Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRELAND’S NEW SYSTEM of car registration plates kicks in from tomorrow – with a new bi-annual system which denotes whether a car was bought in the first or second half of the year.
In theory, the new plates – introduced as part of Budget 2013 – are being introduced in an effort to offer some stability to the motor sales industry, which traditionally sees the bulk of its sales in the first few months of the year.
This is because many motorists perceive a car to have been on the road for the full year of its first registration – and therefore will judge some cars to be older than they actually are.
For example, a motorist going shopping for a new car from tomorrow might perceive a car with a 12-D registration plate to be a year old – even if it had only been registered last week.
The new plate is designed to make it more evident that a car had been first taken to the roads in the second half of a year, and potentially help a car dealer balance their sales more evenly throughout the year.
Some, however, had called for a change in the registration plates before 2013 simply because they had wanted to avoid having the supposedly unlucky number ’13′ on their registration plates.
The calls for a new system had been led by independent TD Michael Healy-Rae, who believed the struggling industry could be dealt a harsh blow by any refusal of motorists to buy a generation of cars bearing the supposedly unlucky 13.
The photo above shows what the new plates will look like. By and large, they’re identical to the ones we already have, except for one adjustment: cars bought in the first half of 2013 will carry the ‘year’ 131, as you see in the photo above, and those bought from July onward will carry 132.
This isn’t just for 2013, incidentally: this will be the same for every year from now on.
(Thanks to the team at Keary’s Renault in Cork for the photo above. Here’s Amy Quilter and her Corkonian colleagues, as they prepare for the new system. Photo: Clare Keogh.)
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
3bn texts in a 3 month period in Ireland, 12 bn in a year..
a 2 cent text tax would have raised ?240 million, All of the ?26m needed to protect the carers respite grant & child benefit. If my sums are right.
(0.02 x 12,000,000,000
= 240,000,000
This would be a creative and some what optional tax that does not effect peoples ability to survive.
Correct but since the boys in the Dail have free phones paid by, as with everything else, the taxpayer, then we would be worse off and they would once again be untouched.
Why should mobile users pay for the carer’s allowance. A couple of percent tax increase for high earners would easily make up the millions the government took from them.
isn’t there already VAT on text messaging? so double taxation is your answer?
@Gamma, I’m just trying to think of less painful ways to help our country…
Do you have any better idea’s? We’d love to hear them.
Your response is what is wrong with us, all moan no solution.
You can call it what you want but it doesn’t take food out of peoples mouths.. and that’s the point.
tooooo much calculations, tooooo much percentages, all we care for is to bring down all this mobile nd landline broadband services nd make it moooore effective in using, it’s tooo expensive here in Ireland compare to other EU country
Does that include iMessages which are free?
Presumably this includes FREE SMS with Vodafone to Any Network for Life (I’m assuming 3, O2, Meteor, 48, Eircon etc. all do similar deals for RTG Customers?)?
Top of my head I sent 1152 in October. Think highest was 2,170 in November 2011. Averages out at Circa 1,300 ish during/across the year.
have your say