Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Alamy Stock Photo

The problem with affordable housing in Ireland - no one agrees how much it should cost

Therefore, if everyone can agree that we want homes to become more ‘affordable’, it would likely be helpful to get some agreement on what exactly that means and how it could be achieved.

HOW MUCH SHOULD an ‘affordable’ house cost – €200,000, €300,000, €400,000?

Does it change depending on what part of the country you’re in? Common sense would, of course, suggest yes.

But if so, by how much? And perhaps most importantly – what do we mean when we say we want homes to become more affordable?

Do we want house prices to fall?

These are some of the questions which should be answered by those trying to solve Ireland’s crisis.

But too often, those tasked with improving the problem – politicians, business groups, researchers – deal in terms which are too vague when referring to making housing more ‘affordable’.

It makes it more difficult to see what problem we are actually trying to address and how it will be solved.

The Journal asked every political party for a figure that they would consider to be affordable housing and how that number was calculated.

Three – Fine Gael, Labour and Aontú - did not respond to our questions. 

Of the parties that did, each one had a different definition of affordable.

To get a sense of how malleable the word ‘affordable’ is, let’s first look at how it’s defined by two parties currently in government together – Fianna Fáil and the Green Party. 

The Greens referred The Journal to its Housing Policy document published in December 2020, shortly after the government was formed in June 2020.

This linked affordability to employment. The most recent figures for salaries at the time put average pay in Ireland, as of 2019, at €37,500. 

“[This means] that only approximately 40% of workers can afford to buy an apartment worth €150,000,” it said, based on the Central Bank’s then-lending limit of 3.5 times salary.

Linking affordability to pay would seem fairly logical – although this is based on just one worker’s income rather than two. 

Based on more recent figures which put the average Irish salary at about €45,000, the new Central Bank lending rules of 4 times income and the need for a 10% deposit, it would suggest the Greens currently consider an affordable home to be in the region of €225,000 – a number which is obviously a long way from the median house price of €333,000 nationally as of March and €446,000 in Dublin. 

Fianna Fáil in its response notably did say that there is “no single or universally applicable definition denoting housing affordability”.

Asked to provide a number on what it considered affordable, it said affordability is linked “to the specific individual circumstances of the household rather than an arbitrary set amount”.

Further asked for an example, the party referred The Journal to examples of properties delivered under the state’s First Home Scheme. As part of this initiative, the state and participating banks pay up to 30% of the cost of a newly built home, in return for a stake in the property.

This reduces the size of the mortgage the buyer has to pay, although the homeowner then does not own 100% of the equity unless they later buy back the state’s holding.

Minimum sale prices for multiple homes delivered in the Fingal County Council area under this scheme tended to be in the region of €300,000. Eligibility criteria published by the County Council also suggested that those with household incomes below €50,000 would be unlikely to afford the homes delivered under the scheme.

Moving onto the Social Democrats, the party cited homes delivered by the O’Cualann Housing Alliance, a not-for-profit Approved Housing Body.

“Three-bed affordable purchase homes in Dublin have been built by O’Cualann and sold at a price of €260,000.

“Outside of the greater Dublin area, similarly delivered affordable purchase homes are available at a cost of €230,000.”

However, this is again a different model compared to the First Home Scheme, where O’Cualann is provided with subsidies that incorporate build costs, land costs and a waiving of development levies. 

“The Social Democrats want to significantly expand this form of housing delivery as it is the most cost effective,” the party said.

It said the build costs are based on data from the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland, a building industry group which tracks the cost of developing homes, which shows how much homes can be built for.

The group has found that ‘hard costs’, ie the price of materials and build out, to be about half of the end price of a house. The rest is made up of factors such as land costs, developers’ profits and government levies and taxes.

The party then used data Approved Housing Bodies to get an estimate on how much the subsidised cost would be. 

Sinn Féin’s method of calculating affordability was similar, in that it looked mostly at hard delivery costs and planned on certain state subsidies.

The party differs from the Social Democrats in that it plans for a type of ‘leasehold’ system, where the homes would be built on state land.

Land costs would not be included in the price of development, lowering the price that homeowners would have to pay. The trade off would be that the state would retain the ‘leasehold’ – ownership of the land on which property is built.

Under this leasehold system, people would only be able to sell on their affordable homes to other affordable buyers, rather than at the normal market rate.

“Under this you’d be able to deliver homes at between €250,000 to €300,000,” Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin O’Bróin told The Journal.

That’s to ensure that households in that €50,000 to €85,000 range can buy.”

‘Households’ here can be made up of either one worker or multiple – the point if that the entire household income would be in this range.

Asked how Sinn Féin decided that this income range needed help to buy affordable housing, O’Bróin said: “As they’re the groups that are really struggling with house prices and are being locked out of the market.”

He added that the estimate is based on looking at various income and affordability indicators in the market, such as the SCSI figures and the price local authorities can deliver homes at. 

So what does all of this tell us?

It shows that, ask four different groups what an affordable house is, get four different answers – even when two of those groups are working together in government.

While some of the ‘affordable’ prices suggested by parties were relatively close, such as Sinn Féin and the Social Democrats, all had different methods on how they arrived on their numbers.

As previously covered, Ireland’s economic system is not generally set up in a way where house prices easily fall.

Therefore, if everyone can agree that we want homes to become more ‘affordable’, it would likely be helpful to get some agreement on what exactly that means and how it could be achieved.

What gets measured gets done – and not having a clear measure of what an affordable house means or should cost means that ‘affordable housing’ is a goal we are less likely to reach. 

Close
41 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute johngahan
    Favourite johngahan
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:17 AM

    Nama is probably running out of opportunities to sell-off taxpayer assets at a massive discount.

    Any building that sells at twice the price Nama sold it for within 12 months should be subject to a 75% capital gains tax, and the original sale investigated.

    149
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Burke
    Favourite David Burke
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:48 AM

    NAMA sold of it’s foreign properties first while waiting for the Irish market to recover. It needed to start selling off some of it’s Irish properties at some stage and out of tens of billions in properties there are going to be some sales which we aren’t happy with.

    The thing is though, commercial property has had a V-shaped bounce back and the recovery growth is unlikely to continue at the same pace over the next few years. Prices collapsed and then sharply recovered but are going to grow at a slower pace similar to that of economy after the recovery.

    So essentially we are talking about setting up a state owned property development company. I think there are risks and benefits around that but a reasonable discussion should take place. There aren’t enormous profits likely to be made going forward but it could be a useful piece of public policy.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John S
    Favourite John S
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 11:17 AM

    Yes because woe betide someone might see a bargain and make a few quid on something. By that logic Nama would never sell anything in case it went up in value, do you want them around forever?

    21
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ronan Mc Namara
    Favourite Ronan Mc Namara
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 11:48 AM

    This is positive news the quicker NAMA is gone the better for the country…..people said it could not work…. well it looks like it has.

    Investors are being influenced by the end of December deadline for obtaining capital gains tax relief over the next seven years.

    Recent proposals on mortgage finance announced by the Central Bank will have a direct impact on the market from now to December 2014.

    It looks like a scramble for the next 8 weeks for First Time Buyers and a cooling off in January.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Carroll
    Favourite Kevin Carroll
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:12 AM

    That’s great, selling national assets at knock down prices to foreigners only to sell them back to us again at inflated prices, while greedy millionaires get debt write offs. A f*ckin master stroke!!!

    122
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Foreigneachfear
    Favourite Foreigneachfear
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:27 AM

    Ha, I’ve heard developers are buying them back though other investors. There s a tribunal down the road for nama no doubt.

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Burke
    Favourite David Burke
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:49 AM

    You mean market prices. Which is how much they are worth.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom Red
    Favourite Tom Red
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:20 AM

    NAMA has being having a 75% OFF sale on everything it’s sold since day one…..
    With NAMA it’s not what you know,
    But who you know that counts…

    97
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frederick Constant
    Favourite Frederick Constant
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:43 AM

    Meaning what, exactly?

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute The Guru
    Favourite The Guru
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:16 AM

    €10m profit in a year flipping a property. You have to have money to make money!

    73
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frederick Constant
    Favourite Frederick Constant
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:09 AM

    That’s ambitious, but well done on delivering on your mandate. This is another big step towards national re-normalisation.

    59
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kerry Blake
    Favourite Kerry Blake
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:10 AM

    Selling off property cheaply is normalisation? Really?

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Moynihan
    Favourite John Moynihan
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:31 AM

    Why does NAMA need to close? Link it in with NABCO and FAS and rather than sell all the assets for huge discounts actually manage the properties and make money from renting commercial property and using the residential ones for social housing. Using FAS and the live register to get young people and unemployed builders back to work helping with the maintenance and in the case of some areas the completion of estates

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ed w
    Favourite ed w
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:30 AM

    Joined up thinking from a government. You’re crazy.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emily Elephant
    Favourite Emily Elephant
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:43 AM

    Because government bodies have such a great record at efficient property management and delivery of high quality accommodation?

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Coco McDee
    Favourite Coco McDee
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:41 AM

    If it all goes to plan IW will be no more in 4 days

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Murph11
    Favourite Murph11
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:25 AM

    Were we not told that all going well USC was a temporary measure? So guess Nama will be around for another bit

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute PicassoRepublic
    Favourite PicassoRepublic
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:35 AM

    Ahhh – that’s the rub. NAMA will be wound up quickly otherwise they might have to charge their pals market rates – they know they cant sell the idea of a ‘fire sale’ when the market recovers.

    Therefore NAMA will be wound up, we’ll never know the cost to the taxpayer – yes NAMA may have purchased a debt/asset for say €10M and sold it for €11M, but the original cost to the taxpayer may have been €50M when we funded NAMAs discounted purchase (we took over the banks debt).

    The USC will remain indefinitely as Joe Public must still pay business debts run up in Ireland.

    This is the ultimate achievement in the concept of money moving to the very small group at the top – not only do they not lose, but they get another bight at the cherry at a discount.

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Evan Healy
    Favourite Evan Healy
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:09 AM

    Then in another 4 years after NAMA is no more we will have NAMA 2: revenge of the bubble.

    42
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ronan Mc Namara
    Favourite Ronan Mc Namara
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 11:31 AM

    How can it be a property bubble if people are still in negative equity?

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Inntalitarian
    Favourite Inntalitarian
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:25 AM

    Well if they keep selling property to the likes of U2 at knockdown prices it’s no surprise they’re gonna wind up early.

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute tax slave
    Favourite tax slave
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:14 AM

    It will be with us for a lot longer than that to many people at the top making money

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Declan Gartlan
    Favourite Declan Gartlan
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 9:24 AM

    Same people that said Nama would never work now moaning it’s working to well also said Nama paid to much to the banks for assets shot memories

    28
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Marko Burns
    Favourite Marko Burns
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:55 AM

    NAMA could have wiped out homelessness, instead it just sold off half the capital to foreigners on the cheap and assets back to dodgy developers who already owe it money. Longest game of Monopoly in history…

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute The Irish Bull
    Favourite The Irish Bull
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:29 AM

    And then we can have the scandal.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Kirwan
    Favourite Mark Kirwan
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 11:25 AM

    Indeed. The inevitability of it all is so depressing.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute M Bowe
    Favourite M Bowe
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 11:01 AM

    Why is this being allowed to happen with these National assets.
    Green REIT came into existence 15 months ago. Hovered up €758 million of them and just announced €53 million first year rental income. That is a 7% return and with upward only rents can only get better.
    These assets should be managed and kept to add to the country’s balance sheet.
    Our own pension reserve could do with an annual 7% return very nicely.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cb2010
    Favourite Cb2010
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 10:50 AM

    NAMA did a good job given the prevailing environment of madness

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Kirwan
    Favourite Mark Kirwan
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 11:24 AM

    They are so untranparent in their dealings that there is no way we can possibly know that yet.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frances King
    Favourite Frances King
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 8:49 PM

    That’s because they own loans, not properties.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dessie Curley
    Favourite Dessie Curley
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2014, 1:32 PM

    Do they still own loads of property a road such as london etc as well as holiday homes in Southern Europe etc. never mentioned in any of their reports that are public.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute james r
    Favourite james r
    Report
    Oct 23rd 2014, 3:01 PM

    Because there’ll be nothing more to sell off at rock bottom prices

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel