Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
A NEW BILL, legislating for the rights of grandparents to apply for access to children will introduce a definition of the term in child guardianship law.
Last week the Rights of Grandparents Bill 2013 was moved in the Dáil to its first stage by Fine Gael TD Derek Keating. The bill will change the current obligation on grandparents to have to apply to court for leave before applying for access to their grandchildren in circumstances where access is denied.
The bill is an unusual piece of legislation as Keating said our laws do not generally address such personal issues as familial bonds. He said the bill moves towards ensuring that grandparents have access to their grandchildren, where appropriate, and “facilitates the continued development of a relationship or a bond between the two, which should be encouraged whenever possible”.
To achieve the right, the bill seeks to amend the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 by inserting a definitions for grandparents, as terms for “mother”, “father” and “parent” are already included. The definition reads:
A grandparent in relation to a child means a grandparent whether of whole/half blood or by affinity and includes the spouse of such person, a parent of a child’s adopted parent and an adoptive parent of a child’s parent.
Under the proposed legislation, the court will have regard to all circumstances including the particular applicant’s connection with a child, the risk of the applicant disrupting the child’s life to that extent that they would be harmed by it, the wishes of the parents and fundamentally the wishes of the child.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Meanwhile
An unknown shelf company buys a company in a tax haven somewhere to minimise paying tax in their own country.
Yes, and said company’s latest project is to launch an A to Z Guide on how to ship $10 bn annual profits tax free out of various western jurisdictions in a captainless boat to a Caribbean Island tax haven.
Along with the rest of the multinationals.
Only way for Apple is down, unless they start innovating, which is unlikely to happen since the end of the Steve Jobs era.
Maybe so
Plenty of shilling in the bank to whittle away in the meantime.
http://www.businessinsider.com/global-cash-reserves-companies-nations-2014-4?IR=T
Moderate Michael, Apple has been written off so many times and has always bounced back. It would be unwise to write them off based on stock market valuations. So it’s only the second most valuable company in the world ? And this means they’re on the way down? I would have thought that it was an indicator of success.
Michael, living in the cloud, no pun intended, if you think Apple is going down or even if it cares about Google.
Google makes basically no product, Apple is a product based company. If it only makes 99% of a gazillion instead of the full gazillion the 20 year old stockmarket jockeys write it off again.
In reality they force the price down, buy in at the new lower price then sell again a month later ehen the shares have recovered. Oldest trick in the business
Alphabet “… made a profit of $4.9 billion (€4.48 billion) in the last quarter of 2015, and saw its value rise to $568 billion (€520 billion) in after-hours trading, beating Apple’s value of $535 billion (€490 billion).”
Apple made a profit of $11.1 billion in the last quarter of 2015 and has more cash in the bank than the GDP of many European nations, over $200 billion. I wouldn’t worry too much about stock market valuations because they are so fickle. Anyone who writes Apple of is stupid. Largest or second largest company in the world? Is it really important?
Whoever clicks on those adds?
As someone who works in the industry (and it is an entire industry), I can’t tell you that a LOT of people click on those ads. In search, between 30-50 percent click on them depending on the search term (older, less tech savvy people are more likely).
Increasingly, more and more clicks are being driven from the display network as Google provides better ways to filter out the crap.
Those remarketing ads that “follow” you around, it would shock you how well they work. When they were first released, I refused to use them, believing everyone was like me, creeped out and would simply install an ad blocker. I was wrong. Very wrong.
Now, advertisers even have access to show you those remarketing ads based on your email address. This is still in beta but it works even better than regular remarketing lists. If I have your email address and it’s a Google email address, I can tell Google to show you my ads on the display network. Even if you’ve never had any interaction with me.
Google/Alphabet is going to become even more valuable this year. It’s advertising and analytics products are incredible. Whether you agree with advertising or not, they’re going from strength to strength. It would scare the crap out of you how much data about you that advertisers have. In Ireland, it’s pretty easy to build up a database of the entire population. Statistically, you’re likely to be in one of mine.
The rise in use of ad blockers (which on most of them, Google ads are whitelisted by default) is more than offset by the rise in new people using the Internet.
Google also have an entire team dedicated to making sure ads are not intrusive. I wouldn’t be shorting their stock any time soon.
Knock it if you will, just remember Googles stock is part of millions of people’s pension funds.
This is the best clickbait headline I have read this year.
i just had to click to click. Fair play.
have your say