We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
GLYCEROL IN SLUSHIES can make children sick, and should not be consumed until children are at least eight years old, according to a new study by UCD.
The study reviewed 21 children who presented to medical centres across the UK and Ireland from 2009 through 2024 after consuming slushies.
Of the 21 children, a majority – 93% – of them became unwell within 60 minutes of slush ice drink consumption. None of them had any relevant previous conditions.
The researchers found that that the glycerol in slush drinks can cause ‘glycerol intoxication syndrome’ in young children.
“This illness has only rarely been described before in the medical literature and never in association with slush ice drinks,” said Professor Ellen Crushell, a metabolic paediatrician at Temple Street children’s hospital and professor at the UCD School of Medicine.
The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) last year, issued advice to parents to limit young childrens’ consumption of slush ice drinks that contain glycerol, due to potentially negative side-effects – including headaches, nausea, and vomiting.
Glycerol is an EU-approved additive that is used to keep the sugar content of drinks low, and gives iced drinks a slushy consistency. While it is not usually harmful, there are concerns about its effect on young children.
The FSAI has advised that children under the age of four should not consume drinks containing glycerol, and that consumption by older kids and adults should be kept to no more than one a day.
However, Crushnell said children should be at least eight years old before consuming slushies.
She added that greater transparency was needed on the amount of glycerol used in the drinks.
The HSE said parents should bear in mind that slush drinks have no health value for kids anyway.
Dr Abigail Collins, National Clinical Lead for the HSE’s Child Health Public Health Programme said: “It should also be noted that all slush ice drinks, whether containing sugar or glycerol, convey no health benefits, and are not part of a healthy diet for children of any age.”
Jennifer Murnane O’Connor, the junior minister responsible for public health, said she has asked her department and the FSAI to review the study’s findings.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Nearly there now lads.
Keep doing the right things for a few more weeks and we’re home and hosed , everyone who made it through this pandemic needs to give themselves a pat on the back for making it this far .
@Damo Casey: everyone that hasn’t died in the last 14 months deserves a pat on the back from themselves? Weird.
Also it’s a lot more than a few weeks until it’s over unfortunately.
Open the brothels now!!
@TheBurner: pair of liathroidi’s on yeah down to your ankles
@TheBurner: Ah, the good old days of the 90′s :)
@TheBurner:
You cant open things that were never closed.
Don’t forget to disolve them ‘temporary’ laws lads.
@Jason Walsh: Like all things temporary in this country…..USC too, temporary has a terrible habit of becoming permanent.
If that’s the case then we don’t need the covid emergency powers extended till November, at best they should remain in place till the end of July and be reviewed on a monthly basis from then. We will only be at the end of this covid situation…
@Michael Healy: and have to pass vote after vote to keep them going ? Nonsense . No one says they have to use them . They have them of they need them
@Seán O’Sullivan: Yes but remember when the USC was temporary and only there till things got better and guess what it never went away. I’d prefer them doing something and making sure these rules are voted in each month based on where we are rather than a get out of jail free card for the hse to use when the usual winter nearly on the brink situation kicks off like it’s done for the last 20 years and they have the covid powers as a great reason to cover up the poor management….
1…2…3….SF PBP moaning
@Brian Lyons: even with all the hope and positivity your headspace is occupied by those you don’t like. Sad.
@Brian Lyons: after you.
@Brian Lyons: Sad.
@Brian Lyons: just listened to mary Lou on 6 one, not one moan out of her.
@Brian Lyons: what does PBP and SF have to do with people wondering why some of these rules don’t make sense. I don’t vote for either parties but I think some of the rules with no data or science to back it up is just a head scratcher and doesn’t seem to make sense…but hey if you wanna let political parties live in the head rent free, more fool you
Open the hubs
@Quiet Goer: love a good hub
@Vlad Eire: Can’t best a frosty hint in the hub with the hads and a good hatch.
Seems to be some genuine optimism all around. Bring it on.
In the mean Mícheál you have vaccinated the 60-69 age group with the most feared vaccine which is only 60% proof and they have another 12 weeks to wait for the 2nd part
@trebloc01: what medical background do you have ?
@trebloc01: Vaccination as many people with 1 vaccine is more of a priority than getting 2 to a small amount of people. 1 offers 70-80%+ protection, which 2 gives you 90%+. Makes more sense to get 1 to lots of people as that will help get heard immunity faster
@Seán O’Sullivan: Maybe you should read the data on A Z and compare it with the others. Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen.Its easy to inform yourself on these matters especially if you are going to make the serious decision of getting a vaccine.
So, just a few more weeks (months, really) to flatten the curve.
So when all the bars & restaurants open July 5th us there a time limit on how long you can stay there…?
@Hear me now: That may be scrapped depending on the numbers remaining stable. That’s my understanding anyway.
@Cian Nolan: thanks Cian…fingers toes & feck I’m even crossing my eyes at this stage there’s no time restrictions.
@Hear me now: 3 days
Hahahaha
More tool you if you believe this. Flip flop flip flop
Good sensible plan. Baby steps the way to go.
What date are the nightclubs opening?
Really miss a camp night out in The George with Whitney and Madonna!
More waffle from the government let’s get real we’re all doomed
Good to hear Live Music on the way back
Any update on the PUP? Will it be extended, reduced, etc.? Because there’s still quite a few unable to return to work
@Stop the Lights: Think that’s going to be next week.
So polling stations can open from July? Election pencilled in before the October Budget.
Can’t wait to sink a pint of guinness.mothers milk
@reginald: make sure the first few are gone through the tap, don’t want that to end in disaster.
Another annoying question ..the non essential travel from the 17th July ..only if your vacinated (fully) ?
@Hear me now: No. A negative PCR test will fit the Green Pass as well.
@Seamus Gallen: thanks Seamus
@Hear me now: or if you have had Covid.
The carrot on the stick
We all know what is within your grasp, Leo’s ball bag
Calling someone a clown is toxic
@Bernard Mc Donnell: hahaha so is saying fo ol
@Derek Anderson: And idi,ot:)
The next 2 weeks are critical
It’s not like Spanish Flu 100 years ago didn’t tell us re opening would happen in June!
@Ciaran McCann: In before Gary reminds you that it isn’t a flu, it is in fact, a very dangerous SARS virus, just another 2 weeks, numbers, look at the UK, etc., etc.
have your say