Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Irish law currently gives visiting sex offenders seven days to register their presence with Gardaí - while British law only offers three days. Wanderley Massafelli/Photocall Ireland

TD claims Ireland is becoming a 'safe haven for convicted sex offenders'

Denis Naughten takes issue with laws that don’t require sex offenders to register with Gardaí immediately upon arrival here.

A TD HAS CLAIMED that Ireland is becoming “a safe haven for convicted sex offenders” because of a failure to tighten laws requiring visiting offenders to report to Gardaí.

Former Fine Gael TD Denis Naughten says the previous government’s pledge to close a loophole which gives convicted sex offenders up to seven days to register with Gardaí after they first arrive in Ireland.

In 2009 the then-Minister for Justice, Dermot Ahern, said he intended to reduce this period to three days, bringing Ireland into harmony with the UK – but legislation was never introduced and the seven-day period remains in place.

In March of last year the current minister Alan Shatter said he expected to seek government approval for a change in the laws ‘in the coming months’ – but last week said he had not yet done so and that government approval to draft the necessary legislation would be sought “shortly”.

“At present, a convicted high risk paedophile can visit Ireland from Britain or Northern Ireland and roam freely throughout the country without registering with the Gardai for up to a week,” Naughten explained.

“In theory, the same notification procedure applied to Irish sex offenders applies for those convicted of serious sexual offences in other jurisdictions, but it is reliant on the offender voluntarily reporting to the Gardaí within seven days of arrival.”

Naughten has himself published legislation which would modernise the monitoring of sex offenders, and would allow parents and guardians to apply to the Gardaí to be told whether their child may have been in contact with a sexual offender.

His legislation, published last year, has not yet been allocated time for debate in the Dáil.

Read: Judges ‘need guidelines’ for sexual assault sentencing

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
25 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cheeky Charlie
    Favourite Cheeky Charlie
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 7:23 AM

    It will take centuries to undo the mess left after the British Empire … as well we know

    122
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute De20
    Favourite De20
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 8:49 AM

    It’s a bit of a stretch to Jammu and Kashmir chose to join India. The Maharajah decided to join India, the population had no choice in the matter

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute thephantomshit
    Favourite thephantomshit
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 10:10 AM

    @De20: lots of counties do things because their leaders decide to. Referendums are actually very unusual. Even when they occur it isn’t very clear what the population decided to do.
    And even dictators often (not always) do what the “population” wants. They tend to get overthrown otherwise.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cormac Ó Braonáin
    Favourite Cormac Ó Braonáin
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 9:43 AM

    ‘Jammu and Kashmir chose to join India over Pakistan’

    Wow, what a claim! Makes it all the more cringe worthy to see that it’s coming from an Irishman. Mr McCrave must believe Ireland chose to join England in personal union in 1542 and the UK in 1801.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute thephantomshit
    Favourite thephantomshit
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 10:11 AM

    @Cormac Ó Braonáin: Pakistan supported militants invaded kashmir so they opted to join India.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute jackbello
    Favourite jackbello
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 10:13 AM

    @Cormac Ó Braonáin: “”"”liberation”"”"” of the region from the British ????
    Slighted loaded , perhaps negative description ?

    How about something less perjorative /negative ?- liberation would suggest the British had somehow enslaved the princely state which patently it had not .

    In any case , what’s worse ? To be ruled by some local maharaja fabulously rich at the expense of the ruled , a prince with unlimited power , or be ensconced in the civilising embrace of the British empire???? The absolute power of a prince -but tempered with the guidance and restraint of London , for your average subject that was hardly seemed a bad deal…

    When it came to independence in 1947 the last maharaja was sad to see the British go – to then be forced to chose between India or Pakistan must have been awful.

    12
    See 4 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cormac Ó Braonáin
    Favourite Cormac Ó Braonáin
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 11:21 AM

    @thephantomshit:’they opted to join India’? did ‘they’ now? Maybe you can tell me when this vote took place.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Thomas Devlin
    Favourite Thomas Devlin
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 2:53 PM

    @jackbello: the civilizing British?as in Bloody Sunday?the many massacres of civilians in India the Irish famine,Cromwell,the paras,the glennane gang I could go on and on but I’d rather stay uncivilized thank you

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Amod Gokhale
    Favourite Amod Gokhale
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 2:57 PM

    @Cormac Ó Braonáin: When did NI vote to join UK ? or for that matter when did Germany vote to end World War II. You will be surprised to know that till 1950s,many countries were ruled by kings and kings took the decision for the local populace.
    In case of Kashmir, King decided to join neither India or Pakistan when asked in 1947 after British left.
    But Pakistan became impatient and attacked a sovereign state of Kashmir which meant the king had to decide. Either surrender or join India to allow India to sent defence forces. He chose to join India.
    That’s how ‘they’ opted for India

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ashish Uday Lal
    Favourite Ashish Uday Lal
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 3:17 PM

    @jackbello: Yes, liberated from the occupying British who entered a country producing 25% of the worlds GDP and left with a country producing 3%. Plundered resources, added value and sold them exclusively back at extortionate rates. Millions killed in famine like the Bengal famine. Oh well they got the railways and ‘civilisation’…rule Britannia and all that old chum…

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tim Pot
    Favourite Tim Pot
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 11:48 AM

    not much of an international response which has been strange.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Amod Gokhale
    Favourite Amod Gokhale
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 3:00 PM

    @Tim Pot: I didn’t see any international response when NI assembly was dissolved either. It was an internal matter for UK. Similarly this is an internal matter for India. India is not changing the demographic in any way, shape or form.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ashish Uday Lal
    Favourite Ashish Uday Lal
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 3:11 PM

    @Amod Gokhale: An internal matter where the President in a highly questionable move passed a law in the middle of the night while putting the Kashmiri parliament under house arrest, shutting down the internet, and putting the entire population under curfew. Not particularly democratic of the world’s largest democracy and most certainly questionable by the outside.

    8
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Amod Gokhale
    Favourite Amod Gokhale
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 8:26 PM

    @Ashish Uday Lal: There was no parliament in Kashmir for over a year. It was dissolved as the ruling coalition broke up and no party formed majority.
    The handful of leaders who are supposed to be jailed have been periodically tweeting and talking to reporters in total Internet blackout and under arrest. How is that??
    There were months of large scale demostrations and stone pelting when a militant died about 2yrs. Its only natural for federal govt to take drastic measures before aborating 370 when main local parties had warned of death and destruction if it happens.
    There is an important Muslim festival next week. Let’s see if there is a let up in lock down or not.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Amod Gokhale
    Favourite Amod Gokhale
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 2:45 PM

    “while the latter territory, with a sizeable Muslim population will not”. Are you kidding me ? Ladakh (the latter in the sentence) is predominantly Buddhist. Infact they were above 90% Buddhist in 1970s when muslims from Kasmir started to settle there.
    Historically (last seven decades) the Buddhist and Muslims in Ladakh were demanding separation from Kashmir anyway.
    This current decision to split is old demand met by federal government.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ashish Uday Lal
    Favourite Ashish Uday Lal
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 4:02 PM

    @Amod Gokhale: So in a democracy someone ‘demands’ something and the federal government does it? Where’s the debate, the vote? What evidence do you have of large scale Kashmiri migration to Ladakh? It would be difficult to find as there is none.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Amod Gokhale
    Favourite Amod Gokhale
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 8:11 PM

    @Ashish Uday Lal: Well actually, yes. In democracy the govt heeds demand of Common population and reacts accordingly. Ladakh currently is ruled by two hill councils and both passed resolutions demanding UT status. The current curfew status is not valid in Leh and Kargil. On Monday, there were pictures in many Indian news channels about normalcy in Ladakh. About 4-5 yrs back, J&K govt split Ladakh into two districts. A Muslim dominated Kargil and Buddhist dominated Leh. If muslim migration wasn’t happening, where did the Muslim population came from. As outsiders cannot come and buy land in J&K under article 370, the population has to from the state i.e. Migration.

    2
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Amod Gokhale
    Favourite Amod Gokhale
    Report
    Aug 7th 2019, 8:39 PM

    @Amod Gokhale: a correction : the districts were formed in 1980s not 4-5 as I said previously.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      News in 60 seconds