Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE MINISTER FOR Finance Micheal McGrath has said there is a “level of exaggeration” when it comes to vacancy in Ireland but added that he believes the take up of the vacant homes tax will increase.
Last week, figures released from the Department of Finance showed that just 3,000 of 50,000 identified properties were liable for the vacant property tax.
Speaking to reporters in Dublin today, the Minister said he expects the number of properties liable for the tax to increase as this was the first year of the tax.
The tax is a self-assessment form of tax introduced in 2022 to bring more inhabitable homes back into use in light of the housing crisis.
The Minister said today that the figures released last week, collected by Revenue, represent the first time we have “hard data” on vacancy.
“I would expect that the number will continue to rise because it is the first year that we have the tax being implemented and the Revenue did use sophisticated methods to target in correspondence the people that they felt may be in scope, but they may have missed some.
“So I would expect that over time. We will have further returns being made.
“But it does point to a level of exaggeration in the conclusions to be reached about the amount of vacancy that is there. We have lots of different issues being conflated,” he said.
Exaggeration
The Minister added that last week’s figures point to “a level of exaggeration in the conclusions to be reached about the amount of vacancy that is there.”
We have lots of different issues being conflated. There is a significant amount of dereliction and those properties are not in scope for the vacant homes tax.
“They’re being dealt with by Minister O’Brien’s Department [of Housing].
“When it comes to vacancy, there are a considerable number of exemptions as well – where a property is being sold, for example, where a property is undergoing renovation works. So we now have the first set of hard data which I will be examining in the weeks ahead with the Revenue Commissioners and we’ll see what conclusions we can draw from that,” he said.
When asked by The Journal if it is his understanding that the level of vacancy is closer to 3,000 properties than 50,000 properties, he said “it depends what we define as vacancy”.
“If a property is vacant on Census night, it doesn’t mean it is necessarily vacant over a prolonged period. So this tax was very specific in terms of its scope – property that was occupied for I think less than than 30 days in the year would be in scope of the tax so there are lots of kinds of terms being loosely used.
“But this is a tax administered by the Revenue, I have full confidence in their ability to do so.
“We now have the first set of verifiable data that we can use which I will be examining over the period ahead and working with other departments to see what more we can do,” he said.
On enforcement of the tax, he said it is subject to audit by Revenue who have the “resources and powers that they need”.
“It’s a self assessed tax. And it is always possible that people are not meeting their obligations. But you know, they run the risk of attracting Revenue Commissioners onto themselves if they do that.
“So the Revenue have the powers that they need. They will be following up. They will be cross-checking the returns with the data that they already have.”
Some 48,000 houses or apartments were deemed vacant in both the 2016 and 2022 censuses, representing 2% of Ireland’s housing stock.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I don’t blame them. I had problems getting and HB1ac last week due to the first strike. But I would not blame these guys. And don’t start the FF/FG nonsense. This is the HSE. And nothing BUT the HSE. Governments come and go. But the permanent government in the HSE is to blame for decades of bad management. No party can fix this alone. There needs to be a route and branch and heads need to roll. That will require cross party support and a stomach in the public. These fat cats won’t go quietly.
@Dave Connolly: and who appoints the top positions in HSE??
@Dave Connolly: Wrong Dave. The HSE can’t just decide who gets paid what. They are forced to negotiate with one hand behind their back as, although it doesn’t attend pay negotiations, the sanction of the Department of Finance is required before ANY public service pay deal can be signed off.
@Dave Connolly: finally someone talking sense !
Although it affected me today had a procedure done was to do bloods after so specialist gets results for appointment next weekt. But fully support them so back in again on friday for bloods .
Just do the right thing. The day is coming when you (the government) will need these people who work tirelessly for all of us.
Just pay them the money. The cost of all the strikes and faffing about will be more than the rise in the long run. It’s not like they haven’t been flagging this for 20yrs.
Completely agree. Their work is essential and having upgraded their qualifications it’s short-sighted not to offer them opportunities to improve their salary without changing jobs. They’re familiar with the health system and have put in the years. I can’t see any reason to stall any longer – it’s a reasonable request.
Well good for them. They deserve it and are one group who went above and beyond during the pandemic and never got a mention.
@Mary Conneely: Well said Mary fair play to ya!
Fight for your rights, otherwise you will be trampled upon.
The HSE is a dysfunctional organisation, riddled with Managers appointed through the Peter Principle and kept in their roles by clinging and enabling bullies. This strike should never have happened, preempted resolution was the obvious answer should it have been accepted but now the ordinary people suffer again through deferred appointments.
@Terry Larkin: But your bus driver does not control the spread of viruses, bacteria and fungi all over the world,not to mention antibiotic resistance which is another calamity heading your way!!
Wage disparity happens in all work places. But fairs fair. And they should be paid accordingly.
have your say