI), said women from marginalised and vulnerable groups were the most adversely affected by restrictions on abortion services.
“This is mainly affecting marginalised women. It’s affecting migrant women, disabled women, Traveller women,” O’Connor said. “We want to see a situation where everyone who needs an abortion can have one in Ireland and right now that’s not the case.”
Smith told the rally that the government wanted to wait a year to consider the recommendations of the abortion review. “The lethargy that the government are displaying … means that we are going to have to get back out on the streets again,” she said.
She accused the government of using the issue as a “political football”.
In the Dáil today, Smith accused the government of parking the changes for a number of months, with the review now going to the Oireachtas Health Committee for further scrutiny.
“Dr. Mary O’Shea’s review is categoric and clear in the recommendations,” she said, highlighting one particular aspect of the review which found that pregnant women with fatal foetal abnormalities are still being forced to travel abroad due to the lack of legal clarification around the laws.
The People Before Profit TD said she was “baffled” by the delay in taking action, stating that it is clear “that this is veiled cover to the people on that side of the House not to touch this issue until we’re facing into another election”.
She said the government “does not have the courage to face up to the results” of its own review.
“You’re attempting to kick to touch and give cover to those in the Cabinet and those in the parties across the House who do not want to touch this issue, who never wanted to touch it, but were dragged kicking and screaming by a mass movement,” said Smith.
Similar issues have been raised recently by other TDs, such as Social Democrats leader Holly Cairns. She told The Journal that politicians and their views should not be playing a role in the outcome of women’s health.
The Tánaiste, in his response, said he did not agree with Smith’s assessment of the government’s position. He said the Irish people did take a fundamental decision in the referendum following a significant level of constructive engagement.
He questioned why she would be against the Oireachtas committee scrutinising and discussing the review, stating that it creates an informed process.
“We’re doing exactly the same as we did prior to the referendum. We are referring it to the Oireachtas Health Committee, not putting it on the long finger,” he said.
Operational recommendations, that do not require legislation, are being rolled out, he said.
The immediate priority is expanding the availability of abortion services in hospitals and to deal with the uneven geographic spread of services, said Martin.
“There are sensitivities in the government, like the Taoiseach saying ‘I’m uncomfortable with this’. It is not about his discomfort or anybody else’s discomfort. It’s about the health and the delivery of proper health care in this country for women and girls,” said Smith.
Martin said he genuinely believes the approach being taken is the correct one.
“This is a sensitive issue. People have different views,” he said, adding:
“I do respect the fact that this is a legislative assembly with people who will be asked in due course, potentially, to vote on or have a view on legislation relating to this area. The very least that should happen is that the report should be examined by the Oireachtas committee.”
Additional reporting by Emer Moreau
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Poor sleeping on the streets but £50,000 spent on a wedding cake.
Markle’s dress cost more than fire-proof cladding would’ve for Grenfell, but the latter was somehow “too expensive”.
@eastsmer:
So in a country as large a Britain it’s not possible to do two things at the same time?
I know it pi**es off the Republicans among us but the fact is the vast majority of British people would want the fire proof cladding AND the dress to be bought.
@P.J. Nolan:
But two things did not happen at the same time.
@eastsmer:
That’s correct and the reason for that is what this enquiry is all about. My point is your statement is whataboutery of the finest order, one decision had nothing to do with the other.
@P.J. Nolan: “whataboutery” – tell that to the relatives
@P.J. Nolan: the man was making a valid point but of course whataboutery strikes again
@eastsmer: Ridiculous comparison and in reality the Royal family cost their country a lot less than they make for it. As for the wedding I’d imagine what the media paid to cover it more than paid for the event not to mention the influx of tourists for it.
@eastsmer: and your point is?
@eastsmer: the fire happened before the wedding there is no connection between these events, the Royal family have nothing to do with fire safety last time I looked, its the failure of a number of separate organisations. Your comment is just plain stupid.
@eastsmer: Correct. but don’t upset the flagwavers. they just love to be put in their place. it gives them purpose.
Awful just awful. Think of the fear the poor people went through.
I was in Manchester the day before the wedding. Not the slightest interest in it that i could see.
A completely valid and very pertinent comparison of the inequality in the lives of the super rich and the great mass of those who must struggle every day.
Not one perpetrator of the deaths in Grenfell tower has been arrested or charged. Not one.
@PV Nevin: Thank you PV Nevin – that is the comparison that I was trying to make.
I don’t wish to downgrade their ‘royal’ family if that is what floats their boats, however surely priorities can be shifted towards the less well off.
@eastsmer: i agree completely with your comparison. Was it not the arrogance of Kensington council, the regulators, the constructiton company and the materials company towards the poor that led to the massacre?
With regard to the monarchy, I believe the relentless propaganda of the media promotes a lie that there is not mass hatred for all the rich, including the royalty.
@PV Nevin: ___ Nothing’s changed as far as the super rich and the mere mortals are concerned. Basically, people still get what they’re given, usually by people who would never dream of living in those places.
@PV Nevin: Isn’t that why they’re having an inquiry ?
@PV Nevin: the investigation is not over yet so how can anyone be arrested or charged?
Our largest fire tragedy was a single storey nightclub.. The caravans in carrickmines were pretty far from high rise..
30 apt in 16, storey ballymun tower were destroyed with no injury..
It’s standards, vigilance and care that save lives..
And they want to build high rise in Dublin.
@Cranky: Yeah let’s not build any high rise anywhere else now because one went on fire.
@Cranky: whats that got to do with it?
Eco green energy saving insulation is actively encouraged, and you can get grants for installing it ..in reality it is flamable cladding ,
Next time you pass a building being coated in foam blocks look at the ground, pick up a piece of foam (litter will be all over the site) then do your own fire test.. you don’t need a Phd in physics..
Then wonder why we have fire regulations, and fire officers..
I hope they knock the place down and trun it into a monument to all those poor souls.
have your say