Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
PLANNING PERMISSION FOR an “amusement centre” with controversial slot machines in Dublin’s Dolphin’s Barn has been refused by Dublin City Council.
The planning application, which was submitted in July, was seeking to redevelop a vacant retail premises to “an amusement centre containing a mix of Amusement-With-Prize (AWP) and ‘Amusement-Only (AO) machines’”.
The applicants distinguished between the two types of machines by listing the AWP machines as “gaming machines on which prizes are paid to participants”, such as slot machines, and AO machines that “are played purely for recreational purposes”.
The plan was submitted by Farry Town Planning Ltd, on behalf of Kian McGuigan.
Green Party Councillor Michael Pidgeon launched a strong objection to the plans, telling The Journal last month that he was objecting on moral grounds as he had seen how “grim and grubby this sector can be”.
Published today, the planners report states that although amusement centres are permissible under Z4 zoning, “the site’s immediate character and proximity to residential areas raise significant concerns”.
“The subject site is located immediately adjoining a number of high density residential schemes and is in an area with a high proliferation of residential uses,” it states.
It says having an amusement centre at the proposed location “would be detrimental to the amenities of the area”.
It also says it would be contrary to Policy CCUV14 (Adult Shops, Betting Shops and Gaming Arcades) and Section 15.14.10 (Amusement Centres/Events) of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028.
These aim to limit amusement centres near residential areas and prevent excessive concentration of such facilities.
“The development would therefore, by itself and by the precedent it would set for other similar undesirable development in the vicinity, be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area,” the report concludes.
Speaking to The Journal this evening, Pidgeon said the planning refusal was “a big relief”.
“I know a lot of people in the area, including the guards and other businesses locally, were really concerned about it,” he said.
He said that while he tried to avoid making too many planning objections, “in this case, this was something that absolutely no one wanted in the area”.
“It might sound a bit moralistic, but I just think it’s not a good industry. It’s not an industry that offers anything to its customers. In order for it to make any money, the people who are using the slot machines literally just have to lose. That’s the model.”
Slot machines were previously banned in Ireland under the Gaming and Lotteries Act of 1956, which only allowed machines that were “designed for amusement” and only paid back no more than the amount at stake.
However, this was changed in 1975, when the Finance Act partially updated the laws and allowed for the licensing of gaming machines.
Slot machines are considered by some to be controversial due to their addicting nature.
A recent study from the Economic and Social Research Institute found that “slot machines and casino gambling, particularly online, were more common among people with problem gambling”.
In his objection, Pidgeon called on Dublin City Council planners to reject the application’s definition of the proposed development as an “amusement/leisure complex” and instead should be assessed more like a betting shop or casino.
There are far greater planning restrictions placed on casinos that include the signage and advertising of the premises and its proximity to residential areas and places of worship.
“It was very clear, as you read into the detail, they were talking about amusement with prize machines, which are essentially slot machines, and they’re just geared totally towards gambling addiction,” Pidgeon said.
“The main point in the planning application was to get planners to regard this as essentially a gambling institution, rather than an arcade. This is gambling not gaming, and the planners have taken that on board, so I’m happy.”
Farry Town Planning Ltd has been contacted for comment.
With reporting from Conor O’Carroll
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Good
They should have told them it was a bike shed, it would have been approved immediately.
Great decision. Now just give the area back an Ice Rink that will bring joy and entertainment to kids and adults alike 12 months of the year :) but don’t fleece the public like the one in Dundrum. Skate rinks and roller rinks are great craic :)
@S banter: Trying to run ice rinks, pool halls or any activity is not great crack. Everyone is avoiding discussing why such needed facilities are not in areas with high numbers of youth. Areas in other countries are called “ self deprived” of facilities.
Great
Cherry, Cherry, Gold Bar. So close
@Modern Irish Dad: So broke also,,,
Good decision but should be another step further and totally banned
They cannot put casinos in the ghettos, it not on.
@Ol Dirty Bstard: but they do already unfortunately. They should be banned, cause nothing but misery, addiction ,family breakups, theft , embezzlement and suicide.
Irish are addicted to gambling, no wonder so many end up short each month.
@Alex: have you been to new Orleans? You can see gambling misery everywhere
@Alex: Wait until you hear about the “Mole People” living in the tunnels and sewers around Las Vegas. It’s really not an exclusively Irish problem.
@Ol Dirty Bstard: typical deflection by the addicted.
@john murray: we should ban them , the upside would be fantastic. We’re a small country, we should be able to do it within months if the politicians actually cared. Sadly the politicians betray the public on a daily basis.
@Alex: excuse me?
@Mr “JonnieBoy” Johnson: Agree 100% . I’d also think betting tax in bookies should be raised and the revenue fed into addiction services.
@john murray: may help give insight to cab about how bookies used constantly by drug dealers runners to clean cash for them.
@Alex: I bet you haven’t a clue!
Salthill again. No thanks
3 bike sheds on the one armed bandit and you win a free e bike autographed by Eamon ryan
Not
In
My
Back
Yard
@John Moore: most decent people dont want it anywhere, its worse than drugs and does not benefit society
@John Moore: Mr I piss me welfare up against the wall over here
Surely banks could be said to be in the same category?
Jackpot.
But pokeys are a magnet for the coolest people?
Dubberlin says no! Who’s slots? Our slots!
have your say