Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Newgrange at dusk Alamy Stock Photo

UCD research ‘overturns’ long-held belief that Newgrange was burial site for only the elite

The researcher say their findings ‘deconstructs the myth that only important individuals were socially active’.

NEW RESEARCH LED by UCD has “overturned” the centuries-old belief that the prehistoric Newgrange monument in Co Meath was a burial site for the elite class.

Writing in The Conversation, the report’s authors said that the new research reveals a “complex pattern of small, mobile groups who moved frequently with their animals and gathered seasonally”.

They say this “deconstructs the myth that only important individuals were socially active”.

Neil Carlin, an archaeology lecturer in UCD, and Jessica Smyth, Associate Professor in Archaeology at UCD, are among the report’s authors – the full report can be read here.

The report said the evidence does not “support the existence of hereditary power or A dynasty” and that any shared ancestry can be explained as “resulting from preferential choice of partners within a dispersed community”.

It added: “In constructing monuments collectively, people were also constructing kin relations.”

This “kin network” among these small and mobile groups – achieved through communal feasting, ceremonies, and work – extended over hundreds of kilometres and many generations and “transcended biological kin”.

It noted that any genetic clustering shown from passage tombs is “likely to have emerged from kin work, rather than a purely hereditary network”.

Most of the individuals genetically sequenced from these monuments were more closely biologically related to each other than to the wider Irish population at the time, thus forming a genetic cluster.

But genetic clustering from passage tombs is likely to have emerged from extended kin groups created and maintained through their communal acts.

“People may have preferentially chosen their reproductive partners from within this extended community of passage-tomb users, some of whom were genetically distantly related,” stated the report.

Only a few examples of close family links occur in smaller and earlier tombs.

But within passage tombs like Newgrange, most biological relationships tend to have been distant, such as second cousins or a great-great-great grandparent.

The report’s authors said this “tells us that burial was not strongly determined by biological relatedness”.

It concluded that the selection of bones for deposition within passage tombs in Neolithic Ireland “does not seem strongly influenced by biological relatedness”

Rather, other “facets of identity, kinship, ability, role, cosmology and value influence these decisions”.

“The mapping of distantly related individuals interred within passage tombs far apart in time and place shows the shift towards more closely connected cultural and religious networks,” said the report.

“These likely comprised dispersed groups who were increasingly mobile across a wide swathe of Ireland in the later half of the Neolithic.

“The evidence certainly does not support the existence of hereditary power (a ‘dynasty’) in these populations.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
17 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds