Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
MINISTER FOR JUSTICE Simon Harris has recommended that the government not oppose an amendment that would make drink spiking a new offence, but added that the subject needs further consideration before the Bill becomes law.
The Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person (Spiking) (Amendment) Bill 2023 is currently at Second Stage in Seanad Éireann and was on the cabinet’s agenda today.
The elements of the proposed new offence include that the perpetrator administers, injects or otherwise causes the victim to consume a substance without their consent, and that the perpetrator knows, or is reckless as to whether the victim consents.
The Bill also stipulates that the perpetrator intends for the substance to overpower or sedate the victim for the purposes of engaging in a sexual act, causing harm, making gain, causing loss or otherwise committing an offence against them.
The Bill also provides for a defence to show that the substance was administered for a lawful reason or with a lawful excuse, or was with the other person’s express and conscious consent.
A maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment could be applied under the Bill.
A general offence of poisoning, carrying a maximum sentence of three years, is already provided for in Irish law.
In December 2021, Ministers McEntee and Harris launched an awareness campaign to combat spiking, in collaboration with the Union of Students in Ireland.
The campaign included information on how to tell if a drink has been spiked, acknowledging that most drugs used in this manner are tasteless, colourless and odourless, but that there may signs in a person’s behaviour or body language, and steps to take if a person suspects spiking has occurred.
Minister Harris told the Cabinet he recognised that spiking is a serious offence that must be dealt with robustly. However, he added, it is not clear that issues arising are necessarily legislative ones.
Significant ongoing research is taking place in a number of jurisdictions, including the UK, in relation to the prevalence and issues arising in relation to spiking. This research, as well as input from stakeholders in Ireland, will inform further actions in this area.
Given that the Bill relates to a live area of policy consideration, Harris has proposed that the Bill not be opposed at this stage. However, it will be necessary to emphasise that further consideration will be required before the Bill progresses to Committee Stage.
Harris will seek a submission from the Director of Public Prosecutions and seek advice from the Attorney General in relation to this legislation. Harris said he would also seek the input of the Garda Commissioner on the matter.
Statistics related to spiking are particularly difficult to come by, but according to Garda PULSE records there were just over 70 reported incidents in 2021 and roughly the same number in 2022 (up to 21 September).
These are likely an underrepresentation of the actual number of spiking incidents though, as many cases go unreported.
In a survey conducted earlier this year by CYD (Check Your Drink), an organisation that makes drink testing kits for the UK and Ireland, found that 19% of respondents said they had previously been spiked while 57% said they knew someone who had been a victim.
- With additional reporting from Christina Finn
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I’d imagine burglars account for 5/5 burglaries
@David Keohane: secure doors and windows account for 4 out of 5.. what I take from this is leave your doors and windows unsecured 80% less chance of being robbed.
@David Keohane: I’d say difficult upbringings account for a fair chunk of the total.
@David Keohane: of course they do but why make it easier. This is not victim blaming of that’s what your suggesting. This lads would go door to door looking for unlocked houses and cars. If locked they move on waiting for the inevitable unlocked one. The stats may suggest that if people took advise and locked up and were more vigilant. Then the total numbers should lower.
@Seaniecp: Well it is victim blaming by definition although you just draw the dots and don’t join them and nobody suggested that until you mentioned it yourself.
@Sean: ah l could just sense where this article might go. It’s where the previous article on this went. It would be great if you could leave your door open and not be burgled but unfortunately that’s not the case. Be even better if people could take advice and not be offended by it (not saying the original poster was, his post may have been for humour)
5/5 burglaries are by skum most likely already on a suspended sentence.
Wonder what percentage are out on bail?
Wow slow news day?? 1 in 5 journal articles account for actual reporting, I say!
“Unsecured doors and windows saved 1 in 5 burglary victims from having doors or windows busted as well as having their gear nicked”.
Lockdown will reduce it a wee bit….
And what was wrong with all that?
They left the feckin window wide open.
For jaysus sake lads we are blue in the face from telling ye to close the feckin windows!!! You might as well have left the front door open!! Ye might as well have invited them in for tea.
Come crying then to us.
Spilt milk.
O spilt milk
@Peter O Donoghue:
Shure you can’t be doing dat.
No, lazy degenerates account of 100% of burglaries!!!!
A lock only keeps out an honest man
There must be a percentage where the doors and windows are secured but not very secure. Well that parts obvious since they were broken into. But you get top quality security doors and windows like Rationel or Fairco make with six point locking and laminated glass and remember to lock them and you’ve narrowed your odds significantly. Just don’t lose your keys or you’ll be sleeping in the garage.
If there is one thing In the world I hate is an unlocked foot locker
Is that all?
have your say