Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File image of a blood test. Non-invasive prenatal testing can be conducted at 10 weeks. Alamy Stock Photo

Maternity care chief warns wealthy families have greater access to the best prenatal screening

The HSE said work is underway to propose equitable access for all pregnant women – if resources allow.

PEOPLE ON HIGHER incomes have greater access to the best prenatal screening, the HSE maternity care chief warned in 2023. 

Non-invasive prenatal testing is an accurate form of screening for chromosomal conditions such as Edwards Syndrome and Patau’s Syndrome, fatal foetal anomalies likely to result in death in utero or in infancy.

The tests are only available privately, except in a few exceptional cases, and cost hundreds of euro.

The HSE told The Journal in recent days that it is now developing a proposal to incorporate this testing into routine maternity care in Ireland, with a view to providing “equitable access…for all pregnant women”.

Dr Cliona Murphy, then-clinical director of the National Women and Infants Health Programme, raised inequitable access to this testing with the National Screening Advisory Council in January 2023. The correspondence was released to The Journal under freedom of information.

Murphy told the committee, which advises the Minister for Health on population-based screening programmes, that it could suggest that the HSE establish a national programme, based in the public maternity system.

However, two years later, this testing remains available only to expecting parents who can pay, with some private health insurance plans covering a portion of the bill.

The HSE proposal to widen access to this care is being drafted by the National Women and Infants Health Programme and by a group implementing the recommendations of the O’Shea and Regan reviews of abortion services.

Both reviews called for a national programme for prenatal testing for common chromosomal conditions, with the Regan review criticising “unregulated, inequitable access to commercially provided screening tests…without the protection of the governance or quality assurance that would come from a structured screening programme”.

The HSE said a final decision on whether to proceed with such a programme will depend on “national priorities” and the availability of resources, as well as “broader health policy”.

The Department of Health said that the National Screening Advisory Council decided to “defer consideration” of proposals it received in 2021 and 2022 to introduce first trimester prenatal screening for chromosomal and congenital conditions. This deferment followed “careful consideration” of the National Women and Infant Health Programme’s 2023 advice, it said.

The Department said the deferment was also based on consideration of “associated ethical issues related to screening for these conditions”. It declined to specify what these ethical issues were.

‘Single best screening test’

Non-invasive prenatal testing is deemed the “single best screening test” for chromosomal conditions in the HSE’s 2023 clinical guidelines on foetal anatomy ultrasound.

It comprises a blood test accompanied by an ultrasound scan, and is sold under brand names including Harmony and Panorama.

During pregnancy, some foetal DNA passes into the mother’s bloodstream, and this can be used to screen for genetic conditions, such as Down Syndrome.

Recent research by University College Cork found these tests currently cost between €380 and €650 at private obstetric clinics and at four of the 19 maternity hospitals. Ultrasound clinics and some GPs also offer the tests.

The researchers warned that access to the tests and to information on the tests was “inequitable” and said a national screening programme would improve reproductive autonomy.

In her correspondence with the National Screening Advisory Council (NSAC), Dr Cliona Murphy described provision of non-invasive prenatal testing in Ireland as “unstructured and random”.

She said the tests were “more likely” to be accessed by parents who were well educated, as “prior knowledge” was required.

Given that access is “contingent on ability to pay”, the tests are “more accessible [to] those on higher incomes”, she added in a letter to NSAC.

A national screening programme would ensure information on screening was standardised and people who received high-risk results could access “high quality diagnostics”, Murphy said. She added that such a programme would be on an opt-in basis, meaning women would not have to avail of it if they chose otherwise.

Earlier testing

Non-invasive prenatal testing can be performed early in pregnancy, usually from nine or 10 weeks. By contrast, the foetal anomaly ultrasound scan provided to all patients through the public system in Ireland is performed at 20-22 weeks. Some women who learn after 20-22 weeks of a fatal foetal anomaly could have discovered this earlier had they had access to non-invasive prenatal screening at 10 weeks.

The introduction of a national prenatal screening programme in the Netherlands, with an uptake rate of approximately 46%, has led to earlier diagnosis of major foetal anomalies with a significant reduction in late termination of pregnancy, the UCC researchers said.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends offering prenatal screening to all pregnant people regardless of maternal age or risk.

The NSAC requested advice from the National Women and Infants Health Programme on prenatal testing in 2022.

The NSAC received calls for the introduction of a population-based screening programme for chromosomal conditions in 2021 and 2022.

The Department of Health said that another call for submissions to the NSAC will be launched later this year.

“Should new evidence have emerged” on screening for chromosomal conditions, “NSAC would be open to receiving an updated proposal”, the Department said.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
27 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Quill
    Favourite John Quill
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 12:33 PM

    Grim Times

    196
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute SFAnkleTapper
    Favourite SFAnkleTapper
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 12:38 PM

    @John Quill: worse to come unfortunately.

    52
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Bitcoin Buddy
    Favourite Bitcoin Buddy
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 3:26 PM

    @SFAnkleTapper: where did you get your crystal ball?

    14
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Daniel Kelly
    Favourite Daniel Kelly
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 3:38 PM

    @Bitcoin Buddy: Sure you’re into healing crystals, bitcoin pyramid schemes and all sorts of superstition!

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Honeybee
    Favourite Honeybee
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 12:46 PM

    This advice is conflicting, on the one hand family can attend but on the other a maximum of 10 can be in the church or cemetery for burial. The one thing any family member would want is to attend the funeral of their nearest and dearest,there is no reason at present to prevent this or restrict this provided social distancing is implemented. All family members should be able to attend.

    100
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute hellsbells
    Favourite hellsbells
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 12:51 PM

    @Honeybee: I’ve a huge family, we’d have to draw straws if the 10 attendees rule applied.

    92
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Honeybee
    Favourite Honeybee
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 12:55 PM

    @hellsbells: Imagine the emotional impact of being told that not only do you not get to see a family member before their death but that you cannot even attend the funeral. This could have severe repercussions on people for the rest of their lives including relationships within a family.

    126
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute bmul
    Favourite bmul
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 12:57 PM

    @hellsbells: better than attending multiple funerals

    81
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Clau Emmett
    Favourite Clau Emmett
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 3:34 PM

    @Honeybee: I absolutely agree with you, but you have to look around at what other countries are now doing. For example in Spain funerals are banned no more than 3 people I believe to attend including the ones who have to carry the coffins in full protective gear. In Italy it’s been worse even. So yes, it’s is by far upsetting but it is to ensure there is less infections and less deaths overall.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dara O'Brien
    Favourite Dara O'Brien
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 1:12 PM

    Harsh as it may seem, there is obviously a real worry that by breaking these guidelines to go to a funeral, you could be the cause of many more funerals.

    I’m fully certain that all who can’t attend a funeral will be forgiven and there will be ample opportunities to pay respects once this has all passed.

    81
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Derek
    Favourite Derek
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 1:24 PM

    @Dara O’Brien: exactly, those attending who are not living with the deceased should simply not be interacting, especially if different households must travel to the funeral. Sorry to say this but this virus doesn’t care or disappear for the day for us to follow social norms. Those who attend have to heavily consider the risk they are putting on their other family members and elderly. Sorrowful times, but alas we have not even reached the peak yet with many more deaths expected over the coming months. There will be time to grief and pay respects at a later stage when we are confident this grave risk has past.

    41
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Corrigan
    Favourite David Corrigan
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:13 PM

    @Derek: I went to a funeral yesterday and there was at least 5 meters between everyone there. Some folk stood at their own loved ones graves well away from the funeral. The locals lined the street on both sides but everyone stayed 5m apart also.
    The majority of us drove to the village, stayed away from each other during the funeral and then drove straight home.

    29
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fiona Fitzgerald
    Favourite Fiona Fitzgerald
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 3:37 PM

    @David Corrigan: I’m sorry for your loss. It’s hard to properly mourn when you can’t interact with everyone else who knew the deceased.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Honeybee
    Favourite Honeybee
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 4:44 PM

    @David Corrigan: There David,you have shown how it is possible to attend a funeral while not exposing anyone to unnecessary risk. I am sorry for the loss of the poor individual you grieve, these are strange and difficult times in which we find ourselves.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Bitcoin Buddy
    Favourite Bitcoin Buddy
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 3:28 PM

    So there can be 100 people in a supermarket but only 10 in a church or graveyard? Makes sense.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute john phelan
    Favourite john phelan
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 1:04 PM

    I really dont how it will work anyway, as a loved one is buried, all you want to do is be close to your family.

    24
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute G Row
    Favourite G Row
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:02 PM

    Sad times for funeral chasing politicians.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jo H
    Favourite Jo H
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:05 PM

    @G Row: Not the time or the place for such comments, IMO

    24
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute G Row
    Favourite G Row
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:10 PM

    @Jo H: That’s your opinion, are you a fan?

    2
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Oliver Mahon
    Favourite Oliver Mahon
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:18 PM

    @G Row: too sad that you have no humanity

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute G Row
    Favourite G Row
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:25 PM

    @Oliver Mahon: I have family members on the front line, real front line, nurses on Covid wards. I do not trust our so called leaders with their lives.
    You obviously do, too sad that you are that gullible.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gerry Fogarty
    Favourite Gerry Fogarty
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:28 PM

    Never ceases to amaze me that every discussion on this site ends up with an exchange of vile comments and insults .

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute D'oh
    Favourite D'oh
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:55 PM

    @Gerry Fogarty: Are you new here?

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Roger Dawson
    Favourite Roger Dawson
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:48 PM

    Politicians will be delighted if this Policy remains even after the crisis is over.
    Less work after all that’s most of what they do.
    Will we miss the Gombeens at Funeral’s

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gerry Fogarty
    Favourite Gerry Fogarty
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:27 PM

    Never ceases to amaze me that every discussion on this site ends up with N exchange of vile comments and insults

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seanboy
    Favourite Seanboy
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 1:28 PM

    I read something very similar to this in a WhatsApp message 3 or 4 weeks ago the journal debunked it as fake news Ironic!

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Trish O'Leary-Dunne
    Favourite Trish O'Leary-Dunne
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 1:32 PM

    @Seanboy: everything was different 3 or 4 weeks ago and these restrictions were not in place then.4 weeks ago you could still go to the pub

    43
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian Breathnach
    Favourite Ian Breathnach
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 1:47 PM

    @Seanboy: It was fake news back then. Clearly, things have changed.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Nolan
    Favourite David Nolan
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 6:16 PM

    10 family members at a loved 1s funeral and the likes of Tesco’s and Aldi etc have 40 / 50/ 60 people in the same area…. i feel fit anyone loosing a family member or close friend at this time

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute G Row
    Favourite G Row
    Report
    Mar 31st 2020, 2:08 PM

    That’s your opinion, you a fan?

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds