Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Sinéad O’Carroll reports from the FIFA Women’s World Cup in Sydney
THE SPORTS MINISTER has used his visit to the Fifa Women’s World Cup to warn sporting organisations they will lose access to funding and capital grants if they do not take gender equality seriously.
Thomas Byrne, the minister for state in the Department of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media, told reporters there would be no leeway for large organisations who do not have at least 40% of their board made up of female members by the end of this year.
“The Government has obviously said there will be significant funding cuts if governing bodies don’t reach 40% of either gender on their board,” Byrne said.
Speaking in the office of the Consulate General Office in Sydney, the Meath TD added, “Organisations are making progress, we’re up to 39% – from 36% in December – of the overall boards, including with the FAI who nominated one director recently. But the FAI, rugby [the IRFU], GAA, boxing [Irish Athletic Boxing Association] are not at 40% yet. They have to be at the end of the year.”
The GAA is still only at 20% female representation on its board – a fact that would be different, the deputy noted, if there was one umbrella organisation.
The Irish Athletic Boxing Association has just 13% female representation on its board.
“They need to change… They’ve a new chairman in recently, he confirmed to me recently that it is one of their top priorities,” the minister added.
Asked if there would be any leeway given to the GAA, the IRFU or the FAI, Byrne responded: “No, no leeway whatsoever”.
“We’re looking at the moment how we do it, but what I said is there would be significant funding cuts if it’s not done by the end of the year. But… we need to keep the pressure on… if they’re not at the 40%, they will not be funded.”
Asked if the laggards understand why they are being asked to make the boards more equal, Byrne said he believes at senior level, “they all understand it”, but that “sometimes it has explained down the ranks”.
“Everybody acknowledges that they need more assistance within the ranks to allow people come up the ranks. That’s probably not happening and needs more work. When we reach the 40% at national level, we’ll see what we’ve to do to get the levels below at regional and county level there.”
‘Similar access’
Last month, Byrne announced that his department would be linking sports capital grant decisions to more equal access to facilities for male and female players.
“We have an egregious case, for example – I won’t say what county – but there is a hurling club that will not allow camogie to be played in it,” he explained. “We are not funding that. That is over. That’s the way it is.
“We’ve situations where women’s county teams are training outside their county, where maybe they have to pay to use the GAA centres of excellence and the men don’t.”
Quizzed on how such a plan would be implemented, he said, “I’m not going to tell anyone that I’m announcing it because if I start working on it through everyone, they will tell me why I can’t do it. So if I announce it in the Dáil, it’ll have to happen.
“In respect of clubs, they will have to certify when they draw down the money that they are in compliance. We will accept their self-certification. That’s in terms of clubs, local grants. Like everything in sports capital, some of that will be policed by us.
“In respect of regional grants – large scale grants – and that will include clubs who avail of regional or large-scale grants, they will have to produce a written policy on the provision of similar access. They will have to produce that policy to the department.
It’s understood the GAA is developing an open-access policy nationally as it will be considerably impacted by capital grants being linked to access where clubs do not operate as a One Club (where members are treated equally, regardless of whether they are playing under the GAA, the Camogie Association or the LGFA).
Asked if he is putting pressure on the trio to integrate, he said he is happy to allow time to the process which is currently underway.
“It’s certainly something we want to see,” he added. “And at some point, it won’t be possible to deal with three organisations. It will be too difficult… It is essential that everyone is treated similarly in that and it’s not just everybody joining one organisation but that maybe a new entity is created and they start again.”
Citing the GPA, which is currently working with female members in a work-to-rule as part of a fight for more equal treatment, he said access to facilities is a big issue for LGFA and Camogie Association members.
On the most pressing matter of the trip – Australia versus Ireland in the World Cup opener – Byrne said he would absolutely not predict the score.
“I am delighted to be here, in my case, for one game,” he said. “It’s a historic moment, it’s a historic moment for women’s sport in general as well. It’s a long team since the men’s team qualified for the World Cup. It has given a big lift to the country, there is certainly a lot of excitement in Sydney and at home as well.”
Sinéad O’Carroll and Emma Duffy are in Australia to cover Ireland’s World Cup debut for The Journal and The 42. Subscribe to The 42 here for full coverage.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Some pillock with a pocket laser I bet. Seems this is a relatively common occurrence these days. Rare for the plane to turn around though.
True. And the plane would have been at 8000 to 10000 feet high a few mins out when hit bit the laser and was cruising to the West of Ireland when it turned around and went back to Heathrow.
I’d imagine this would not be the standard laser pointer you would buy in the local but someone with a stronger toy. It would also appear the crew / company made to the decision to turn back prior to Atlantic crossing as the pilot must have been in some sort of discomfort.
A medical issue? Rather odd statement I would have thought
Getting a laser in the eye? That can cause blurred vision. I’d call that medical
Yes paddy, pilots tend to rely on their vision from time to time
Someone should develop a new anti laser filter for Aircraft Windows.
Well it depends. A lot of pens in the green are frequency doubled ir diodes so could put in glass that blocks these wavelengths. Issue is that it would block in the green. So pilots would only see in blue and red. Also your visual acuity is between green and red none in blue. So would not be ideal for pilots. Also some pointers are also in red. So blocking that as well would make pilots vision even worse. So I’m not sure just how practical it would be.
Yeah that is a good point unless they can use a polarizer to reflect the beam away or have reverse mirror or something to that degree.
A Polarizer would require knowing the initial polarization of the laser pointer which you wouldn’t. I am not sure what you mean by a reverse mirror.
It is a very difficult problem to solve. Most people don’t realise just how dangerous laser pointers and how many you might buy down in the market are very powerful and will blind. What probably saves many pilots eye sight is the divergence of these lasers after 1000 feet. But kids firing these around the playground doesn’t have this distance
Find one of these jackasses and lock him up for a few years, that might help.
The thing is, it’s not just the simple laser, in face Aircraft windscreens are the opposite than anti laser, when that thing is pointed, you cannot see F*ck all, it reflects across the hole screen, so inside and out you are blind, and if that hints your eye, it can possibly do some damage , they didn’t turn around for the crac, the pilots eyes were obviously in discomfort.
Little D.ick head if hes caught with that lazer it should be stuck up his behind.
This offence should carry a 20 year jail term
Dr Evil is my guess, the “Lazer” is a give away
Can sharks survive in the Thames?
Why would anyone want to point a laser at an aircraft taking off ? I didn’t realise you can buy military grade laser pens with a 10 mile + range on Amazon and eBay ? WTF
Ye can buy them from China for half nothing
I wonder what the pilots who flew through flak would think of this?
Pilots that flew through flak didn’t have a choice, they also didn’t have a few hundred passengers. The pilots that flew through flak would have received medical assistance if they landed just like this Virgin pilot did.
Flak was not laser strength.
If a plane is at 8k ft, and climbing, the cockpit windows wouldn’t be accessible by laser from the ground, due to the angle. Or wouldn’t the laser have to be many miles forward ? ….which makes aiming in the window at such a distance without a scope pox luck ?
It was an A340 and it was 10 kilometres out from take off so there’s no way it was 8,000ft was the flight deck was struck by the laser
Very stupid stunt, could have put lives in danger. I does raise the question though how a ground based laser could accurately target the cockpit at 10,000 ft perhaps something more sinister than a messer.
I predict an increase in the purchase of these super long range laser pens. I honestly thought you would only get a short distance from them
Jesus, imagine if something more serious happened,God help his passengers.
Why would they turn around?! If they’re going to actually be shot at surely turning around isn’t going to make that less likely
Pilots just looking for attention on this one. Grow a pair pilots
Lets hope medical technology can soon grow a pair of RETINAS to transplant into pilots that are permanently blinded by this moronic crime.
Peter industrial lasers can cut steel 12 inches thick so a hand held laser can easily cause a flash burn to the back of the eyeball from a long distance away
Why would they turn around?
A medical issue Hugh. Most likely one of the crew got an eye full of it.
Fair enough I suppose
A 20 year jail term!! Have a day off
Possible attempted murder of hundreds of people, sounds lenient to me
There should be a severe jail sentence for stuff like this.
have your say