Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Sam Boal

Analysis Public inquiries are a key means for validating survivor experiences

Associate professor in law James Gallen looks at how public inquiries are used as a group launch their campaign for a commission of investigation into Michael Shine.

ALLEGATIONS OF HISTORICAL abuse are often met with denial from potentially responsible organisations, which can contribute to a delay in meaningful investigation.

Where a number of allegations of abuses occur together, their volume suggests that abuse may have occurred in a widespread or systemic manner. The conventional legal system is typically best designed to address isolated criminal or civil offences and struggles, both substantively and procedurally, to respond to widespread or systemic harm.

It is in this context that a number of jurisdictions, including Ireland, have used public inquiries to address allegations of historical abuse or other widespread or systemic harms and wrongs.

A variety of inquiry models exist, from highly legalistic and formal tribunals of inquiry that operate in public, to commissions of investigation that have typically operated in private, to models of innovative justice, that draw from international human rights law or restorative justice.

Across the globe, different inquiries have gathered individual victim-survivor testimony, engaged in private and public hearings, developed systematic and thematic data about the past, identified individuals and groups responsible, and offer recommendations for further justice measures and policy changes.

Existing studies are ambivalent at best about whether inquiries can meet victim/survivor needs, and often offer risks of distress or re-traumatisation for those involved.

In Ireland, the use of public inquiries has typically adopted a more legalistic framing, guided primarily by the legal rights of accused persons, rather than the broader justice interests of victim-survivors.

As a result, victim-survivor led processes, that are informed by international best practices and guided by the risks of re-traumatisation involved in giving testimony about prior abuse, have typically not featured in Irish public life.

I have previously argued that “inquiries are best understood as raising expectations that the testimony of victim-survivors will be validated, acknowledged, and used to address historical abuses through other … justice mechanisms. If those expectations are not met, then inquiries represent a mere ritual contestation of power”.

To assess whether an inquiry can meet diverse victim-survivor needs, an inquiry design can be evaluated along a number of dimensions – the degree of survivor participation, its choice of of chair or commissioners, its legal powers to compel evidence, and whether its processes are informed by a range of disciplines including offering psychological support
and the breadth and scope of its mandate of investigation.

While at their best inquiries can offer important public acknowledgement of wrongdoing, this is often framed in social or historical terms, rather than in acknowledging duty holders and responsible actors, and the rights of victim-survivors that were breached.

Finally, inquiries are limited by design – they can offer recommendations if this forms part of their mandate, but further political will and pressure will be required for their
implementation and this will be a responsibility of government and the Minister responsible for the establishment of the inquiry.

As a result inquiries pursue ambitious goals, navigate contentious legal terrain and raise survivor expectations that their claims of wrongdoing and justice needs will be seen and vindicated.

Public inquiries are a key but risky means for validating survivor experiences and for such experiences to form the basis of other justice measures and public policy.

James Gallen is an associate professor in the School of Law and Government at Dublin City University. His first monograph Transitional Justice and the Historical Abuses of Church and State was published by Cambridge University Press in 2023 and is available free as a gold open access title.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 6 comments
Close
6 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gordon Larney
    Favourite Gordon Larney
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 3:55 PM

    Have we not also learned, that maybe we are our own worst enemy?

    79
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ronan Walsh
    Favourite Ronan Walsh
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 4:08 PM

    More power to anyone that uses Facebook, but any reason to stop picking up your phone for no reason has to be a good thing.
    An infinite amount of negativity and consumerism on a 6 inch screen can only be good for so long.

    55
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Great White Hope
    Favourite Great White Hope
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 4:16 PM

    Younger adults and kids are a problem. Peer pressure and immaturity takes away their objectively. Facebook has way too much con trol over people’s lives but adults have a right to choice.

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Craic_a_tower
    Favourite Craic_a_tower
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 4:22 PM

    @Great White Hope: adults do peer pressure quite a lot. They just don’t use the internet to do it. Never notice if somebody gets a new car in work but others do and say how they must get a new car soon. Keeping up with the Jones’ is a real thing.

    29
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gingy Opinion
    Favourite Gingy Opinion
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 4:43 PM

    I find it strange blaming a private company for the issues in society. They are not a government and have been asking to be regulated for years as they seem to know they shouldn’t be making certain decisions that impact on society.
    So where are the regulators? Where are the policies for companies to follow? The Internet has been around for the past 20 years, this isn’t a problem that just creeped up on society. It kinda feels like shifting blame is easier than actually putting controls and protection standards in place

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute OnlyHereForTheComments
    Favourite OnlyHereForTheComments
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 7:48 PM

    @Gingy Opinion: Facebook asking for regulation is a cop-out on their part, knowing full well that the wheels of regulation are far slower than the pace of change. They have known for some time about the negative impact of their platforms on society as a whole, but chose profits and growth instead. The criticism of Facebook rests in the fact that they offset to regulators what they themselves could, but choose not to do.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gingy Opinion
    Favourite Gingy Opinion
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 8:34 PM

    @OnlyHereForTheComments: But why is society asking a private company to make these decisions?
    None of us would ask a brewery to regulate for who can drive after they consume their products. Sure each brewery would come up with their own rules to suit their business objectives and people would end up consuming the products from the brewery with the most lax rules. There would be carnage.
    This is clearly a failure of elected officials to legislate. I take your point on the speed of change, but surely that is the exact same problem that a company like FB would face in terms of the policies they would need to constantly update. The difference being this is a regulators job.
    I just think we need to stop trying to shift the failings of society and governments, and take some ownership.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute L a u r a
    Favourite L a u r a
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 6:12 PM

    “They values profits over safety” they do.

    Say it in a devon accent, think lotr -

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gingy Opinion
    Favourite Gingy Opinion
    Report
    Oct 6th 2021, 4:39 PM

    I find it strange blaming a private company for the issues in society. They are not a government and have been asking to be regulated for years as they seem to know they shouldn’t be making certain decisions that impact on society.
    So where are the regulators? Where are the policies for companies to follow? The Internet has been around for the past 20 years, this isn’t a problem that just creeped up on society. It kinda feels like shifting blame is easier than actually putting controls and protection standards in place

    7
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds