Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
LAST UPDATE | 14 Dec 2024
SOUTH KOREA’S PARLIAMENT has voted to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol over his short-lived martial law declaration this month.
The National Assembly passed the motion in a 204-85 vote on Saturday.
Yoon’s presidential powers and duties will be suspended after the copies of a document on the impeachment are delivered to him and to the Constitutional Court.
The President said he will “never give up” and called for officials to maintain stability in government functions during what he described as a “temporary” pause of his presidency.
Yoon had previously defended his step as an act of necessary governance and vowed to “fight to the end” in the face of opposition-led efforts to remove him from office.
The court has up to 180 days to determine whether to dismiss Yoon as President or restore his powers.
If he is thrown out of office, a national election to choose his successor must be held within 60 days.
It was the second National Assembly vote on Yoon’s impeachment motion. Last Saturday, he survived an impeachment vote after most ruling party members boycotted the floor vote.
Some People Power Party legislators had since announced their intentions to vote for Yoon’s impeachment in a second vote, as public protests against the President intensified and his approval rating plummeted.
National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik said Yoon’s impeachment was an outcome driven by “the people’s ardent desire for democracy, courage and dedication”.
Hundreds of thousands of people gathered near the parliament roared in jubilation, waved banners and brandished colourful K-pop glow sticks, as a lead activist declared on stage: “We have preserved the constitutional order.”
In a central Seoul plaza, another huge crowd of people supporting Mr Yoon gathered, but they grew subdued after hearing the President had been impeached. Both rallies have largely been peaceful.
Yoon’s martial law imposition, the first of its kind in more than four decades in South Korea, lasted only six hours, but has caused massive political tumult, halted diplomatic activities and rattled financial markets.
He was forced to lift his decree after parliament unanimously voted to overturn it.
After declaring martial law, Yoon sent hundreds of troops and police officers to the parliament to try to impede its vote on the decree before they withdrew after the parliament rejected it. No major violence occurred.
Opposition parties and many experts accuse Yoon of rebellion, citing a law clause that categorises as rebellion the staging of a riot against established state authorities to undermine the constitution.
They also say that by law a president in South Korea is allowed to declare martial law only during wartime or similar emergencies and has no rights to suspend parliament’s operations even under martial law.
The impeachment motion alleged that Yoon “committed rebellion that hurts peace on the Republic of Korea by staging a series of riots”.
It said Yoon’s mobilization of military and police forces threatened the National Assembly and the public and that his martial law decree was aimed at disturbing the Constitution.
In a fiery speech on Thursday, Yoon rejected the rebellion charges, calling his martial law order an act of governance.
The conservative said he aimed to issue a warning to the main liberal opposition Democratic Party – calling it “a monster” – and “anti-state forces” that he argued has flexed its legislative muscle to impeach top officials and undermined the government’s budget bill for next year.
“I will fight to the end to prevent the forces and criminal groups that have been responsible for paralysing the country’s government and disrupting the nation’s constitutional order from threatening the future of the Republic of Korea,” Yoon said.
Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung called Yoon’s speech a “mad declaration of war” against his own people.
The Democratic Party and five other opposition parties control the 300-member unicameral parliament with a combined 192 seats, but they were eight seats shy of the two-thirds majority needed to pass Yoon’s impeachment motion and needed support from ruling party lawmakers.
The President has been banned from leaving South Korea, as law enforcement authorities are investigating whether he and others involved in the martial law declaration committed rebellion, abuse of power and other crimes.
If convicted, the leader of a rebellion plot can face the death penalty or life imprisonment.
Yoon has the presidential privilege of immunity from criminal prosecution but that does not extend to allegations of rebellion or treason.
Subsequently, Yoon could be investigated, detained, arrested or indicted over his martial law decree, but many observers doubt that authorities will forcefully detain him because of the potential for clashes with his presidential security service.
Yoon’s defence minister, police chief and the head of Seoul’s metropolitan police agency have been arrested over their roles in the martial law case. Other senior military and government officials also face investigations.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Boom-bust-boom-repeat….
Why not maintain them and take in the rents?
They weren’t supposed to perform that roll.
Better the taxpayer recoup their money.
They recently announced a plan to do exactly that, but they’ll be choosy as to what they hang onto.
Selling at a bargain basement price, property sharks to make a killing from the new property boom.
I know they were set up to recoup the money that was given during the bail outs of the banks but when NAMA ssems to be pretty profitable why don’t they hold onto these properties long term and NAMA can move over to the pensions reserve fund when the bail out money is returned providing income for the fund in perpetuity. After all it was raided for the ball out too and every so often they start banging on about a pensions timebomb so maybe this is the solution.
Carrickmines is busiest retail space in Dublin I would swear. It’s always busy every day of the week.
N.A.M.A. …. They have as much respect for the law as the Israeli have for the U.N .
Still they’re all together in a nice little nest ….
Is there anything not in Nama?
It seems to be the equivalent of a Govt 1 Euro shop at this stage.
“Four Lakes Retail Park in Carlow, a site with a high vacancy rate… but there is a drive-thru Supermacs at the entrance.”
Somebody fetch me my chequebook, they have a Supermacs!
The best thing about that place is that due to all the vacancies you often have the whole car park to yourself to enjoy your Supermacs in peace.
Why are these properties not being offered to the tenants first? They are being sold at a knock down price yet the tenants are expected to pay boom upward only rents. Then we wonder why things are so expensive, wonder why small/medium bushiness go bust? These properties would realise more for the state if they were offered this way. The same with all the housing in NAMA. I don’t think rents would be as high as they are and another property bubble forming if housing was also offered this way to the general public.
Ok,
How can we have competition in property markets if 5 retail parks in various locations are to be sold to 1 buyer?
WHAT ABOUT THE WATER CHARGES FOR O A P
have your say