Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
DESCRIBED BY SCIENTISTS as one of the most significant breakthroughs in IVF technology, IVF time-lapse can deliver an uplift in birth rates of 56 per cent.
Development delays in an embryo at crucial stages can cause abnormalities in the embryo and may not result in a successful pregnancy. BeaconCARE Fertility’s Dr Simon Fisher and embryologist Alison Campbell say with the new time-lapse technology they can now predict whether an embryo has a low, medium or high chance of a live birth and “dramatically improves the chance of the embryologist selecting a normal viable embryo”. Alison Campbell said:
In conventional IVF laboratories, embryo development will be checked up to 6 times over a 5-day period. With time-lapse we have the ability to view more than 5000 images over the same time period to observe and measure more closely each stage of division and growth.
Speaking to TheJournal.ie Ms Cambell said that regular IVF treatment fails more than it succeeds, with couples going through multiple cycles at a high cost. Dr Simon Fisher said that data from the UK shows that couples needing fertility treatment, like IVF, is rising year on year.
“There is a problem with fertility globally for a number of factors. One reason is that people are starting families later in life and when they are coming up against difficulties it can take up to two or three years to find out what the issue is. At that point the woman may be in her late thirties and the problems can be compounded,” he said.
Unlike other EU countries, Ireland provides no treatment for infertility on the public health service and insurance companies have no obligation to provide cover for infertility.
Dr Fisher added that Ireland has a particular problem as Ireland has the highest age at which women are becoming mothers in Europe. “Our drive is to make IVF treatment more efficient, more accessible and less expensive, so that couples can avail of treatment once and be successful,” he said.
Fiona McPhillips, who runs the infertility charity Pomegranate.ie, told TheJournal.ie that the new innovation sounded like a great tool, as now there is no way to determine “what embryos want to become babies”. She said:
The success rate for IVF treatment is just 25 per cent. Traditionally embryos are left to develop over three to five days and then they pick the best ones, the ones that have the most cells.They look at them once a day, but that only tells the doctors how the embryo is doing at particular point in time. This advance would provide a lot more information as to why embryos are more likely to work.
Another major problem experienced by couples is that when IVF is unsuccessful there is no information as to why it did not work. This can be heartbreaking to couples, said Ms McPhillips.
“It can cost about €5000 per IVF cycle, with many couples going through three or four. Hopefully time-lapse technology will increase birth rates so that couples won’t have to go through endless cycles, paying out huge amounts and then not know why it has not worked. Any tool that can help couples to have babies or at least give them feedback as to why it was not successful is a huge advance for fertility treatment.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Have they found a way to blame Sinn Féin yet?
@Niall Power: Only Monday yet
It’s not surprising Fine Gael, the party of the rich, want to increase house prices for first time buyers.
We allowed banks to self regulate then the taxpayer had to bail them out, we allowed the insurance industry to self-regulate then the taxpayer had to bail them out and we allowed the construction industry to self regulate and now the taxpayer has to bail them out. There was a cosy relationship between construction and recent governments but trust has been permanently damaged. Not just mica but fire safety. Corners cut everywhere and no one accountable. If it adds 4K to the cost of a new house to build it in a manner that means it won’t crack and crumble into the ground within ten years then that is a cost worth paying.
@Sean: how long have you had a house Sean?
@Sean: that 4k figure is an absolute myth, based on figures that nobody thought to check.
This will be a great excuse for FF to pull the rug out from under Lord Veradader before his coronation in December.
The builders will get the maximum price they can for a house. The price they get will be determined by supply and demand. So the builder or developer will be the ones paying for the levy. The suggestion that if you put a levy on concrete the builder will just add it on to the price of the house is just simplistic.
@Mick Hyland: In simple terms this is correct.
But if a developer has input costs that increase by say 1%. Then 99 houses get built instead of 100. So it’ll still affect supply.
@Paolo Fandango: Why would only 99 houses get built if the developer’s input costs increase by 1%? The developer is not operating with a fixed pot of money; as long as he’s making an attractive return on capital he will continue to build more houses.
@Mick Hyland: the 1% is being absorbed by the developer. Fixed pot or not, it’s still less net income which reduces the amount of assets they can build.
The 1% cost doesn’t just disappear
So this is to offset the cost of mica redress scheme (which I believe impacted over 7000 homes). Am I miss understanding something here, but why is the whole Country now being forced to pay and contribute to a concrete levy (which we know will be permanent)? I know they are raising funds to offset, but this seems the complete wrong way to do it! Building material costs are already excessive.
I’m simple terms this is correct.
But if a developer has input costs that increase by say 1%. Then 99 houses get built instead of 100. So it’ll still affect supply.
@Paolo Fandango: this was supposed to be a response to mick above.
have your say