Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Eamonn Farrell

Donohoe 'disappointed' over Leinster House bike shed spend, says report must be completed quickly

The public expenditure minister says he was surprised to hear about the high cost.

PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MINISTER Paschal Donohoe has said it is “vital” that a report being carried out into the €336,000 bike shed constructed at Leinster House is completed quickly. 

The new bike shed for Leinster House, which allows for storage of eighteen bikes, cost €336,051.30 in total.

The cost of construction and installation was €322,282.78.

Finance Minister Jack Chambers said last week that whoever signed off on the new bike shed must be held accountable. 

Speaking at the Department of Finance today, Donohoe said it is important that the report being carried out by the Office of Public Works (OPW) be made public. 

He said the OPW “do really important work” but added “for something like this to happen is a real disappointment”. 

When asked how disappointed he was when he heard the story, he said:

“I had a very similar reaction to everybody else. That something like that could have cost so much money.

“The Office of Public Works do really important work all over the country, and they do it well, and for this to happen under their watch, it was a real disappointment and a surprise to me. I am looking forward to seeing a report on this completed quickly,” said Donohoe. 

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
53 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pat Maher
    Favourite Pat Maher
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:49 PM

    I see speed camera vans on average about once per week. Given these stats why am I not seeing a similar frequency of drink/drug detection checkpoints?

    62
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute john
    Favourite john
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 7:09 PM

    Because catching people for drunk driving doesn’t make easy money

    56
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Clinton
    Favourite Michael Clinton
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 7:55 PM

    Not enough revenue Pat ,it costs money to man checkpoints where one trained monkey in a van will make thousands per day. They have **** all to do with safety.

    34
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frederick Burden
    Favourite Frederick Burden
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:09 PM

    Cannabis is a depressant. It slows down brain function in 5 ways.
    Reduced coordination
    Slower reaction times
    Slower information processing
    Confusion
    Changes in vision, hearing, and time and space perception
    People who smoke cannabis ‘think’ they can drive safely but the reality is that the drug has affected their judgement and view of reality.
    I remember one time travelling in a van with a friend who had smoked cannabis, he was driving and he drove straight through a roundabout, one of those raised ones with flower beds and kerbing around it.
    I remarked:
    ‘As the crow flies eh Dave’
    ‘Oh yeah Rory Gallagher, put it on man – thought I heard something back there – hope we don’t have puncture’
    I put the Doors Roadhouse Blues on instead.

    62
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Robert Emmett Birrell
    Favourite Robert Emmett Birrell
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:18 PM

    That’s an interesting synopsis, can you provide a link to any peer reviewed study to back up your claims?

    57
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Magnus Diccus
    Favourite Magnus Diccus
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:31 PM

    A time traveling van?

    20
    See 3 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Reid
    Favourite Paddy Reid
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:32 PM

    It was a story Robert…

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Digan
    Favourite David Digan
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 7:43 PM

    I bet the hours fly by in your house

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Doe
    Favourite John Doe
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 7:50 PM

    He’s all the time in the world since his mate got that time travelling van.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Karl Patchell
    Favourite Karl Patchell
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:49 PM

    Cannabis remains in the system for up to six weeks. I don’t think a person can be considered under the influence after the first couple of days…

    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cian Martin
    Favourite Cian Martin
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:27 PM

    So the main point is there are very few road accidents. Most crashes are caused by people under the influence or doing stupid things.

    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute George Salter
    Favourite George Salter
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:56 PM

    That doesn’t follow at all. Detectable levels of most drugs are well below impairment levels. It may well be that many fatalities are as a result of some sort of intoxication, but the data ( at least as presented in this article) simply doesn’t support that conclusion.

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute George Salter
    Favourite George Salter
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 10:09 PM

    @clever jake. I don’t disagree with you at all. That was my point…

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dustin Thurgood
    Favourite Dustin Thurgood
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 7:03 PM

    Don’t worry. Just keep telling people to slow down. Sure it’ll be grand like.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Bridget O'Hanlon
    Favourite Bridget O'Hanlon
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 8:10 PM

    OR – more than four out of five were caused by people NOT under the influence of drugs!

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute garb yakob
    Favourite garb yakob
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 8:25 PM

    Illegal drugs, 4 out of 5 were drunk

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Upowthat Burke
    Favourite Upowthat Burke
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 11:15 PM

    Why is cannibis illegal it contains no toxins unlike alcohal

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John smith
    Favourite John smith
    Report
    Nov 18th 2016, 6:31 PM

    Are you reading this littleone

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Adrian Connolly
    Favourite Adrian Connolly
    Report
    Nov 20th 2016, 12:59 AM

    I’ve also got a question that will get plenty of red thumbs but are these statistics for the people who caused an accident or for everyone that died. If I’m in a passenger seat of a car and high as a kite but the driver is sober and we crash and both die does that go down as fifty percent of us had taken drugs? Are alcohol related deaths measured as above the legal limit or if you had minimal alcohol in your system. I was told by a detective friend once that if any party in a car is killed in an accident and had been drinking then it is recorded as an alcohol related death. I’m just curious as to how these statistics are compiled.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Adrian Connolly
    Favourite Adrian Connolly
    Report
    Nov 20th 2016, 12:51 AM

    How hard would it be for a car manufacturer to set it up that if someone is sitting on a seat and the seat belt is not on that the car won’t start? They can already sense a person in a seat for the airbags and no when the seat belt is not closed so surely it’s not hard to make the last bit happen.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds