Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The 'Likely Scam' label is being attached to messages from trusted companies. Commission for Communications Regulation

Explainer: What's going wrong with ComReg’s new scam-text warning system?

A glitch in Comreg’s new system for scam texts is causing legitimates messages to be labelled as scam.

A NEW SYSTEM to help phone users identify scam texts has caused some important messages from organisations such as hospitals and banks to be marked as ‘Likely Scam’.

The Communications Regulator rolled out the system last Thursday to prevent people opening or responding to spam messages which attempt to trick people into clicking unsafe links or sending money.

However, issues with the system are causing people to avoid messages from some trusted companies and agencies, including VHI, the CAO, AIB and several hospitals, potentially causing customers to miss important information.

Companies had to add themselves to a register to send messages to customers without being labelled as ‘Likely Scam’, which 8,000 companies have already done, however, a glitch in the system is causing messages from registered companies to be marked as ‘scam’.

Now, instead of the sender information showing up as the company name, it will appear as ‘Likely Scam’ so customers cannot tell who they have received a text from.

What is the new scam text system?

The new ComReg system labels texts from unregistered businesses as ‘Likely Scam’ to crackdown on the widespread issue of fraudulent messages, and protect people from losing money or revealing sensitive information to scam artists masquerading as trusted businesses.

Europe Economics estimates over €300 million is lost each year by Irish consumers and businesses targeted by scam calls and texts.

The system labels messages from untrusted senders as ”Likely Scam”, and will completely block messages with this label from 3 October this year. 

Companies must register themselves with the communications regulator’s new scheme if they want to send texts to customers without them being flagged as a scam.

Application-to-Person (A2P) SMS messages often include a SMS Sender ID to indicate who sent the message. It’s usually the name of the company or organisation.

Now ComReg must be made aware of the ID, otherwise texts sent will be flagged to recipients as ‘Likely Scam’.

If someone receives a message that says ‘Likely Scam’, this may be because the sender hasn’t yet registered their ID, which companies must do before October to prevent being blocked.

What are the issues with the system?

The system is accidentally labelling messages from some legitimate businesses as ‘Likely Scam’.

Speaking to RTE’s News At One programme, Comreg’s director of market frameworks, George Merrigan, said the issue is caused by ComReg’s technical partners. 

“In terms of Comreg’s own systems, all are working exactly to expectation,” he said.

“The issues we’re experiencing are that some industry players are having some technical issues and we are working with them to resolve those issues as quickly as possible.”

What are ComReg doing about it?

ComReg has apologised for any inconvenience and said they are “working to resolve these issues as quickly as possible”.

“ComReg is aware that some already registered Sender IDs are being modified to “Likely Scam” and continues to work with industry parties to resolve any technical issues they are experiencing”, they told The Journal.

Tom Butler, Public Affairs Manager for ComReg, could not say whether ComReg will disable the ‘Likely Scam’ programme until the issues are fixed.

ComReg are continuing to register all new SenderID applications received.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 24 comments
Close
24 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds