Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Aodhán Ó Ríordáin pictured at the RDS count centre in June Alamy Stock Photo

Labour should not go into power with FF or FG, Ó Ríordáin says - but Bacik doesn't rule it out

There are mixed views in Labour about re-entering government, but former TD Aodhán Ó Ríordáin has made his opinion clear.

LAST UPDATE | 1 Dec 2024

LABOUR MEP AODHÁN Ó Ríordáin has said his party should not go into government with Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael, if they are asked to do so.

Ó Ríordáin previously served as a TD in Dublin Bay North, prior to stepping down when elected to the European Parliament in June.

Speaking to RTÉ Radio 1 today, the MEP said: “I think, particularly, Fine Gael’s treatment of the Green Party has been awful. Covertly, overtly. Totally threw them under the bus, in my opinion.”

In a recent interview with The Journal, Labour leader Ivana Bacik said her party has “huge ideological differences” with the three biggest parties – Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin.

Bacik also said she wanted to help form a “common platform” on the left, namely with the Social Democrats and the Greens (who now look set to lose most of their TDs), to go into any government formation talks together.

Speaking to reporters at the RDS count centre in Dublin today, Bacik reiterated that stance.

Our first priority is to build that common platform on the left. We’ve seen significant gains for us in Labour, we’ll be coming back with a bigger parliamentary party.

“We see significant gains across the centre left. We want to build that common platform as our absolute priority.”

Bacik, who was re-elected today in Dublin Bay South, said the first parties she will speak to are the Soc Dems and the Greens to “seek to form a common platform before we would envisage any government formation talks”.

She wouldn’t rule in, or out, going into power with Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael.

“I’ve said consistently that we are serious about delivering change, that we want to offer people and communities the change that is so badly needed,” Bacik said.

‘Not making up the numbers’ 

Labour Senator Marie Sherlock, who is battling against Gerard ‘The Monk’ Hutch for the final seat in Dublin Central, earlier said her party “will not be going in [to government] just to make up the numbers”.

Speaking to reporters in Dublin, Sherlock said: “Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have been treating this like a three-handed reel – one steps out, another steps in…

“Our leader Ivana Bacik has made it crystal clear that post-election, you have to see, obviously, where the numbers are. We’ve talked about trying to join forces with parties of shared values, and then seeing where we are then.

But we are crystal clear, we will not be going to make up the numbers.

The Journal understands that this is a sentiment shared widely within the party and that a push to enter government formation talks with Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael is being driven by outgoing Tipperary TD and former Labour leader Alan Kelly.

Members are concerned about risking another hammering from the electorate, similar to 2011, if the party went into government with either Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael.

In her interview with The Journal last month, Bacik said the best way to deliver change is by being in government.

“It’s not about one party, it’s about actually delivering change. And the best, the only way, to deliver change is through going into government,” she stated.

With reporting by Jane Matthews and Muiris Ó Cearbhaill

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
80 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony O'Brien
    Favourite Anthony O'Brien
    Report
    Feb 7th 2012, 4:14 PM

    This is slightly misleading. This engine torque imbalance issue will be secondary if not tertiary to the fact that the aircraft or crew were not qualified to land in the (visibility) conditions on the day.

    27
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute G. Smith
    Favourite G. Smith
    Report
    Feb 7th 2012, 4:33 PM

    5% torque difference is nothing, esp as it would consistent and constant. It’s nothing a crosswind wouldn’t do and certainly nothing a rudder input wouldn’t cure.

    The reality is that they simply should have diverted to avoid what actually happened.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jay funk
    Favourite Jay funk
    Report
    Feb 7th 2012, 4:41 PM

    Rubbish

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Joe McDermott
    Favourite Joe McDermott
    Report
    Feb 7th 2012, 11:14 PM

    Very true G.Smith. and neither would a 5% diff cause the plane to roll left and then hard right in that way.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds